| Literature DB >> 28270564 |
Daniel Scotcher1, Sarah Billington1, Jay Brown1, Christopher R Jones1, Colin D A Brown1, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan1, Aleksandra Galetin2.
Abstract
In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of drug metabolism data obtained in enriched preparations of subcellular fractions rely on robust estimates of physiologically relevant scaling factors for the prediction of clearance in vivo. The purpose of the current study was to measure the microsomal and cytosolic protein per gram of kidney (MPPGK and CPPGK) in dog and human kidney cortex using appropriate protein recovery marker and evaluate functional activity of human cortex microsomes. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) activity were used as microsomal protein markers, whereas glutathione-S-transferase activity was a cytosolic marker. Functional activity of human microsomal samples was assessed by measuring mycophenolic acid glucuronidation. MPPGK was 33.9 and 44.0 mg/g in dog kidney cortex, and 41.1 and 63.6 mg/g in dog liver (n = 17), using P450 content and G6Pase activity, respectively. No trends were noted between kidney, liver, and intestinal scalars from the same animals. Species differences were evident, as human MPPGK and CPPGK were 26.2 and 53.3 mg/g in kidney cortex (n = 38), respectively. MPPGK was 2-fold greater than the commonly used in vitro-in vivo extrapolation scalar; this difference was attributed mainly to tissue source (mixed kidney regions versus cortex). Robust human MPPGK and CPPGK scalars were measured for the first time. The work emphasized the importance of regional differences (cortex versus whole kidney-specific MPPGK, tissue weight, and blood flow) and a need to account for these to improve assessment of renal metabolic clearance and its extrapolation to in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28270564 PMCID: PMC5399648 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.117.075242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Metab Dispos ISSN: 0090-9556 Impact factor: 3.922
Fig. 1.Comparison of kidney regions used to prepare HKMs for in vitro assays and different scaling factors currently used for extrapolation. Matrix-scalar combinations that have been used in the literature are annotated as being appropriate (green ✓), inappropriate (red x) or ambiguous/ debatable (blue?). Typically, scaled intrinsic clearance (CLint) data are subsequently used as input into static or physiologically based kidney models for prediction of in vivo renal metabolic clearance (CLR,met). The assumptions of a particular kidney model (e.g., well-stirred or with regional/ cellular differences) will dictate the most appropriate matrix and scalar to use for in vitro metabolic data. Similarly, the availability of tissue for in vitro experiments (e.g., mixed kidney or cortex only) may limit the scaling factor and affect the selection of a kidney model. Adapted from Fig. 1 in Scotcher et al. (2016a) and references therein, licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Parameters used in calculation of MPPGK and CPPGK from human and dog kidney cortex samples
| Parameter | Description | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Abs_Protx | Absolute protein yield in homogenate or subfraction ( | mg |
| [Prot]x | Protein concentration of homogenate or subfraction ( | mg/ml |
| Vx, total | Volume of homogenate or subfraction ( | ml |
| Vx, aliquot | Volume of homogenate or subfraction aliquot taken for analysis | ml |
| Markerx | Activity or content of subcellular protein marker in homogenate, microsome, or cytosol ( | nmol/mg protein (CYP) |
| nmol/min/mg protein (G6Pase) | ||
| nmol/min/mg protein (GST) | ||
| WKid | Weight of starting kidney tissue mince | g |
| YieldMarker, theor | Theoretical yield of subcellular protein marker from homogenate, accounting for aliquot removal | nmol (CYP) |
| nmol/min (G6Pase) | ||
| nmol/min (GST) | ||
| YieldMarker, actual | Actual yield of subcellular protein marker from homogenate | nmol (CYP) |
| nmol/min (G6Pase) | ||
| nmol/min (GST) | ||
| RecoveryX | Percent recovery | % |
| Enrichmentx | Enrichment factor of subcellular protein ( | |
| Mic_ ProtHom | Amount of microsomal protein in the homogenate, based on starting tissue weight and the MPPGK. | mg |
| Mic_GSTHom | Activity of GST in the homogenate attributable to microsomal isoform(s) | nmol/min |
| YieldGST,theor,corrected | Theoretical cytosolic GST activity yield. The GST activity yield in the homogenate that was attributed to the cytosolic fraction (i.e., corrected for the microsomal GST activity) | nmol/min |
| S9_contributionHom | Theoretical % contribution of the microsomal protein and cytosolic protein (i.e., S9 fraction) to overall protein in homogenate | % |
Where x represents either homogenate (Hom), 9000g supernatant (S9), or microsomes (Mic). Equations are stated in the (eq. 1–12).
