Literature DB >> 28267636

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin and attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in adult patients with haematological malignancy.

C J Byrne1, J A Roberts2, B McWhinney3, S A Ryder1, J P Fennell4, P O'Byrne4, E Deasy4, S Egan4, R Desmond4, H Enright4, D M D'Arcy5, J McHugh4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in adult patients with haematological malignancies receiving higher than standard doses, and to perform Monte Carlo simulations to determine dosing regimens associated with optimal teicoplanin concentrations.
METHODS: This was a hospital-based clinical trial (EudraCT 2013-004535-72). Nine blood samples were collected on Day 3, plus single trough samples on Days 7 and 10, and 24 and 48 hours after the last dose. Teicoplanin minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined for Gram-positive isolates from study patients. Population pharmacokinetic analyses and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were undertaken using Pmetrics.
RESULTS: Thirty adult haematological malignancy patients were recruited with a mean (SD) loading dose, age, total body weight, and creatinine clearance of 9.5 (1.9) mg/kg, 63 (12) years, 69.1 (15.8) kg, and 72 (41) mL/min, respectively. A three-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model best described the teicoplanin concentration data. Covariates supported for inclusion in the final model were creatinine clearance for clearance and total body weight for volume of the central compartment. The median (IQR) area under the concentration-time curve from 48 to 72 hours (AUC48-72h) was 679 (319) mg.h/L. There was a strong correlation between the AUC48-72h and trough concentration at 72 hours (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.957, p <0.001). Dosing simulations showed that administration of five loading doses at 12-hourly intervals, stratified by total body weight and creatinine clearance, increased the probability of achieving target concentrations within 72 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: To increase the number of patients achieving optimal teicoplanin concentrations an individualized dosing approach, based on body weight and creatinine clearance, is recommended.
Copyright © 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycopeptides; Haematological malignancy; Monte Carlo simulations; Population pharmacokinetics; Teicoplanin; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267636     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  8 in total

1.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Authors:  A Kontou; K Sarafidis; O Begou; H G Gika; A Tsiligiannis; K Ogungbenro; A Dokoumetzidis; E Agakidou; E Roilides
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Optimization of Teicoplanin in Children With Different Renal Functions.

Authors:  Liuliu Gao; Hua Xu; Qi Ye; Sichan Li; Jun Wang; Yan Mei; Changhe Niu; Ting Kang; Chen Chen; Yang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Clinical efficacy and safety in patients treated with teicoplanin with a target trough concentration of 20 μg/mL using a regimen of 12 mg/kg for five doses within the initial 3 days.

Authors:  Takashi Ueda; Yoshio Takesue; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Kaoru Ichiki; Kaori Ishikawa; Yoshiko Takai; Kumiko Yamada; Toshie Tsuchida; Naruhito Otani; Yoshiko Takahashi; Mika Ishihara; Shingo Takubo; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Motoi Uchino; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Pediatric Patients with Normal versus Impaired Renal Function.

Authors:  Joon Sik Choi; Jong Min Kim; Dongsub Kim; Si Ho Kim; Heeyeon Cho; Hyung Doo Park; Soo Youn Lee; Cheol In Kang; Yae Jean Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Quantification of Teicoplanin Using the HPLC-UV Method for Clinical Applications in Critically Ill Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Jaeok Lee; Eun-Kyoung Chung; Sung-Wook Kang; Hwa-Jeong Lee; Sandy-Jeong Rhie
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Construction and Interpretation of Prediction Model of Teicoplanin Trough Concentration via Machine Learning.

Authors:  Pan Ma; Ruixiang Liu; Wenrui Gu; Qing Dai; Yu Gan; Jing Cen; Shenglan Shang; Fang Liu; Yongchuan Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-08

8.  Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  John Asumang; Katie L Heard; Oliver Troise; Sandra Fahmy; Nabeela Mughal; Luke S P Moore; Stephen Hughes
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-02-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.