| Literature DB >> 28272356 |
Yelda Y Gurkan1, Esra Kasapbasi2, Nazli Turkten3, Zekiye Cinar3.
Abstract
Se4+ andEntities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; Se/N-codoping; TiO2; heterogeneous photocatalysis; sunlight
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28272356 PMCID: PMC6155415 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22030414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) X-ray Diffraction (XRD) diffractograms for undoped and 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2; (b) XRD peaks for (101) planes of undoped and 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2.
Crystallite sizes, band gap energies Eg and absorption wavelengths λ for the undoped and Se/N-codoped TiO2 samples.
| Samples | Calcination Temperature (K) 1 | Crystallite Size (nm) | λ (nm) | Eg (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 Evonik P-25 | 623 | 22.3 | 411 | 3.01 |
| 0.25% Se–0.1% N | 623 | 19.0 | 453 | 2.73 |
| 723 | 19.3 | 442 | 2.80 | |
| 823 | 19.2 | 437 | 2.83 | |
| 0.1% Se–0.25% N | 623 | 17.9 | 460 | 2.69 |
| 723 | 18.5 | 455 | 2.72 | |
| 823 | 19.0 | 451 | 2.74 | |
| 0.5% Se–0.5% N | 623 | 16.8 | 473 | 2.62 |
| 723 | 17.4 | 467 | 2.65 | |
| 823 | 17.9 | 458 | 2.70 | |
| 0.25% Se–0.25% N | 623 | 17.3 | 482 | 2.57 |
| 723 | 17.6 | 476 | 2.60 | |
| 823 | 17.9 | 469 | 2.64 | |
| 0.1% Se–0.1% N | 623 | 19.6 | 495 | 2.50 |
| 723 | 20.1 | 488 | 2.54 | |
| 823 | 20.4 | 480 | 2.56 |
1 All the values are for a calcination period of 3 h.
Figure 2Raman spectra for the undoped and 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2.
Figure 3Scanning electron (SEM) micrographs for (a) 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2; (b) undoped TiO2.
Figure 4UV-diffuse reflectance (UV-DRS) spectra of the undoped and 0.5%Se-0.5% N-codoped TiO2 samples (Red, TiO2; blue, Se/N-codoped TiO2).
Figure 5X-ray photoelectron (XPS) spectra of the undoped and 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2 samples, (a) Ti 2p; (b) O 1s; (c) Se 3p; (d) Se 3d; (e) N 1s.
Figure 6Kinetics of the photocatalytic disappearance of 4-NP on the undoped and Se/N-codoped TiO2 (0.5% Se–0.5% N) (a) with light; (b) with TiO2; (c) with TiO2 + light; (d) with Se/N-codoped TiO2 + light; (e) with TiO2 + sunlight; (f) with 0.5% Se–0.5% N-codoped TiO2 + sunlight.
Apparent first order rate constants k for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-NP in the presence of the Se/N-codoped TiO2 samples.
| Photocatalyst | k (10−3·min−1) | r | % Degradation |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2Evonik P-25 | 9.21 ± 0.009 | 0.991 | 69.83 |
| 0.25% Se–0.1% N | 14.85 ± 0.005 | 0.991 | 77.19 |
| 0.1% Se–0.25% N | 17.52 ± 0.008 | 0.985 | 79.58 |
| 0.5% Se–0.5% N | 20.21 ± 0.007 | 0.994 | 87.71 |
| 0.25% Se–0.25%N | 18.99 ± 0.001 | 0.987 | 82.70 |
| 0.1% Se–0.1% N | 14.97 ± 0.003 | 0.986 | 73.67 |
1 Values in italics are the results of sunlight experiments.
Figure 7Optimized structures of Se/N-codoped TiO2 clusters (a) substitutional Se/N-codoped model; (b) interstitial Se/N-codoped model (Grey, Ti; red, O; orange, Se; white, H; blue, N).
Figure 8Energy level diagrams and the frontier orbitals of the (a) undoped TiO2; (b) substitutional Se/N-codoped TiO2; (c) interstitial Se/N-codoped TiO2 clusters computed with DFT/B3LYP method. (Grey, Ti; red, O; orange, Se; white, H; blue, N) (Values in italics are the DFT results).