W Joseph Herring1,2, Kathryn M Connor3, Ellen Snyder3, Duane B Snavely3, Ying Zhang3, Jill Hutzelmann3, Deborah Matzura-Wolfe3, Ruth M Benca4, Andrew D Krystal5, James K Walsh6, Christopher Lines3, Thomas Roth7, David Michelson3. 1. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. william_herring@merck.com. 2. Merck & Co., Inc., UG 4C-13, PO Box 1000, North Wales, PA, 19454-1099, USA. william_herring@merck.com. 3. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 6. Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St., Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. 7. Henry Ford Hospital Sleep Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Sex-related differences in the clinical profiles of some insomnia medications have been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical profile of suvorexant, a novel orexin receptor antagonist approved for treating insomnia at doses up to 20 mg, by sex subgroups. METHODS:Efficacy analyses by sex were based on pooled data from two similar phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-month trials in elderly (≥65 years) and non-elderly (18-64 years) insomnia patients. Two age-adjusted (non-elderly/elderly) dose regimes of 40/30 and 20/15 mg were evaluated, with fewer patients assigned to 20/15 mg. Efficacy was assessed by patient-reported outcomes (N = 1264 women, 707 men) and by polysomnography endpoints in ~75% of patients. Safety analyses by sex (N = 1744 women, 1065 men) included pooled data from the two 3-month trials plus 3-month data from a safety trial of 40/30 mg. RESULTS: The sex subgroup efficacy analyses mirrored the improvements seen for suvorexant 40/30 and 20/15 mg over placebo on patient-reported outcomes and polysomnography sleep maintenance and onset endpoints in the primary analyses; 95% CIs excluded zero in favor of suvorexant for most endpoints in both sexes, and similar efficacy was observed between sexes (95% CIs overlapped). Suvorexant was well-tolerated in women and men, although women in all treatment groups (including placebo) reported more adverse events than men. The most frequent adverse event was somnolence (women: 11.1% for 40/30 mg, 8.5% for 20/15 mg, 2.3% for placebo; men: 10.1% for 40/30 mg, 3.4% for 20/15 mg, 4.2% for placebo). CONCLUSION:Suvorexant was generally effective and well-tolerated in both women and men with insomnia. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration numbers: NCT01097616, NCT01097629, NCT01021813.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Sex-related differences in the clinical profiles of some insomnia medications have been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical profile of suvorexant, a novel orexin receptor antagonist approved for treating insomnia at doses up to 20 mg, by sex subgroups. METHODS: Efficacy analyses by sex were based on pooled data from two similar phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-month trials in elderly (≥65 years) and non-elderly (18-64 years) insomniapatients. Two age-adjusted (non-elderly/elderly) dose regimes of 40/30 and 20/15 mg were evaluated, with fewer patients assigned to 20/15 mg. Efficacy was assessed by patient-reported outcomes (N = 1264 women, 707 men) and by polysomnography endpoints in ~75% of patients. Safety analyses by sex (N = 1744 women, 1065 men) included pooled data from the two 3-month trials plus 3-month data from a safety trial of 40/30 mg. RESULTS: The sex subgroup efficacy analyses mirrored the improvements seen for suvorexant 40/30 and 20/15 mg over placebo on patient-reported outcomes and polysomnography sleep maintenance and onset endpoints in the primary analyses; 95% CIs excluded zero in favor of suvorexant for most endpoints in both sexes, and similar efficacy was observed between sexes (95% CIs overlapped). Suvorexant was well-tolerated in women and men, although women in all treatment groups (including placebo) reported more adverse events than men. The most frequent adverse event was somnolence (women: 11.1% for 40/30 mg, 8.5% for 20/15 mg, 2.3% for placebo; men: 10.1% for 40/30 mg, 3.4% for 20/15 mg, 4.2% for placebo). CONCLUSION:Suvorexant was generally effective and well-tolerated in both women and men with insomnia. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration numbers: NCT01097616, NCT01097629, NCT01021813.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gender differences; Insomnia; Men; Orexin; Sex differences; Suvorexant; Women
Authors: Jessica A Mong; Fiona C Baker; Megan M Mahoney; Ketema N Paul; Michael D Schwartz; Kazue Semba; Rae Silver Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: David Michelson; Ellen Snyder; Erin Paradis; Mary Chengan-Liu; Duane B Snavely; Jill Hutzelmann; James K Walsh; Andrew D Krystal; Ruth M Benca; Martin Cohn; Christopher Lines; Thomas Roth; W Joseph Herring Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Christopher D Cox; Michael J Breslin; David B Whitman; John D Schreier; Georgia B McGaughey; Michael J Bogusky; Anthony J Roecker; Swati P Mercer; Rodney A Bednar; Wei Lemaire; Joseph G Bruno; Duane R Reiss; C Meacham Harrell; Kathy L Murphy; Susan L Garson; Scott M Doran; Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Wayne B Anderson; Cuyue Tang; Shane Roller; Tamara D Cabalu; Donghui Cui; George D Hartman; Steven D Young; Ken S Koblan; Christopher J Winrow; John J Renger; Paul J Coleman Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Christopher J Winrow; Anthony L Gotter; Christopher D Cox; Scott M Doran; Pamela L Tannenbaum; Michael J Breslin; Susan L Garson; Steven V Fox; Charles M Harrell; Joanne Stevens; Duane R Reiss; Donghui Cui; Paul J Coleman; John J Renger Journal: J Neurogenet Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 1.250
Authors: Hong Sun; William P Kennedy; Darren Wilbraham; Nicole Lewis; Nicole Calder; Xiaodong Li; Junshui Ma; Ka Lai Yee; Susan Ermlich; Eric Mangin; Christopher Lines; Laura Rosen; Jeffrey Chodakewitz; Gail M Murphy Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Y Zopf; C Rabe; A Neubert; K G Gassmann; W Rascher; E G Hahn; K Brune; H Dormann Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-07-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Amnon A Berger; Emily R Sottosanti; Ariel Winnick; Joseph Keefe; Elasaf Gilbert; Jamal Hasoon; Michael E Thase; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2022-02-25