Literature DB >> 28271219

Regularity of approaching visual stimuli influences spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Tsukasa Kimura1, Jun'ichi Katayama2,3.   

Abstract

This study examines how the regularity of visual stimuli approaching the body influences spatial expectations of subsequent somatosensory stimuli by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during a simple reaction time (RT) task involving responses to somatosensory stimuli. Twenty-one participants were instructed to put their arms on a desk, and three LEDs were placed equidistantly between their arms. Electrical stimuli were presented with a high probability (80%) of being applied to one wrist and a low probability (20%) of being applied to the opposite wrist. One trial was composed of three visual stimuli followed by one electrical stimulus. In the regular approach condition, LEDs flashed sequentially toward the wrist with the high-probability somatosensory stimulus. In the irregular approach condition, the first and second visual stimuli were presented randomly, but the third visual stimulus was invariably presented near the wrist with the high-probability stimulus. In both conditions, RTs for low-probability stimuli were slower than those for high-probability stimuli, and the low-probability stimuli elicited larger P3 amplitudes than the high-probability stimuli. Furthermore, the largest P3 amplitude was elicited by low-probability stimuli under the regular approach condition, whereas the amplitudes of contingent negative variation (CNV) elicited before the presentation of the somatosensory stimuli did not differ between conditions. These results indicate that regularity of visual stimuli approaching the body facilitates an automatic spatial expectation for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; Multimodality interaction; Spatial expectation; Visuotactile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28271219     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4863-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  C Spence; F Pavani; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  Crossmodal spatial attention.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  The trajectory effect in intermodal temporal order judgments.

Authors:  James C Craig
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b.

Authors:  J Katayama; J Polich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.

Authors:  C C Duncan-Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Approach of visual stimuli modulates spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Calderon; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  The approach of visual stimuli influences expectations about stimulus types for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Congruency of intervening events and self-induced action influence prediction of final results.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exploration of illusory visual motion stimuli: An EEG-based brain-computer interface for practical assistive communication systems.

Authors:  Yunyong Punsawad; Nannaphat Siribunyaphat; Yodchanan Wongsawat
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-03-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.