Literature DB >> 28272909

Identifying common values among seven health professions: An interprofessional analysis.

Sandra Grace1, Ev Innes2, Beverly Joffe2, Leah East1, Rosanne Coutts1, Susan Nancarrow1.   

Abstract

This article reviews the competency frameworks of seven Australian health professions to explore relationships among health professions of similar status as reflected in their competency frameworks and to identify common themes and values across the professions. Frameworks were compared using a constructivist grounded theory approach to identify key themes, against which individual competencies for each profession were mapped and compared. The themes were examined for underlying values and a higher order theoretical framework was developed. In contrast to classical theories of professionalism that foreground differentiation of professions, our study suggests that the professions embrace a common structure and understanding, based on shared underpinning values. We propose a model of two core values that encompass all identified themes: the rights of the client and the capacity of a particular profession to serve the healthcare needs of clients. Interprofessional practice represents the intersection of the rights of the client to receive the best available healthcare and the recognition of the individual contribution of each profession. Recognising that all health professions adhere to a common value base, and exploring professional similarities and differences from that value base, challenges a paradigm that distinguishes professions solely on scope of practice.

Keywords:  Competency-based education; constructivist grounded theory; interprofessional education; professional competencies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28272909     DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1288091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  2 in total

1.  Themes Underlying Australian General Practitioner Views towards Chiropractic and Osteopathy: An Assessment of Free Text Data from a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Sandra Grace; Roger Engel; Ian Jalsion
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Constructing critical thinking in health professional education.

Authors:  Renate Kahlke; Kevin Eva
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.