Literature DB >> 28265825

Diagnostic Accuracy of Laboratory Tests and Diagnostic Imaging in Detecting Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation.

Divyanshoo R Kohli1,2, Ravi Vachhani3, Tilak U Shah3,4, Doumit S BouHaidar3, M Shadab Siddiqui3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often required to diagnose post-liver transplant (LT) biliary strictures. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive laboratory and imaging tests in detecting post-LT biliary strictures.
METHODS: Adult LT recipients who underwent ERCP between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated. Biliary strictures were diagnosed after blinded review of cholangiograms by three interventional endoscopists. The accuracy of liver enzymes, ultrasound, and MRI was determined using cholangiography as the reference standard. To evaluate the accuracy of change in liver enzymes, the difference between baseline and liver enzymes prior to ERCP (Δlab) was utilized.
RESULTS: Biliary strictures were present on cholangiogram in 48 (58%) of 82 LT recipients meeting inclusion criteria. Baseline liver enzyme values did not differ significantly between patients with and without strictures. The optimal cutoffs for ΔALT, ΔAST, Δbilirubin, and Δalkaline phosphatase (AP) were determined to be 174 IU/L, 75 IU/L, 3.1 mg/dL, and 225 IU/L, respectively. ΔALT had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 43%, and negative predictive value 100%. ΔAP had the highest specificity (53%) but modest sensitivity (69%) with a positive predictive value of 67%. Ultrasound had sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 69%, while MRI had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 56%. DISCUSSION: The diagnostic accuracy of liver enzymes and imaging modalities is modest in detecting post-LT biliary strictures and cannot be used solely to identify patients needing further workup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary stricture; Diagnostic accuracy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Liver transplant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265825     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4515-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Diagnosis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: which is the best tool?

Authors:  Thomas Zoepf; Evelyn-J Maldonado-Lopez; Philip Hilgard; Alexander Dechêne; Massimo Malago; Christoph E Broelsch; Joerg Schlaak; Guido Gerken
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Management of Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Nicolas A Villa; M Edwyn Harrison
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-05

3.  Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of biliary complications after liver transplantation: An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Carlos Macías-Gómez; Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-10

5.  A simple modification in operative technique can reduce the incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  H N Sankary; L McChesney; E Frye; S Cohn; P Foster; J Williams
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Laboratory diagnosis and nonoperative management of biliary complications in living donor liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Mukund Venu; Russell D Brown; Rita Lepe; Jamie Berkes; Scott J Cotler; Enrico Benedetti; Giuliano Testa; Rama P Venu
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ivo W Graziadei; Hubert Schwaighofer; Robert Koch; Karin Nachbaur; Alfred Koenigsrainer; Raimund Margreiter; Wolfgang Vogel
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  Post-operative imaging in liver transplantation: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Giuseppe Como; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Late liver function test abnormalities post-adult liver transplantation: a review of the etiology, investigation, and management.

Authors:  Oscar Mitchell; Arif M Cosar; Mohammad U Malik; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 10.  Current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Chang; Inseok Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi; Sok Won Han
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interobserver Agreement for Classifying Post-liver Transplant Biliary Strictures in Donation After Circulatory Death Donors.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; Rahul Pannala; Michael D Crowell; Norio Fukami; Douglas O Faigel; Bashar A Aqel; M Edwyn Harrison
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Early laboratory values after liver transplantation are associated with anastomotic biliary strictures.

Authors:  Matthew Fasullo; Priyanush Kandakatla; Reza Amerinasab; Divyanshoo Rai Kohli; Tilak Shah; Samarth Patel; Chandra Bhati; Doumit Bouhaidar; Mohammad S Siddiqui; Ravi Vachhani
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 3.  Post-transplant biliary complications: advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Matthew Fasullo; Milan Patel; Lauren Khanna; Tilak Shah
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05

4.  Predictors of Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation Among Recipients of DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) Grafts.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; M Edwyn Harrison; Abimbola O Adike; Bara El Kurdi; Norio Fukami; Douglas O Faigel; Rahul Pannala; Adyr A Moss; Bashar A Aqel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.