Literature DB >> 28270992

Methods to assess sensitivity of optical coherence tomography systems.

Anant Agrawal1, T Joshua Pfefer1, Peter D Woolliams2, Peter H Tomlins3, George Nehmetallah4.   

Abstract

Measuring the sensitivity of an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system determines the minimum sample reflectivity it can detect and provides a figure of merit for system optimization and comparison. The published literature lacks a detailed description of OCT sensitivity measurement procedures. Here we describe a commonly-used measurement method and introduce two new phantom-based methods, which also offer a means to directly visualize low reflectivity conditions relevant to biological tissue. We provide quantitative results for the three methods from different OCT system configurations and discuss the methods' advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords:  (110.3000) Image quality assessment; (170.4500) Optical coherence tomography; (350.4800) Optical standards and testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 28270992      PMCID: PMC5330563          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.000902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  17 in total

1.  Swept source optical coherence tomography using an all-fiber 1300-nm ring laser source.

Authors:  Michael A Choma; Kevin Hsu; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Extended focus depth for Fourier domain optical coherence microscopy.

Authors:  R A Leitgeb; M Villiger; A H Bachmann; L Steinmann; T Lasser
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Quantitative evaluation of optical coherence tomography signal enhancement with gold nanoshells.

Authors:  Anant Agrawal; Stanley Huang; Alex Wei Haw Lin; Min-Ho Lee; Jennifer K Barton; Rebekah A Drezek; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Michael Choma; Marinko Sarunic; Changhuei Yang; Joseph Izatt
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Performance of fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  R Leitgeb; C Hitzenberger; Adolf Fercher
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  High-speed optical coherence domain reflectometry.

Authors:  E A Swanson; D Huang; M R Hee; J G Fujimoto; C P Lin; C A Puliafito
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Optical frequency domain imaging with a rapidly swept laser in the 815-870 nm range.

Authors:  H Lim; J F de Boer; B H Park; E C Lee; R Yelin; S H Yun
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Energy-efficient low-Fresnel-number Bessel beams and their application in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dirk Lorenser; C Christian Singe; Andrea Curatolo; David D Sampson
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Multimodal adaptive optics retinal imager: design and performance.

Authors:  Daniel X Hammer; R Daniel Ferguson; Mircea Mujat; Ankit Patel; Emily Plumb; Nicusor Iftimia; Toco Y P Chui; James D Akula; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Longitudinal vascular dynamics following cranial window and electrode implantation measured with speckle variance optical coherence angiography.

Authors:  Daniel X Hammer; Andrea Lozzi; Erkinay Abliz; Noah Greenbaum; Anant Agrawal; Victor Krauthamer; Cristin G Welle
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  6 in total

1.  High dynamic range optical coherence tomography angiography (HDR-OCTA).

Authors:  Xiang Wei; Tristan T Hormel; Shaohua Pi; Yukun Guo; Yifan Jian; Yali Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Two dimensional non-scanning transform-free spatial-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yu-Kai Lin; Chun-Wei Chang; I-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Rapid chemically selective 3D imaging in the mid-infrared.

Authors:  Eric O Potma; David Knez; Yong Chen; Yulia Davydova; Amanda Durkin; Alexander Fast; Mihaela Balu; Brenna Norton-Baker; Rachel W Martin; Tommaso Baldacchini; Dmitry A Fishman
Journal:  Optica       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 11.104

4.  High-speed label-free confocal microscopy of Caenorhabditis elegans with near infrared spectrally encoded confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Sadaf Rashtchian; Khaled Youssef; Pouya Rezai; Nima Tabatabaei
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Non-destructive morphological observation of anatomical growth process in Haemaphysalis Longicornis tick specimens using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Junsoo Lee; Ruchire Eranga Wijesinghe; Mansik Jeon; Jeehyun Kim
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.205

6.  Signal averaging improves signal-to-noise in OCT images: But which approach works best, and when?

Authors:  Bernhard Baumann; Conrad W Merkle; Rainer A Leitgeb; Marco Augustin; Andreas Wartak; Michael Pircher; Christoph K Hitzenberger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.732

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.