Literature DB >> 28268038

Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in faecal samples from foxes.

Pavlo Maksimov1, Gereon Schares2, Sebastian Press3, Andreas Fröhlich4, Walter Basso5, Mandy Herzig6, Franz J Conraths7.   

Abstract

Effective and sensitive methods for the molecular detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in faecal samples of final hosts are crucial for the prevention and control of human alveolar echinococcosis and for studies on the epidemiology of the parasite. Little is known about the suitability of commercial test kits for isolating DNA of E. multilocularis from fox faeces and the performance of standard Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) protocols in relation to the quality of DNA extracted by these kits. We compared four different kits: ZR Faecal DNA MiniPrep™ (Zymo Research), FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals), QIAamp® Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and NucleoSpin® Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel) for the extraction of DNA from E. multilocularis eggs present in faeces of foxes. Negative faecal samples were spiked with 600, 300, 150, 75, 37, 18, 9, 5 or 2 E. multilocularis eggs, and each egg concentration was tested 10 times with each of the DNA extraction kits. Each extracted DNA sample was amplified using three PCR protocols: i. conventional PCR (cPCR, Platinum®Taq, Invitrogen), ii. qPCR with the iQ™ Supermix (Bio-Rad) and iii. qPCR with the QuantiTect® Multiplex-Master Mix (QIAGEN). The highest analytical sensitivities for molecular detection of E. multilocularis eggs in spiked fox faeces were observed when combining either the QIAamp® Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit or the ZR Faecal DNA MiniPrep™ kit with the qPCR using the QuantiTect® Multiplex-Master Mix (Sensitivities 97% and 94%, respectively). Combinations including the remaining test kits (NucleoSpin® Soil Kit and FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil) showed a markedly lower analytical sensitivity for PCR examinations. The results of the present study indicate that it is of utmost importance to select suitable DNA extraction kits in combination with robust PCR methods or reagents to achieve acceptable analytical sensitivity in the molecular detection of E. multilocularis eggs in fox faecal samples.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional PCR; Copro-inhibition; DNA isolation; Scat; Taeniid eggs; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28268038     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  13 in total

1.  Potential use of high-throughput sequencing of bacterial communities for postmortem submersion interval estimation.

Authors:  Jing He; Juanjuan Guo; Xiaoliang Fu; Jifeng Cai
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Comparison Study of Four Extraction Methods Combined with PCR and LAMP for Feline Tritrichomonas foetus Detection in Fecal Samples.

Authors:  Joanna Dąbrowska; Jacek Karamon; Maciej Kochanowski; Jacek Sroka; Jolanta Zdybel; Tomasz Cencek
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-22

3.  Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies.

Authors:  Fangming Yang; Jihua Sun; Huainian Luo; Huahui Ren; Hongcheng Zhou; Yuxiang Lin; Mo Han; Bing Chen; Hailong Liao; Susanne Brix; Junhua Li; Huanming Yang; Karsten Kristiansen; Huanzi Zhong
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.524

4.  Rapid and Reliable Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis from Faeces Using Droplet Digital PCR.

Authors:  Fabian Bagó; Franz Hoelzl; Felix Knauer; Anna Kübber-Heiss; Steve Smith
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.440

5.  Scrambled eggs: A highly sensitive molecular diagnostic workflow for Fasciola species specific detection from faecal samples.

Authors:  Nichola Eliza Davies Calvani; Peter Andrew Windsor; Russell David Bush; Jan Šlapeta
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-09-15

6.  Surrogate hosts: Hunting dogs and recolonizing grey wolves share their endoparasites.

Authors:  Ines Lesniak; Mathias Franz; Ilja Heckmann; Alex D Greenwood; Heribert Hofer; Oliver Krone
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  A novel protocol to isolate, detect and differentiate taeniid eggs in leafy greens and berries using real-time PCR with melting curve analysis.

Authors:  Caroline F Frey; Jenna R Oakley; Vladislav A Lobanov; Nelson Marreros; Janna M Schurer; Laura F Lalonde
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Validation of PCR-based protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in the final host using the Intestinal Scraping Technique as a reference.

Authors:  P Maksimov; M Isaksson; G Schares; T Romig; F J Conraths
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2019-03-10

9.  Sensitive, quantitative detection of Besnoitia darlingi and related parasites in intermediate hosts and to assess felids as definitive hosts for known and as-yet undescribed related parasite species.

Authors:  Gereon Schares; Jitender P Dubey; Benjamin Rosenthal; Mareen Tuschy; Andrea Bärwald; Franz J Conraths
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.674

10.  Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool.

Authors:  Mio Ayana; Piet Cools; Zeleke Mekonnen; Abdissa Biruksew; Daniel Dana; Nour Rashwan; Roger Prichard; Johnny Vlaminck; Jaco J Verweij; Bruno Levecke
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.