Literature DB >> 28268190

The Short Version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale for Older Adults with Diabetes-Convergent, Discriminant and Concurrent Validity: A Pilot Study.

Patricia Hewston1, Nandini Deshpande2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The short version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-6) is advantageous in busy clinical or research settings because it can be administered in less time than the original 16-item Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-16). This pilot study examined the convergent, discriminant and concurrent validity of the ABC-6 in older adults with diabetes mellitus with and without diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
METHODS: Thirty older adults (aged ≥65) were age- and sex-matched in 3 groups: 10 with diabetes (DM group), 10 with diagnosed DPN (DPN group) and 10 without diabetes (no-DM group). Balance confidence was quantified by the ABC-16, which includes the ABC-6. Potential correlates were evaluated in physical and psychological domains.
RESULTS: The ABC-6 and ABC-16 balance confidence scores were strongly correlated (r=0.969; p<0.001; convergent validity). The ABC-6 revealed significant differences in balance confidence between the no-DM and the DM groups (p<0.001; discriminant validity), whereas the ABC-16 did not (p>0.05). The ABC-6 was moderately, but significantly, correlated with physical activity level (r=0.528; p=0.017), mobility (r=-0.520; p=0.027), balance (r=0.633; p=0.003), and depressive symptoms (r=-0.515; p=0.020) in the DM study groups (concurrent validity).
CONCLUSIONS: The ABC-6 and ABC-16 had excellent convergent validity, and both ABC scales had similar concurrent validity. However, the ABC-6 was more sensitive in detecting subtle differences in balance confidence in older adults with diabetes without diagnosed DPN than the ABC-16. Overall, this pilot study provided evidence of the validity of the ABC-6 in older adults with diabetes. Further exploration involving a larger sample size is recommended to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2017 Diabetes Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; balance; balance confidence; chutes; confiance en son équilibre; diabète sucré de type 2; falls; type 2 diabetes mellitus; vieillissement; équilibre

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28268190     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Diabetes        ISSN: 1499-2671            Impact factor:   4.190


  4 in total

1.  The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Confusion Assessment Method Based Scoring System for Delirium Severity (CAM-S).

Authors:  Xinchun Mei; Yupeng Chen; Hailin Zheng; Zhongyong Shi; Edward R Marcantonio; Zhongcong Xie; Yuan Shen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  The Relationship between the Activity Balance Confidence and Mobility Tests among Older Adults in Indonesia.

Authors:  Indri Hapsari Susilowati; Sabarinah Sabarinah; Susiana Nugraha; Sudibyo Alimoeso; Bonardo Prayogo Hasiholan; Supa Pengpid; Karl Peltzer
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Low Vibrational Training as an Additional Intervention for Postural Balance, Balance Confidence and Functional Mobility in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Lower Limb Burn Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zizi M Ibrahim; Olfat Ibrahim Ali; Samah A Moawd; Marwa M Eid; Mona Mohamed Taha
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  The Chinese Short Version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale: Its Validity, Reliability, and Predictive Value for Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Dongting Zhang; Fengmei Tian; Wenjun Gao; Yvfeng Huang; Hui Huang; Liping Tan
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.829

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.