Literature DB >> 28267866

Lexicon Development, Consumer Acceptance, and Drivers of Liking of Quinoa Varieties.

Geyang Wu1, Carolyn F Ross1, Craig F Morris2, Kevin M Murphy3.   

Abstract

Quinoa is becoming increasingly popular, with an expanding number of commercially available varieties. To compare the sensory properties of these quinoa varieties, a common sensory lexicon needs to be developed. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop a lexicon of cooked quinoa and examine consumer acceptance of diverse varieties. A trained panel (n = 9) developed aroma, taste/flavor, texture, and color descriptors to describe the sensory properties of 21 quinoa varieties. In addition, texture of the cooked quinoa was determined using a texture analyzer. Results indicated that the developed lexicon could distinguish among these quinoa varieties, showing significant differences in aromas, taste/flavors, and texture attributes. Specifically, quinoa variety effects were observed for the aromas of caramel, nutty, buttery, grassy, earthy, and woody; taste/flavor of sweet, bitter, grain-like, nutty, earthy, and toasty; and firm, cohesive, pasty, adhesive, crunchy, chewy, astringent, and moist textures. Three varieties, "QQ74," "Linares," and "CO407D," exhibited an adhesive texture that has not been described in other commercialized quinoa. Subsequent consumer evaluation (n = 100) on 6 selected samples found that the "Commercial Red" sample was the most accepted overall whereas the least accepted was the field variety "QQ74." For all consumers, overall acceptance of quinoa was driven by higher intensities of grassy aroma, and firm and crunchy texture. Segmentation of the consumers into 4 groups was explored and showed that consumers varied in their acceptance of specific attributes, particularly texture. From the present study, the quinoa lexicon and key drivers of consumer acceptance can be utilized in the industry to evaluate quinoa varieties, product quality and processing procedures.
© 2017 Institute of Food Technologists®.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumer acceptance; lexicon; quinoa; sensory evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267866     DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  3 in total

1.  Development of a Sensory Flavor Lexicon for Mushrooms and Subsequent Characterization of Fresh and Dried Mushrooms.

Authors:  SoonSil Chun; Edgar Chambers; Injun Han
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-07-23

2.  Sensory descriptors for three edible Chilean seaweeds and their relations to umami components and instrumental texture.

Authors:  Valentina Figueroa; Andrea Bunger; Jaime Ortiz; José Miguel Aguilera
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Response of bitter and sweet Chenopodium quinoa varieties to cucumber mosaic virus: Transcriptome and small RNASeq perspective.

Authors:  Nourolah Soltani; Margaret Staton; Kimberly D Gwinn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.