Literature DB >> 28273334

Predator community composition is linked to soil carbon retention across a human land use gradient.

Oswald J Schmitz1, Robert W Buchkowski1, Jeffrey R Smith2, Mark Telthorst3, Adam E Rosenblatt1.   

Abstract

Soil carbon (C) storage is a major component of the carbon cycle. Consensus holds that soil C uptake and storage is regulated by plant-microbe-soil interactions. However, the contribution of animals in aboveground food webs to this process has been overlooked. Using insights from prior long-term experimentation in an old-field ecosystem and mathematical modeling, we predicted that the amount of soil C retention within a field should increase with the proportion of active hunting predators comprising the aboveground community of active hunting and sit-and-wait predators. This comes about because predators with different hunting modes have different cascading effects on plants. Our test of the prediction revealed that the composition of the arthropod predator community and associated cascading effects on the plant community explained 41% of variation in soil C retention among 15 old fields across a human land use gradient. We also evaluated the potential for several other candidate factors to explain variation in soil C retention among fields, independent of among-field variation in the predator community. These included live plant biomass, insect herbivore community composition, soil arthropod decomposer community composition, degree of land use development around the fields, field age, and soil texture. None of these candidate variables significantly explained soil C retention among the fields. The study offers a generalizable understanding of the pathways through which arthropod predator community composition can contribute to old-field ecosystem carbon storage. This insight helps support ongoing efforts to understand and manage the effects of anthropogenic land use change on soil C storage.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon management; carbon sequestration; food webs; land use; predator control of carbon dynamics; trophic cascades

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28273334     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

Review 1.  In-Field Habitat Management to Optimize Pest Control of Novel Soil Communities in Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Kirsten A Pearsons; John F Tooker
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  The mineralization characteristics of organic carbon and particle composition analysis in reconstructed soil with different proportions of soft rock and sand.

Authors:  Zhen Guo; Jichang Han; Yan Xu; Yangjie Lu; Chendi Shi; Lei Ge; Tingting Cao; Juan Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Do the evolutionary interactions between moths and bats promote niche partitioning between bats and birds?

Authors:  Lorinda S Bullington; Mathew T Seidensticker; Nathan Schwab; Philip W Ramsey; Kate Stone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation-risk effects to natural field patterns.

Authors:  Scott D Peacor; Nathan J Dorn; Justine A Smith; Nicole E Peckham; Michael J Cherry; Michael J Sheriff; David L Kimbro
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 11.274

5.  Differences in prey personality mediate trophic cascades.

Authors:  Nathalie R Sommer; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.