Literature DB >> 28267552

Safety issues and updates under MR environments.

Soo Jung Kim1, Kyung Ah Kim2.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a useful imaging tool with superior soft tissue contrast for diagnostic evaluation. The MR environments poses unique risks to patients and employees differently from ionizing radiation exposure originated from computed tomography and plain x-ray films. The technology associated with MR system has evolved continuously since its introduction in the late 1970s. MR systems have advanced with static magnetic fields, faster and stronger gradient magnetic fields and more powerful radiofrequency transmission coils. Higher field strengths of MR offers greater signal to noise capability and better spatial resolution, resulting in better visualization of anatomic detail, with a reduction in scan time. With the rapid evolution of technology associated with MR, we encounter new MR-related circumstances and unexpected dangerous conditions. A comprehensive update of our knowledge about MR safety is necessary to prevent MR-related accidents and to ensure safety for patients and staff associated with MR. This review presents an overview about MR-related safety issues and updates.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologic effects; Magnetic field; Magnetic resonance (MR); Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267552     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

Review 1.  Practical considerations for establishing and maintaining a magnetic resonance imaging safety program in a pediatric practice.

Authors:  Tushar Chandra; Govind B Chavhan; Raymond W Sze; David Swenson; Stephanie Holowka; Stanley Fricke; Scott Davidson; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 2.  Acute ocular pain during magnetic resonance imaging due to retained intraocular metallic foreign body: the role of ultrasonography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in diagnosis and management of this condition.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mamas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Dimitrios Brouzas; Andreas Diagourtas; Andreas Droulias; Ilias Georgalas; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-02

Review 3.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  A narrative review of current and emerging MRI safety issues: What every MRI technologist (radiographer) needs to know.

Authors:  Lisa Mittendorff; Adrienne Young; Jenny Sim
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-09-09

5.  Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Carlo Sansotta; Maria Sole Morelli; Barbara Testagrossa; Giuseppe Acri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Comparison of biannual ultrasonography and annual non-contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance tools for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis (MAGNUS-HCC): a study protocol.

Authors:  Hyun A Kim; Kyung Ah Kim; Joon-Il Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Chang Hee Lee; Tae Wook Kang; Young-Mi Ku; Su Lim Lee; Yang Shin Park; Jeong Hee Yoon; Seong Hyun Kim; Moon Hyung Choi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Multichromatic near-infrared imaging to assess interstitial lymphatic and venous uptake in vivo.

Authors:  Fabrice C Bernard; Jarred Kaiser; Sarvgna K Raval; Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Thanh N Doan; Nick J Willett; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.170

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.