| Literature DB >> 28270691 |
A Gratwohl1, A Sureda2, J Cornelissen3, J Apperley4, P Dreger5, R Duarte6, H T Greinix7, E Mc Grath8, N Kroeger9, F Lanza10, A Nagler11, J A Snowden12, D Niederwieser13, R Brand14.
Abstract
Differences in major and minor histocompatibility antigens between donor and recipient trigger powerful graft-versus-host reactions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The clinical effects of alloreactivity present a Janus-face: detrimental graft-versus-host disease increases non-relapse mortality, beneficial graft-versus-malignancy may cure the recipient. The ultimate consequences on long-term outcome remain a matter of debate. We hypothesized that increasing donor-recipient antigen matching would decrease the negative effects, while preserving antitumor alloreactivity. We analyzed retrospectively a predefined cohort of 32 838 such patients and compared it to 59 692 patients with autologous HSCT as reference group. We found a significant and systematic decrease in non-relapse mortality with decreasing phenotypic and genotypic antigen disparity, paralleled by a stepwise increase in overall and relapse-free survival (Spearman correlation coefficients of cumulative excess event rates at 5 years 0.964; P<0.00; respectively 0.976; P<0.00). We observed this systematic stepwise effect in all main disease and disease-stage categories. The results suggest that detrimental effects of alloreactivity are additive with each step of mismatching; the beneficial effects remain preserved. Hence, if there is a choice, the best match should be donor of choice. The data support an intensified search for predictive genomic and environmental factors of 'no-graft-versus-host disease'.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28270691 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.79
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528