Physiologic values used for CLR,met,UGT predictions using IVIVE in different scenarios
| Parameter (U) | Scenario 1 (Whole Kidney) | Scenario 2 (Kidney Cortex) |
|---|---|---|
| MPPGK (mg/g kidney) | 11.1 | Donor specific |
| Kidney weight (g/kg body weight) | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| Renal blood flow (ml/min/kg body weight) | 16.4 | 13.2 |
Weighted (by number of donors) mean of values reported for microsomes prepared from mixed kidney or unspecified region (Al-Jahdari et al., 2006; Knights et al., 2016).
Fig. 5 and (Supplemental Table S3).
Fig. 5.MPPGK and CPPGK protein content of kidney cortex and homogenate protein yields in 38 human kidney cortex samples. Combined value of MPPGK and CPPGK in each donor represents the estimated S9 protein per gram of kidney cortex; this value should not exceed the homogenate protein yield to be physiologically plausible. CMFT number and NC number indicate samples acquired from the CMFT Biobank or Newcastle University, respectively. Each bar represents n = 1 batch of homogenate/microsomes/cytosol per donor. Individual values are listed (Supplemental Table S3).
CYP content, G6Pase activity, and MPPG measured in homogenate and microsomal samples prepared from fresh dog kidney cortex, frozen dog kidney cortex, and frozen dog liver
Average values are presented, with CVs in parentheses. G6Pase activity was not measured in samples prepared from fresh dog kidney cortex. Data for individual dogs are presented (Supplemental Table S2).
| CYP Content (nmol/mg Protein) | G6Pase Activity (nmol/min/mg Protein) | MPPG (mg/g Tissue) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homogenate | Microsomes | Homogenate | Microsomes | CYP content | G6Pase activity | ||
| Fresh tissue ( | Dog kidney cortex | 0.086 (24%) | 0.205 (23%) | Not measured | Not measured | 43.1 (22%) | Not measured |
| Dog intestine | Data not available | 0.059 (27%) | Not measured | Not measured | 6.5 (61%) | Not measured | |
| Frozen tissue ( | Dog kidney cortex | 0.056 (16%) | 0.230 (15%) | 19.9 (16%) | 62.1 (16%) | 33.9 (18%) | 44.0 (16%) |
| Dog liver | 0.113 (19%) | 0.665 (20%) | 23.8 (15%) | 91.2 (18%) | 41.1 (12%) | 63.6 (18%) | |
Data for dog intestine were provided by Dr Oliver Hatley (manuscript in preparation) and represent data pooled from several intestinal regions.
Fig. 2.Comparison of MPPGK and MPPGL in dogs (n = 17 dogs) using either CYP content (black circle) or G6Pase activity (blue cross) as the microsomal protein marker. Each point represents microsomal scalar measured using a single batch of homogenates and microsomes from a single dog.
Fig. 3.Bland-Altman plots: difference in MPPG measured using CYP content versus G6Pase activity as microsomal protein marker. Points on graphs represent measurements made in kidney cortex (A) or liver (B) microsome and homogenate samples. Blue lines represent mean (solid) and 95% confidence interval of mean (dashed) difference between MPPGs. Red dotted lines represent 95% limits of agreement. Thin black lines represent line of unity.
Fig. 4.Marker activities measured in 38 human kidney cortex samples. (A) G6Pase activity in homogenate and microsomes. (B) GST activity homogenate, microsomes, and cytosols. CMFT number and NC number indicate samples acquired from the CMFT Biobank or Newcastle University, respectively. Each bar typically represent n = 1 measurements per donor, although for some samples bars represent the average of n = 2 measurements. Individual values are listed (Supplemental Table S3).
