K Hod1,2, A D Sperber3, Y Ron4, M Boaz5, R Dickman6, S Berliner7, Z Halpern4, N Maharshak4, R Dekel4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Research Division, Epidemiology Service, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel. 5. Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. 6. Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, Belinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel. 7. Department of Medicine E, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Micro-inflammation is considered an element in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). High-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) was previously shown to be higher in IBS compared to healthy controls, albeit within the normal range. Since probiotics may suppress micro-inflammation in the gut, we tested if they reduce symptoms and inflammatory markers (hs-CRP and fecal calprotectin (FC) in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of BIO-25, a multispecies probiotic, in women with IBS-D. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-week run-in, eligible women were assigned at random to a probiotic capsule or an indistinguishable placebo, twice daily for 8 weeks. IBS symptoms and stool consistency were rated daily by Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS). High-sensitivity C reactive protein was tested at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. FC was tested at baseline and 8 weeks. KEY RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-twoIBS-D patients were recruited and 107 eligible patients were allocated to the intervention (n=54) or placebo (n=53) group. All symptoms improved in both groups with no significant difference between them in symptom improvement, hs-CRP or FC levels. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: An 8-week treatment with BIO-25 improved symptoms in women with IBS-D, but was not superior to placebo. This rigorously designed and executed study supports the findings of other studies that did not demonstrate superiority of probiotics over placebo in IBS. High quality clinical studies are necessary to examine the efficacy of other specific probiotics in IBS-D patients since data are still conflicting.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Micro-inflammation is considered an element in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). High-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) was previously shown to be higher in IBS compared to healthy controls, albeit within the normal range. Since probiotics may suppress micro-inflammation in the gut, we tested if they reduce symptoms and inflammatory markers (hs-CRP and fecal calprotectin (FC) in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of BIO-25, a multispecies probiotic, in women with IBS-D. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-week run-in, eligible women were assigned at random to a probiotic capsule or an indistinguishable placebo, twice daily for 8 weeks. IBS symptoms and stool consistency were rated daily by Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS). High-sensitivity C reactive protein was tested at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. FC was tested at baseline and 8 weeks. KEY RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two IBS-D patients were recruited and 107 eligible patients were allocated to the intervention (n=54) or placebo (n=53) group. All symptoms improved in both groups with no significant difference between them in symptom improvement, hs-CRP or FC levels. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: An 8-week treatment with BIO-25 improved symptoms in women with IBS-D, but was not superior to placebo. This rigorously designed and executed study supports the findings of other studies that did not demonstrate superiority of probiotics over placebo in IBS. High quality clinical studies are necessary to examine the efficacy of other specific probiotics in IBS-D patients since data are still conflicting.
Authors: Edoardo Savarino; Fabiana Zingone; Brigida Barberio; Giovanni Marasco; Filiz Akyuz; Hale Akpinar; Oana Barboi; Giorgia Bodini; Serhat Bor; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Gheorghe Cristian; Maura Corsetti; Antonio Di Sabatino; Anca Mirela Dimitriu; Vasile Drug; Dan L Dumitrascu; Alexander C Ford; Goran Hauser; Radislav Nakov; Nisha Patel; Daniel Pohl; Cătălin Sfarti; Jordi Serra; Magnus Simrén; Alina Suciu; Jan Tack; Murat Toruner; Julian Walters; Cesare Cremon; Giovanni Barbara Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 6.866
Authors: Paul Moayyedi; Christopher N Andrews; Glenda MacQueen; Christina Korownyk; Megan Marsiglio; Lesley Graff; Brent Kvern; Adriana Lazarescu; Louis Liu; William G Paterson; Sacha Sidani; Stephen Vanner Journal: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Date: 2019-01-17
Authors: Ángela Rodríguez-Padilla; Germán Morales-Martín; Rocío Pérez-Quintero; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-05-02
Authors: Ángela Rodríguez-Padilla; Germán Morales-Martín; Rocío Pérez-Quintero; Ricardo Rada-Morgades; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-25