Paul A Estabrooks1, Kathryn E Wilson2, Todd J McGuire3, Samantha M Harden4, NithyaPriya Ramalingam5, Lia Schoepke3, Fabio A Almeida2, Amy L Bayer6. 1. Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984365 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4365, USA. paul.estabrooks@unmc.edu. 2. Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984365 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4365, USA. 3. IncentaHealth LLC, Denver, CO, USA. 4. Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. 5. Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. 6. Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Prevention and Chronic Care Solutions, Denver, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary care addresses obesity through physician oversight of intensive lifestyle interventions or referral to external programs with demonstrated efficacy. However, limited information exists on community program reach, effectiveness, and costs across different groups of participants. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a scalable, community weight loss program using reach, effectiveness, and cost metrics. DESIGN: Longitudinal pre-post quasi-experiment without control. PARTICIPANTS: Enrolled participants in Weigh and Win (WAW), a community-based weight loss program. INTERVENTION: A 12-month program with daily social cognitive theory-based email and/or text support, online access to health coaches, objective weight assessment through 83 community-based kiosks, and modest financial incentives to increase program reach. MAIN MEASURES: Number of participants, representativeness, weight loss achievement (3%, 5% of initial weight lost), and cost of implementation. KEY RESULTS: A total of 40,308 adults (79% women; 73% white; BMI = 32.3 ± 7.44, age = 43.9 ± 13.1 years) enrolled in WAW. Women were more likely than men to enroll in the program and continue engagement beyond an initial weigh-in (57% vs. 53%). Based on census data, African Americans were over-represented in the sample. Among participants who engaged in the program beyond an initial weigh-in (n = 19,029), 47% and 34% of participants lost 3% and 5% of their initial body weight, respectively. The average duration for those who achieved 5% weight loss was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. African American participants were more likely to achieve 5% weight loss and remain enrolled in the program longer compared to non-African American participants (2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2 years). Implementation costs were $2,822,698. Cost per clinically meaningful weight loss for African Americans ($257.97/3% loss; $335.96/5% loss) was lower than that for Hispanics ($318.62; $431.10) and Caucasians ($313.65; $441.87), due to the higher success rate of that subgroup of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Weigh and Win is a scalable technology-supported and community-based weight loss program that reaches a large number of participants and may contribute to reducing health disparities.
BACKGROUND: Primary care addresses obesity through physician oversight of intensive lifestyle interventions or referral to external programs with demonstrated efficacy. However, limited information exists on community program reach, effectiveness, and costs across different groups of participants. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a scalable, community weight loss program using reach, effectiveness, and cost metrics. DESIGN: Longitudinal pre-post quasi-experiment without control. PARTICIPANTS: Enrolled participants in Weigh and Win (WAW), a community-based weight loss program. INTERVENTION: A 12-month program with daily social cognitive theory-based email and/or text support, online access to health coaches, objective weight assessment through 83 community-based kiosks, and modest financial incentives to increase program reach. MAIN MEASURES: Number of participants, representativeness, weight loss achievement (3%, 5% of initial weight lost), and cost of implementation. KEY RESULTS: A total of 40,308 adults (79% women; 73% white; BMI = 32.3 ± 7.44, age = 43.9 ± 13.1 years) enrolled in WAW. Women were more likely than men to enroll in the program and continue engagement beyond an initial weigh-in (57% vs. 53%). Based on census data, African Americans were over-represented in the sample. Among participants who engaged in the program beyond an initial weigh-in (n = 19,029), 47% and 34% of participants lost 3% and 5% of their initial body weight, respectively. The average duration for those who achieved 5% weight loss was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. African American participants were more likely to achieve 5% weight loss and remain enrolled in the program longer compared to non-African American participants (2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2 years). Implementation costs were $2,822,698. Cost per clinically meaningful weight loss for African Americans ($257.97/3% loss; $335.96/5% loss) was lower than that for Hispanics ($318.62; $431.10) and Caucasians ($313.65; $441.87), due to the higher success rate of that subgroup of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Weigh and Win is a scalable technology-supported and community-based weight loss program that reaches a large number of participants and may contribute to reducing health disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral weight Loss; cost; impact; incentives; public health
Authors: Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica L Oleski; Juliana M Luciani; Jamie S Bodenlos; Matt C Whited Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Kimberly A Gudzune; Ruchi S Doshi; Ambereen K Mehta; Zoobia W Chaudhry; David K Jacobs; Rachit M Vakil; Clare J Lee; Sara N Bleich; Jeanne M Clark Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-08-15
Authors: Rena R Wing; Richard F Hamman; George A Bray; Linda Delahanty; Sharon L Edelstein; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; Mary A Hoskin; Andrea Kriska; John Lachin; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith G Regensteiner; Beth Venditti; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Obes Res Date: 2004-09
Authors: Eliana M Perrin; Julie C Jacobson Vann; Suzanne Lazorick; Alice Ammerman; Sari Teplin; Kori Flower; Steven E Wegner; John T Benjamin Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2008-11
Authors: Tzeyu L Michaud; Wen You; Kathryn E Wilson; Dejun Su; Todd J McGuire; Fabio A Almeida; Amy L Bayer; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Samantha M Harden; Matthew Lee Smith; Marcia G Ory; Renae L Smith-Ray; Paul A Estabrooks; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-03-22
Authors: Gitanjali Srivastava; Kenya D Palmer; Kathy A Ireland; Ashley C McCarthy; Kate E Donovan; Aaron J Manders; Juhee McDougal; Carine M Lenders; Caroline M Apovian Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Meliha Salahuddin; Sarah E Barlow; Stephen J Pont; Nancy F Butte; Deanna M Hoelscher Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Samantha M Harden; Bridget Gaglio; Borsika Rabin; Matthew Lee Smith; Gwenndolyn C Porter; Marcia G Ory; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-03-29