MPPGK, CPPGK, and S9PPGK for samples prepared from frozen human kidney. Data for individual donors are presented (Supplemental Table S3)
| MPPGK (mg Protein/g Kidney Cortex) | CPPGK (mg Protein/g kidney Cortex) | S9PPGK (mg Protein/g Kidney Cortex) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All donors ( | |||
| Average | 26.2 | 53.3 | 79.5 |
| CV (%) | 27 | 31 | 24 |
| Range | 9.0–42.6 | 30.6–123.2 | 45.9–149.9 |
| CMFT donors only ( | |||
| Average | 28.4 | 60.3 | 88.7 |
| CV (%) | 21 | 30 | 21 |
| Range | 20.2–42.6 | 38.4–123.2 | 69.6–149.9 |
| NC donors only ( | |||
| Average | 23.7 | 45.5 | 69.2 |
| CV (%) | 32 | 23 | 21 |
| Range | 9.0–34.3 | 30.6–63.8 | 45.9–87.8 |
Fig. 6.Individual (blue open circle) and mean (black line) mycophenolic acid CLint,u,UGT,HKM (µl/min/mg protein) for donors with different allelic variants for the −900G > A SNP in the UGT2B7 gene (rs7438135).
Comparison of scaled mycophenolic acid CLint,u,UGT,HKM and predicted CLUGT in scenarios that take different assumptions for physiologic parameters (see Table 2)
Mean values from 20 individual human kidney cortex microsomes are shown, with CVs in parentheses. Data for individual donors are listed (Supplemental Table S3).
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| CLint,u,UGT,HKM ( | 1061 (43%) | |
| MPPGK (mg/g kidney) | 11.1 | 28.4 (21%) |
| Scaled CLint,u,UGT,HKM (ml/min/g kidney) | 11.8 (43%) | 30.2 (53%) |
| Kidney:liver ratio for scaled CLint,u,UGT | 1.26 (43%) | 3.24 (53%) |
| Kidney weight (g/kg body weight) | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| fu,p | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| RB | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| QR (ml/min/kg) | 16.4 | 13.2 |
| Predicted CLR,met,UGT (ml/min/kg) | 0.83 (41%) | 1.35 (47%) |
| Kidney: liver ratio for predicted CLmet,UGT | 0.29 (41%) | 0.47 (47%) |
| Predicted CLUGT (mL/min/kg) | 3.70 (9%) | 4.21 (15%) |
| Mean predicted/observed CLUGT | 0.93 (9%) | 1.06 (15%) |
11.1 mg/g kidney used for all donors, calculated as weighted (by donor number) mean of values recently reported for mixed kidney and unspecified kidney region (Al-Jahdari et al., 2006; Knights et al., 2016).
Donor-specific MPPGK values measured in the current study used.
CLint,u,UGT,HLM was 9.32 ml/min/g liver, which is based on in vitro measurements in the presence of BSA (Gill et al., 2012).
CLh,met,UGT (2.86 ml/min/kg) calculated per Gill et al. (2012).
Observed CLUGT was 3.97 ml/min/kg (Gill et al., 2012).
Fig. 7.IVIVE of mycophenolic acid clearance under two different scenarios. MPPGK, kidney weight, and blood flow parameters used for scaling and in the well stirred kidney model represented either the whole kidney (Scenario 1) or kidney cortex (Scenario 2); details are listed in Table 5. (A) Kidney: liver ratios of scaled mycophenolic acid CLint,u,UGT (ml/min/g tissue). Bars represent mean values; error bars represent the standard deviation. (B) Prediction accuracy of mycophenolic acid CLUGT, considering either the hepatic glucuronidation alone or the sum of the hepatic and renal glucuronidation clearances. The contribution of renal glucuronidation was predicted using two scenarios. Individual (blue open circle) and mean (black line) data are shown (n = 20). Solid horizontal line represents line of unity.