Literature DB >> 28267549

Improved cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound by radiologists using Computer Aided Detection.

J C M van Zelst1, T Tan2, B Platel2, M de Jong3, A Steenbakkers2, M Mourits3, A Grivegnee4, C Borelli5, N Karssemeijer2, R M Mann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of dedicated Computer Aided Detection (CAD) software for automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) on the performance of radiologists screening for breast cancer.
METHODS: 90 ABUS views of 90 patients were randomly selected from a multi-institutional archive of cases collected between 2010 and 2013. This dataset included normal cases (n=40) with >1year of follow up, benign (n=30) lesions that were either biopsied or remained stable, and malignant lesions (n=20). Six readers evaluated all cases with and without CAD in two sessions. CAD-software included conventional CAD-marks and an intelligent minimum intensity projection of the breast tissue. Readers reported using a likelihood-of-malignancy scale from 0 to 100. Alternative free-response ROC analysis was used to measure the performance.
RESULTS: Without CAD, the average area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the readers was 0.77 and significantly improved with CAD to 0.84 (p=0.001). Sensitivity of all readers improved (range 5.2-10.6%) by using CAD but specificity decreased in four out of six readers (range 1.4-5.7%). No significant difference was observed in the AUC between experienced radiologists and residents both with and without CAD.
CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated CAD-software for ABUS has the potential to improve the cancer detection rates of radiologists screening for breast cancer.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated breast ultrasound; Breast cancer; Computer Aided Detection; Detection; Screening; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267549     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  Should We Ignore, Follow, or Biopsy? Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support on Breast Ultrasound Lesion Assessment.

Authors:  Victoria L Mango; Mary Sun; Ralph T Wynn; Richard Ha
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Performance of novel deep learning network with the incorporation of the automatic segmentation network for diagnosis of breast cancer in automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Qiucheng Wang; He Chen; Gongning Luo; Bo Li; Haitao Shang; Hua Shao; Shanshan Sun; Zhongshuai Wang; Kuanquan Wang; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Study on automatic detection and classification of breast nodule using deep convolutional neural network system.

Authors:  Feiqian Wang; Xiaotong Liu; Na Yuan; Buyue Qian; Litao Ruan; Changchang Yin; Ciping Jin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Palpable Breast Lump Triage by Minimally Trained Operators in Mexico Using Computer-Assisted Diagnosis and Low-Cost Ultrasound.

Authors:  Susan M Love; Wendie A Berg; Christine Podilchuk; Ana Lilia López Aldrete; Aarón Patricio Gaxiola Mascareño; Krishnamohan Pathicherikollamparambil; Ananth Sankarasubramanian; Leah Eshraghi; Richard Mammone
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Hak Hee Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Multi-modal trained artificial intelligence solution to triage chest X-ray for COVID-19 using pristine ground-truth, versus radiologists.

Authors:  Tao Tan; Bipul Das; Ravi Soni; Mate Fejes; Hongxu Yang; Sohan Ranjan; Daniel Attila Szabo; Vikram Melapudi; K S Shriram; Utkarsh Agrawal; Laszlo Rusko; Zita Herczeg; Barbara Darazs; Pal Tegzes; Lehel Ferenczi; Rakesh Mullick; Gopal Avinash
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Jan C M van Zelst; Tao Tan; Paola Clauser; Angels Domingo; Monique D Dorrius; Daniel Drieling; Michael Golatta; Francisca Gras; Mathijn de Jong; Ruud Pijnappel; Matthieu J C M Rutten; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Analysis of the Cluster Prominence Feature for Detecting Calcifications in Mammograms.

Authors:  Alejandra Cruz-Bernal; Martha M Flores-Barranco; Dora L Almanza-Ojeda; Sergio Ledesma; Mario A Ibarra-Manzano
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Diagnostic performance of machine learning applied to texture analysis-derived features for breast lesion characterisation at automated breast ultrasound: a pilot study.

Authors:  Magda Marcon; Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Anton S Becker; Nicole Berger; Moritz C Wurnig; Matthias W Wagner; Thomas Frauenfelder; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  Ultrasonographic morphological characteristics determined using a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic system of breast cancer.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Seung Eun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Soo-Yeon Kim; Young Kyung Bae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.