Literature DB >> 28265720

Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll.

Felipe Murtinho1, Tanya Hayes2.   

Abstract

Payment for Environmental Service programs are increasingly applied in communal settings where resource users collectively join the program and agree to limit their shared use of a common-property resource. Who decides to join PES and the degree to which community members agree with the collective decision is critical for the success of said programs. Yet, we have limited understanding of the factors that influence communal participation and the collective decision process. This paper examines communal participation in a national payment for conservation program in Ecuador. We use quantitative and qualitative analysis to (i) identify the attributes of the communities that participate (or not), and factors that facilitate participation (n = 67), and (ii) assess household preference and alignment with the collective decision to participate (n = 212). Household participation preferences indicate varying degrees of consensus with the collective decision to participate, with those using the resource less likely to support participation. At the communal level, however, our results indicate that over time, those communities that depend more heavily on their resource systems may ultimately choose to participate. Our findings suggest that communal governance structures and outside organizations may be instrumental in gaining participation in resource-dependent communities and building consensus. Findings also point to the need for further research on communal decision-processes to ensure that the collective decision is based on an informed and democratic process.

Keywords:  Collective action; Common-pool resource; Conservation; Ecosystem services; Latin America; Páramo

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265720     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0838-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  The future of payments for environmental services.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment.

Authors:  Daniel Decaro; Michael Stokes
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Environment and Development. Get the science right when paying for nature's services.

Authors:  S Naeem; J C Ingram; A Varga; T Agardy; P Barten; G Bennett; E Bloomgarden; L L Bremer; P Burkill; M Cattau; C Ching; M Colby; D C Cook; R Costanza; F DeClerck; C Freund; T Gartner; R Goldman-Benner; J Gunderson; D Jarrett; A P Kinzig; A Kiss; A Koontz; P Kumar; J R Lasky; M Masozera; D Meyers; F Milano; L Naughton-Treves; E Nichols; L Olander; P Olmsted; E Perge; C Perrings; S Polasky; J Potent; C Prager; F Quétier; K Redford; K Saterson; G Thoumi; M T Vargas; S Vickerman; W Weisser; D Wilkie; S Wunder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands.

Authors:  Andrew J Dougill; Lindsay C Stringer; Julia Leventon; Mike Riddell; Henri Rueff; Dominick V Spracklen; Edward Butt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Recall bias: a proposal for assessment and control.

Authors:  K Raphael
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Listening to locals on payments for environmental services.

Authors:  Lisa Petheram; Bruce M Campbell
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.789

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Study on the quantification of ecological compensation in a river basin considering different industries based on water pollution loss value.

Authors:  Xinjian Guan; Shengling Hou; Yu Meng; Wenkang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.