Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a digital companion system used by older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We utilized a commercially available system that is comprehensive in its functionalities (including conversation ability, use of pictures and other media, and reminders) to explore the system's impact on older adults ' social interactions, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and acceptance of the system. Study Design: We conducted a three-month mixed methods evaluation study of the digital companion. Results: Ten female community-dwelling older adults (average age 78.3 years) participated in the study. Overall, participants utilized the tool regularly and appreciated its presence and their interactions. Participants scored higher at the end of the study in cognition and social support scales, and lower in presence of depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Findings indicate the feasibility of a digital companion for people with MCI and inform the need for additional research.
Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a digital companion system used by older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We utilized a commercially available system that is comprehensive in its functionalities (including conversation ability, use of pictures and other media, and reminders) to explore the system's impact on older adults ' social interactions, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and acceptance of the system. Study Design: We conducted a three-month mixed methods evaluation study of the digital companion. Results: Ten female community-dwelling older adults (average age 78.3 years) participated in the study. Overall, participants utilized the tool regularly and appreciated its presence and their interactions. Participants scored higher at the end of the study in cognition and social support scales, and lower in presence of depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Findings indicate the feasibility of a digital companion for people with MCI and inform the need for additional research.
Authors: Annie Hawton; Colin Green; Andy P Dickens; Suzanne H Richards; Rod S Taylor; Rachel Edwards; Colin J Greaves; John L Campbell Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-07-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Timothy W Bickmore; Rebecca A Silliman; Kerrie Nelson; Debbie M Cheng; Michael Winter; Lori Henault; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mélodie Boulay; Samuel Benveniste; Sandra Boespflug; Pierre Jouvelot; Anne-Sophie Rigaud Journal: Technol Health Care Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Nicholas Bott; Sharon Wexler; Lin Drury; Chava Pollak; Victor Wang; Kathleen Scher; Sharon Narducci Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 5.428