Literature DB >> 28273611

The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?

David N Barron1, Elizabeth West2.   

Abstract

There has been a radical transformation in the provision of adult residential and nursing home care in England over the past four decades. Up to the 1980s, over 80% of adult residential care was provided by the public sector, but today public sector facilities account for only 8% of the available places, with the rest being provided by a mixture of for-profit firms (74%) and non-profit charities (18%). The public sector's role is often now that of purchaser (paying the fees of people unable to afford them) and regulator. While the idea that private companies may play a bigger role in the future provision of health care is highly contentious in the UK, the transformation of the residential and nursing home care has attracted little comment. Concerns about the quality of care do emerge from time to time, often stimulated by high profile media investigations, scandals or criminal prosecutions, but there is little or no evidence about whether or not the transformation of the sector from largely public to private provision has had a beneficial effect on those who need the service. This study asks whether there are differences in the quality of care provided by public, non-profit or for-profit facilities in England. We use data on care quality for over 15,000 homes that are provided by the industry regulator in England: the Care Quality Commission (CQC). These data are the results of inspections carried out between April 2011 and October 2015. Controlling for a range of facility characteristics such as age and size, proportional odds logistic regression showed that for-profit facilities have lower CQC quality ratings than public and non-profit providers over a range of measures, including safety, effectiveness, respect, meeting needs and leadership. We discuss the implications of these results for the ongoing debates about the role of for-profit providers of health and social care.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  England; Facility regulation and control; Nursing homes; Ownership; Public sector; Public services; Quality of care; Quasi-markets; Residential care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28273611     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  The value of high-quality nursing and health education in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Zhiming Ma; Dan Zhang; Li Cheng; Ning Ye
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.

Authors:  Katherine Froggatt; Ashley Best; Frances Bunn; Girvan Burnside; Joanna Coast; Lesley Dunleavy; Claire Goodman; Ben Hardwick; Clare Jackson; Julie Kinley; Anne Davidson Lund; Jennifer Lynch; Paul Mitchell; Gareth Myring; Shakil Patel; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Nancy Preston; David Scott; Kate Silvera; Catherine Walshe
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Quality of Community-Based Care Services in Korea.

Authors:  Kichan Yoon; Munjae Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen; Paul Montgomery
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-22

5.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen; Brittany C L Lange; Paul Montgomery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Wieke M R Ligtenberg; Anke J M Oerlemans; Stef Groenewoud; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Optimal Subsidy Support for Market-Oriented Transformation of Elderly Care: Focus on the Gap between Supply and Demand in Aging Regions of China.

Authors:  Huan Song; Sihang Yu; Feng Liu; Xuan Sun; Tao Sun
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-29

8.  Subsidy policy selection of elderly care service projects under uncertain actual demand: a real options analysis based on China's experience.

Authors:  Huan Song; Kehan Ji; Tao Sun
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Can changes in spending on health and social care explain the recent mortality trends in Scotland? A protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Christina Wraw; Jon Minton; Rory Mitchell; Grant M A Wyper; Clare Campbell; Gerry McCartney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents' quality of life in England.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Towers; Sinead Palmer; Nick Smith; Grace Collins; Stephen Allan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.