Literature DB >> 28267245

Scale-dependent complementarity of climatic velocity and environmental diversity for identifying priority areas for conservation under climate change.

Carlos Carroll1, David R Roberts2, Julia L Michalak3, Joshua J Lawler3, Scott E Nielsen4, Diana Stralberg4, Andreas Hamann4, Brad H Mcrae5, Tongli Wang6.   

Abstract

As most regions of the earth transition to altered climatic conditions, new methods are needed to identify refugia and other areas whose conservation would facilitate persistence of biodiversity under climate change. We compared several common approaches to conservation planning focused on climate resilience over a broad range of ecological settings across North America and evaluated how commonalities in the priority areas identified by different methods varied with regional context and spatial scale. Our results indicate that priority areas based on different environmental diversity metrics differed substantially from each other and from priorities based on spatiotemporal metrics such as climatic velocity. Refugia identified by diversity or velocity metrics were not strongly associated with the current protected area system, suggesting the need for additional conservation measures including protection of refugia. Despite the inherent uncertainties in predicting future climate, we found that variation among climatic velocities derived from different general circulation models and emissions pathways was less than the variation among the suite of environmental diversity metrics. To address uncertainty created by this variation, planners can combine priorities identified by alternative metrics at a single resolution and downweight areas of high variation between metrics. Alternately, coarse-resolution velocity metrics can be combined with fine-resolution diversity metrics in order to leverage the respective strengths of the two groups of metrics as tools for identification of potential macro- and microrefugia that in combination maximize both transient and long-term resilience to climate change. Planners should compare and integrate approaches that span a range of model complexity and spatial scale to match the range of ecological and physical processes influencing persistence of biodiversity and identify a conservation network resilient to threats operating at multiple scales.
© 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  climate change adaptation; climatic velocity; conservation planning; environmental diversity; land facets; protected areas; refugia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267245     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  8 in total

1.  Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration.

Authors:  Joshua J Lawler; D Scott Rinnan; Julia L Michalak; John C Withey; Christopher R Randels; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The geodiv r package: Tools for calculating gradient surface metrics.

Authors:  Annie C Smith; Kyla M Dahlin; Sydne Record; Jennifer K Costanza; Adam M Wilson; Phoebe L Zarnetske
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.335

3.  Assessing agreement among alternative climate change projections to inform conservation recommendations in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  R Travis Belote; Carlos Carroll; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Julia Michalak; John W Williams; Matthew A Williamson; Gregory H Aplet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Effects of Interaction between Climate Change and Land-Use/Cover Change on Biodiversity-Related Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  Xinyue He; Jie Liang; Guangming Zeng; Yujie Yuan; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2019-05-06

5.  Predicted climate shifts within terrestrial protected areas worldwide.

Authors:  Samuel Hoffmann; Severin D H Irl; Carl Beierkuhnlein
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  High-resolution land value maps reveal underestimation of conservation costs in the United States.

Authors:  Christoph Nolte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Rewilding in the face of climate change.

Authors:  Carlos Carroll; Reed F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Climate-change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane.

Authors:  Toni Lyn Morelli; Cameron W Barrows; Aaron R Ramirez; Jennifer M Cartwright; David D Ackerly; Tatiana D Eaves; Joseph L Ebersole; Meg A Krawchuk; Benjamin H Letcher; Mary F Mahalovich; Garrett W Meigs; Julia L Michalak; Constance I Millar; Rebecca M Quiñones; Diana Stralberg; James H Thorne
Journal:  Front Ecol Environ       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.123

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.