Literature DB >> 28267606

No Differences in Population-based Readmissions After Open and Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Implications for Post-discharge Care.

Tudor Borza1, Bruce L Jacobs2, Jeffrey S Montgomery3, Alon Z Weizer3, Todd M Morgan3, Khaled S Hafez3, Cheryl T Lee3, Benjamin Y Li4, Hye Sung Min4, Chang He4, Scott M Gilbert5, Jonathan E Helm6, Mariel S Lavieri7, Brent K Hollenbeck8, Ted A Skolarus9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To inform whether readmission reduction strategies should consider surgical approach, we examined readmission differences between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using population-based data.
METHODS: We identified patients who underwent cystectomy between January 2010 and September 2013 based on International Classification of Diseases-9th edition codes and administrative claims from a large, national US health insurer (Clinformatics Data Mart Database, OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN). We assessed post-discharge health system utilization and tested for differences in readmissions after the 2 surgical approaches.
RESULTS: We identified 935 patients treated with cystectomy: open = 785 (84%) and RARC = 150 (16%). Patients undergoing RARC were slightly older, male, had more ileal conduit urinary reconstruction, and less need for intensive care. Index length of stay was shorter for RARC than for open surgery (7 days vs 8 days, P < .001). However, we found no differences in 30-day readmission rates (24% open vs 29% RARC, P = .26) or other readmission parameters, including readmission length of stay (5 days open vs 4 days RARC, P = .32), emergency department use (22% open vs 24% RARC, P = .86), reasons for readmission, or timing of first outpatient visits (11.5 days open vs 9 days RARC, P = .41). For both approaches, the majority of patients were readmitted within 2 weeks.
CONCLUSION: The surgical approach to cystectomy does not appear to impact readmissions. Strategies to reduce the readmission burden after cystectomy do not need to consider surgical approach but should focus on timing of medical contacts.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267606      PMCID: PMC5449208          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of early postoperative morbidity after robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michael Musch; Maxim Janowski; Antonia Steves; Ulla Roggenbuck; Andre Boergers; Yadollah Davoudi; Heinrich Loewen; Harold Groeben; Darko Kroepfl
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Variation in readmission by hospital after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Donald J Lucas; Aslam Ejaz; Danielle A Bischof; Eric B Schneider; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Patient, treatment and discharge factors associated with hospital readmission within 30 days after surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Rachel M Clark; Whitfield B Growdon; Andrew Wiechert; David Boruta; Marcela Del Carmen; Anne Kathryn Goodman; Leslie Bradford; Alejandro Rauh-Hain; John O Schorge
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Siamak Daneshmand; Hamed Ahmadi; Anne K Schuckman; Anirban P Mitra; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Hooman Djaladat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Stephen W Reese; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joaquim Bellmunt; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Benjamin I Chung; Adam S Kibel; Steven L Chang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Hitendra R H Patel; Yannick Cerantola; Massimo Valerio; Beata Persson; Patrice Jichlinski; Olle Ljungqvist; Martin Hubner; Wassim Kassouf; Stig Müller; Gabriele Baldini; Francesco Carli; Torvind Naesheim; Lars Ytrebo; Arthur Revhaug; Kristoffer Lassen; Tore Knutsen; Erling Aarsaether; Peter Wiklund; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Root Causes and Modifiability of 30-Day Hospital Readmissions after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew C James; Jason P Izard; Sarah K Holt; Joshua K Calvert; Jonathan L Wright; Michael P Porter; John L Gore
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal.

Authors:  Irina Yermilov; David Bentrem; Evan Sekeris; Sushma Jain; Melinda A Maggard; Clifford Y Ko; James S Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Age-related trends in cardiometabolic disease among adults with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Neil Kamdar; Edward A Hurvitz
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Characterising 'bounce-back' readmissions after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Ted A Skolarus; Bruce L Jacobs; Yongmei Qin; Benjamin Li; Michael Sessine; Xiang Liu; Kevin Zhu; Scott M Gilbert; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ken Urish; Jonathan Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Tudor Borza
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Functional Status in Patients Requiring Nursing Home Stay After Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Katie S Murray; Megan Prunty; Alex Henderson; Tyler Haden; Naveen Pokala; Bin Ge; Mark Wakefield; Gregory F Petroski; David R Mehr; Robin L Kruse
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Real-World Impact of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Cystectomy on Perioperative Outcomes and Spending.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Brent K Hollenbeck; Mary Oerline; Alon Z Weizer; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Andrew M Ryan; Chad Ellimoottil
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Spillover Effects of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program on Radical Cystectomy Readmissions.

Authors:  Matthew S Lee; Brent K Hollenbeck; Mary K Oerline; Ted A Skolarus; Bruce L Jacobs; Rita Jen; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Vahakn Shahinian; Tudor Borza
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2018-10-07

6.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 7.  Bioengineering solutions for ureteric disorders: clinical need, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kapetanos; Alexander Light; Niyukta Thakare; Krishnaa Mahbubani; Kasra Saeb-Parsy; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.