Literature DB >> 28266017

What can morphology tell us about ecology of four invasive goby species?

K Jakubčinová1, P Simonović2, B Števove1, J Čanak Atlagić3, V Kováč1.   

Abstract

This study presents a detailed comparative analysis of external morphology of four of the most invasive goby species in Europe (round goby Neogobius melanostomus, bighead goby Ponticola kessleri, monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis and racer goby Ponticola gymnotrachelus) and interprets some ecological requirements of these species based on their morphological attributes. The results are evaluated within an ontogenetic context, and the morphological differences between the species are discussed in terms of the question: can special external shape adaptations help to assess the invasive potential of each species? The morphometric analyses demonstrate important differences between the four invasive gobies. Neogobius melanostomus appears to have the least specialized external morphology that may favour its invasive success: little specialization to habitat or diet means reduced restraints on overall ecological requirements. The other three species were found to possess some morphological specializations (P. kessleri to large prey, N. fluviatilis to sandy habitats and P. gymnotrachelus to macrophytes), but none of these gobies have managed to colonize such large areas or to reach such overall abundances as N. melanostomus.
© 2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ponto-Caspian gobies; eco-morphology; invasion potential; morphometric analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28266017     DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  2 in total

1.  Functional feeding traits as predictors of invasive success of alien freshwater fish species using a food-fish model.

Authors:  Leopold A J Nagelkerke; Eline van Onselen; Nils van Kessel; Rob S E W Leuven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of preservation on fish morphology over time: Implications for morphological studies.

Authors:  V Alex Sotola; Cody A Craig; Peter J Pfaff; Jeremy D Maikoetter; Noland H Martin; Timothy H Bonner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.