Literature DB >> 28267056

Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The approach of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer has evolved in many ways since its introduction 20 years ago. There is a great deal of ongoing research addressing the molecular genetics and clinical outcome of low-risk disease, the use of MRI and biomarkers, and the role of lifestyle and dietary modifications. The major developments in the field are reviewed in this article. RECENT
FINDINGS: Low risk and many cases of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer are indolent, have little or no metastatic potential, and do not pose a threat to the patient in his lifetime. These are termed clinically insignificant. Studies over the last 20 years have advanced our understanding of who these patients are, and promoted the use of conservative management in such individuals. A key component of this approach is the early identification of those patients who have been misattributed as having low-risk disease, who in fact harbor higher risk disease and are likely to benefit from definitive therapy. This represents about 30% of newly diagnosed low-risk patients. A further small proportion of patients with low-risk disease demonstrate biological progression to higher grade disease. Extent of Gleason 6 on biopsy, Prostate Specific Antigen density, and race are predictors for the likelihood of coexistent higher grade cancer.
SUMMARY: The results of active surveillance, embodying conservative management with selective, delayed intervention for the subset who are reclassified as higher risk over time based on repeat biopsy, imaging, or biomarker results, have shown that this approach is safe in the intermediate to long term, with a 0.5-3% cancer-specific mortality at 10-15 years. Further refinement incorporating MRI and targeted biopsies is the subject of intensive research at the moment, and promises to improve the safety and precision of conservative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28267056     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Active surveillance in prostate cancer].

Authors:  E Erne; S Kaufmann; K Nikolaou; A Stenzl; J Bedke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Nicole Benfante; Ricardo Alvim; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michal Wiseman; Maha Mamoor; Behfar Ehdaie; Vincent Laudone; Peter Scardino; James Eastham; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Long-Term Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Nicole Benfante; Ricardo Alvim; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michal Wiseman; Maha Mamoor; Behfar Ehdaie; Vincent Laudone; Peter Scardino; James Eastham; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Glenda Kith; Sarah Lisker; Urmimala Sarkar; Jill Barr-Walker; Benjamin N Breyer; Nynikka R Palmer
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-06

5.  Can active surveillance really reduce the harms of overdiagnosing prostate cancer? A reflection of real life clinical practice in the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Frank-Jan H Drost; Antti Rannikko; Riccardo Valdagni; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sebastiaan Remmers; Henk G van der Poel; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

Review 6.  Epigenetic Signature: A New Player as Predictor of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (PCa) in Patients on Active Surveillance (AS).

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Paola Ungaro; Amelia Cimmino; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Gian Maria Busetto; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Daniela Terracciano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA.

Authors:  Igor Brikun; Deborah Nusskern; Andrew Decatus; Eric Harvey; Lin Li; Diha Freije
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 6.551

8.  The effect of time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy on adverse pathologic outcomes.

Authors:  Premal Patel; Ryan Sun; Benjamin Shiff; Kiril Trpkov; Geoffrey Thomas Gotto
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela K Shill; Monique J Roobol; Behfar Ehdaie; Andrew J Vickers; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

10.  The Prognostic PDE4D7 Score in a Diagnostic Biopsy Prostate Cancer Patient Cohort with Longitudinal Biological Outcomes.

Authors:  Dianne van Strijp; Christiane de Witz; Pieter C Vos; Eveline den Biezen-Timmermans; Anne van Brussel; Janneke Wrobel; George S Baillie; Pierre Tennstedt; Thorsten Schlomm; Birthe Heitkötter; Sebastian Huss; Martin Bögemann; Miles D Houslay; Chris Bangma; Axel Semjonow; Ralf Hoffmann
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2018-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.