Literature DB >> 28267880

An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.

Marie-Lyne Després-Einspenner1,2, Eric J Howe3, Pierre Drapeau2, Hjalmar S Kühl1,4.   

Abstract

Empirical validations of survey methods for estimating animal densities are rare, despite the fact that only an application to a population of known density can demonstrate their reliability under field conditions and constraints. Here, we present a field validation of camera trapping in combination with spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) methods for enumerating chimpanzee populations. We used 83 camera traps to sample a habituated community of western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of known community and territory size in Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, and estimated community size and density using spatially explicit capture-recapture models. We aimed to: (1) validate camera trapping as a means to collect capture-recapture data for chimpanzees; (2) validate SECR methods to estimate chimpanzee density from camera trap data; (3) compare the efficacy of targeting locations frequently visited by chimpanzees versus deploying cameras according to a systematic design; (4) evaluate the performance of SECR estimators with reduced sampling effort; and (5) identify sources of heterogeneity in detection probabilities. Ten months of camera trapping provided abundant capture-recapture data. All weaned individuals were detected, most of them multiple times, at both an array of targeted locations, and a systematic grid of cameras positioned randomly within the study area, though detection probabilities were higher at targeted locations. SECR abundance estimates were accurate and precise, and analyses of subsets of the data indicated that the majority of individuals in a community could be detected with as few as five traps deployed within their territory. Our results highlight the potential of camera trapping for cost-effective monitoring of chimpanzee populations.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  camera trapping; chimpanzee; density; monitoring; spatially explicit capture-recapture; survey design

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267880     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  7 in total

1.  Animal reactivity to camera traps and its effects on abundance estimate using distance sampling in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Noël Adiko Houa; Noémie Cappelle; Eloi Anderson Bitty; Emmanuelle Normand; Yves Aka Kablan; Christophe Boesch
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  Sooty mangabeys scavenge on nuts cracked by chimpanzees and red river hogs-An investigation of inter-specific interactions around tropical nut trees.

Authors:  Bryndan O C M van Pinxteren; Giulia Sirianni; Paolo Gratton; Marie-Lyne Després-Einspenner; Martijn Egas; Hjalmar Kühl; Juan Lapuente; Amelia C Meier; Karline R L Janmaat
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.

Authors:  J Terrill Paterson; Kelly Proffitt; Ben Jimenez; Jay Rotella; Robert Garrott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Vocal communication in wild chimpanzees: a call rate study.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Crunchant; Fiona A Stewart; Alex K Piel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Between forest and croplands: Nocturnal behavior in wild chimpanzees of Sebitoli, Kibale National Park, Uganda.

Authors:  Camille Lacroux; Benjamin Robira; Nicole Kane-Maguire; Nelson Guma; Sabrina Krief
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  No time to rest: How the effects of climate change on nest decay threaten the conservation of apes in the wild.

Authors:  Mattia Bessone; Lambert Booto; Antonio R Santos; Hjalmar S Kühl; Barbara Fruth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distance and size matters: A comparison of six wildlife camera traps and their usefulness for wild birds.

Authors:  Christoph Randler; Nadine Kalb
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.