Literature DB >> 28271389

Talking About Your Prostate: Perspectives from Providers and Community Members.

Seul Ki Choi1, Jessica S Seel2, Susan E Steck2,3, Johnny Payne4, Douglas McCormick5, Courtney S Schrock2, Daniela B Friedman6,7.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PrCA) screening is controversial, especially for African-American (AA) men who have higher PrCA incidence and mortality than other racial/ethnic groups. Patient-provider communication is important for the PrCA screening decision process. The study purpose was to better understand the current dialogue between primary care providers (PCPs-physicians and nurse practitioners) and AA men about PrCA prevention and screening. An online survey with 46 PCPs, education sessions (including pre/post surveys) with 56 AA men, and a forum with 5 panelists and 38 AA men for open dialogue were held to examine both provider and community perspectives on PrCA communication needs and practices. PCPs' perceptions of PrCA screening were varied and they used different PrCA screening guidelines in their practices. PCPs and AA men had different experiences with PrCA communication. PCPs reported that they have discussions about PrCA screening and prostate health with AA patients; few AA men reported these same experiences. About 38.0% of PCPs reported that they remain neutral about PSA testing during discussions; however, only 10.7% of AA men reported that their doctor remained neutral. Prostate health knowledge among AA men increased significantly following participation in the education sessions (p < 0.001). AA community members reported high satisfaction regarding the education session and forum. Different recommendations from PCPs may hinder AA men's decisions about PrCA screening. The forum used in this study could be a model for others to help improve patient-provider communication and increase engagement in dialogue about this common cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; Community forum; Education; Patient-provider communication; Primary care provider; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28271389      PMCID: PMC5589476          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1205-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  27 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer--the controversy that refuses to die.

Authors:  Michael J Barry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Innovative and Community-Guided Evaluation and Dissemination of a Prostate Cancer Education Program for African-American Men and Women.

Authors:  Dawnyea D Jackson; Otis L Owens; Daniela B Friedman; Ragan Dubose-Morris
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Promoting clinical research to medically underserved communities: current practices and perceptions about clinical trial recruiting strategies.

Authors:  Andrea Tanner; Sei-Hill Kim; Daniela B Friedman; Caroline Foster; Caroline D Bergeron
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Lisa C Richardson; Thomas B Richards; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The influence of physician recommendation on prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Daniel Pucheril; Deepansh Dalela; Jesse Sammon; Akshay Sood; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mani Menon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  An exploratory study of older adults' comprehension of printed cancer information: is readability a key factor?

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

8.  Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Alexander Persoskie; Allison Ottenbacher; Jada G Hamilton; Jennifer D Allen; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Sarah T Hawley; Suzanne Kneuper; E Wayne Holden; Leonardo A Stroud; Crystale Purvis Cooper; Judy M Berkowitz; Lawrence E Scholl; Smita S Saraykar; Valory N Pavlik
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.

Authors:  Melissa L Potestio; Jamie M Boyd; Sean M Bagshaw; Daren Heyland; Peter Oxland; Christopher J Doig; Dave Zygun; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictors of annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening among black men: results from an urban community-based prostate cancer screening program.

Authors:  Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Saira Khan; Veronica Hicks; Bettina F Drake
Journal:  J Mens Health       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 0.537

2.  An Exploration of Precancer and Post-Cancer Diagnosis and Health Communication Among African American Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Families.

Authors:  Sabrina L Dickey; Caneisaya Matthews; Eugenia Millender
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 May-Jun

3.  Implementing Community-Based Prostate Cancer Education in Rural South Carolina: a Collaborative Approach Through a Statewide Cancer Alliance.

Authors:  Catherine Troy; Ashley Brunson; Andrew Goldsmith; Samuel Noblet; Susan E Steck; James R Hebert; Johnny Payne; Doug McCormick; Daniela B Friedman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.037

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.