Thomas Werncke1, Lena Sonnow2, Bernhard C Meyer2, Matthias Lüpke3, Jan Hinrichs2, Frank K Wacker2, Christian von Falck2. 1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Werncke.Thomas@mh-hannover.de. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. 3. University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Institute for General Radiology and Medical Physics, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Objective of this phantom and cadaveric study was to compare the effective radiation dose (ED) and image quality (IQ) between C-arm computed tomography (CACT) using an ultra-high resolution 1×1 binning with a standard 16-slice CT (MDCT) arthrography of the wrist. METHODS: ED was determined with thermoluminescence dosimetry using an anthropomorphic phantom and different patient positions. Imaging was conducted in 10 human cadaveric wrists after tri-compartmental injection of diluted iodinated contrast material and a wire phantom. IQ of MDCT was compared with CACT reconstructed with a soft (CACT1) and sharp (CACT2) kernel. High and low contrast resolution was determined. Three radiologists assessed IQ of wrist structures and occurrence of image artifacts using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: ED of MDCT was comparable to standard CACT (4.3μSv/3.7μSv). High contrast resolution was best for CACT2, decreased to CACT1 and MDCT. Low contrast resolution increased between CACT2 and MDCT (P<0.001). IQ was best for CACT2 (1.3±0.5), decreased to CACT1 (1.9±0.6) and MDCT (3.5±0.6). Non-compromising artifacts were only reported for CACT. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this phantom and cadaveric study indicate that ultra-high resolution C-Arm CT arthrography of the wrist bears the potential to outperform MDCT arthrography in terms of image quality and workflow at the cost of mildly increasing image artifacts while radiation dose to the patient is comparably low for both, MDCT and C-Arm CT.
OBJECTIVE: Objective of this phantom and cadaveric study was to compare the effective radiation dose (ED) and image quality (IQ) between C-arm computed tomography (CACT) using an ultra-high resolution 1×1 binning with a standard 16-slice CT (MDCT) arthrography of the wrist. METHODS: ED was determined with thermoluminescence dosimetry using an anthropomorphic phantom and different patient positions. Imaging was conducted in 10 human cadaveric wrists after tri-compartmental injection of diluted iodinated contrast material and a wire phantom. IQ of MDCT was compared with CACT reconstructed with a soft (CACT1) and sharp (CACT2) kernel. High and low contrast resolution was determined. Three radiologists assessed IQ of wrist structures and occurrence of image artifacts using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: ED of MDCT was comparable to standard CACT (4.3μSv/3.7μSv). High contrast resolution was best for CACT2, decreased to CACT1 and MDCT. Low contrast resolution increased between CACT2 and MDCT (P<0.001). IQ was best for CACT2 (1.3±0.5), decreased to CACT1 (1.9±0.6) and MDCT (3.5±0.6). Non-compromising artifacts were only reported for CACT. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this phantom and cadaveric study indicate that ultra-high resolution C-Arm CT arthrography of the wrist bears the potential to outperform MDCT arthrography in terms of image quality and workflow at the cost of mildly increasing image artifacts while radiation dose to the patient is comparably low for both, MDCT and C-Arm CT.
Authors: L Sonnow; S Koennecker; R Luketina; T Werncke; J B Hinrichs; B C Meyer; F K Wacker; C von Falck Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 5.315