| Literature DB >> 28265508 |
Zhen Hong Wang1, Hong Fang2, Mouhui Chen3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Rhizospheres, the most active interfaces between plants and soils, play a central role in the long-term maintenance of the biosphere. The anti-erodibility of soils (AES) regulated by the root exudates is crucial to the soil stability in the rhizospheres. However, scientists still debate (1) the key organic matter of the root exudates affecting the AES and (2) the interspecific variation of these root exudates.Entities:
Keywords: Aggregate status; Anti-erodibility of soils; Degree of aggregation; Dispersion ratio; Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer; Interspecific differences; Karst; Micro-aggregates; Rhizosphere; Root exudates; Soil erosion; Soil incubation; Water-stable aggregates; Woody plants
Year: 2017 PMID: 28265508 PMCID: PMC5335692 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Compositions of the water-stable aggregates of the soils samples incubated with the root exudates from the eight plant species.
| Tree species | Concentrations | The water-stable aggregates at different aggregate diameters (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >2 mm | 2-1 mm | 1–0.5 mm | 0.5–0.25 mm | <0.25 mm | ||
| Controls | 0 | 14.26 ± 1.07 | 16.95 ± 1.49 | 28.13 ± 1.07 | 7.10 ± 0.28 | 33.56 ± 0.86 |
| 1× | 18.18 ± 0.20 | 17.30 ± 0.30 | 25.87 ± 1.70 | 8.10 ± 0.78 | 30.56 ± 1.54 | |
| 2× | 14.94 ± 0.46 | 22.23 ± 0.91 | 29.09 ± 1.74 | 6.99 ± 0.85 | 26.76 ± 1.73 | |
| 3× | 17.41 ± 1.34 | 20.84 ± 0.83 | 27.17 ± 0.80 | 8.16 ± 0.42 | 26.42 ± 1.66 | |
| 1× | 14.93 ± 1.87 | 22.57 ± 2.08 | 26.67 ± 0.94 | 8.35 ± 0.50 | 27.48 ± 1.10 | |
| 2× | 20.53 ± 1.11 | 23.91 ± 1.61 | 23.66 ± 3.02 | 7.00 ± 0.92 | 24.91 ± 1.50 | |
| 3× | 18.81 ± 0.49 | 23.07 ± 1.34 | 24.97 ± 1.75 | 7.64 ± 0.44 | 25.50 ± 1.38 | |
| 1× | 14.12 ± 0.66 | 25.33 ± 1.36 | 25.05 ± 1.75 | 8.23 ± 1.37 | 27.28 ± 0.66 | |
| 2× | 15.82 ± 0.64 | 20.32 ± 2.35 | 28.27 ± 2.09 | 6.85 ± 0.79 | 28.76 ± 0.68 | |
| 3× | 15.90 ± 1.74 | 22.50 ± 2.63 | 28.15 ± 0.72 | 7.50 ± 0.15 | 25.95 ± 1.07 | |
| 1× | 17.89 ± 0.29 | 17.42 ± 2.14 | 28.43 ± 0.75 | 9.19 ± 0.79 | 27.06 ± 2.31 | |
| 2× | 17.17 ± 0.90 | 15.40 ± 1.27 | 29.88 ± 2.29 | 9.11 ± 0.38 | 28.45 ± 1.10 | |
| 3× | 16.42 ± 1.14 | 23.13 ± 1.06 | 26.34 ± 0.91 | 8.11 ± 1.07 | 26.00 ± 1.47 | |
| 1× | 16.68 ± 1.58 | 19.85 ± 1.26 | 27.79 ± 1.33 | 10.38 ± 0.96 | 25.30 ± 1.00 | |
| 2× | 14.05 ± 0.38 | 22.40 ± 0.71 | 27.85 ± 1.48 | 10.08 ± 1.27 | 25.62 ± 1.30 | |
| 3× | 18.28 ± 2.03 | 25.76 ± 1.50 | 24.48 ± 0.82 | 8.70 ± 0.96 | 22.77 ± 2.10 | |
| 1× | 13.99 ± 1.40 | 20.75 ± 2.40 | 30.24 ± 1.29 | 8.39 ± 0.49 | 26.63 ± 0.92 | |
| 2× | 13.97 ± 0.30 | 24.63 ± 0.61 | 27.79 ± 0.34 | 6.89 ± 0.32 | 26.72 ± 0.84 | |
| 3× | 14.78 ± 0.86 | 23.01 ± 1.13 | 26.81 ± 0.92 | 9.91 ± 0.48 | 25.48 ± 1.59 | |
| 1× | 19.11 ± 3.64 | 18.26 ± 1.96 | 27.87 ± 2.35 | 6.57 ± 0.16 | 28.19 ± 1.21 | |
| 2× | 19.41 ± 0.73 | 19.96 ± 1.82 | 28.25 ± 1.55 | 6.64 ± 1.03 | 25.75 ± 1.75 | |
| 3× | 19.95 ± 1.68 | 20.20 ± 1.84 | 28.70 ± 0.62 | 7.05 ± 0.52 | 24.10 ± 0.60 | |
| 1× | 16.87 ± 1.06 | 18.52 ± 0.64 | 27.41 ± 0.51 | 8.35 ± 0.81 | 28.85 ± 0.75 | |
| 2× | 13.38 ± 0.90 | 27.34 ± 2.42 | 28.29 ± 1.17 | 8.03 ± 0.81 | 22.95 ± 0.91 | |
| 3× | 14.45 ± 1.91 | 23.45 ± 2.53 | 29.21 ± 1.51 | 7.13 ± 0.70 | 25.76 ± 0.88 | |
| 1× | ||||||
| 2× | ||||||
| 3× | ||||||
| Coefficientsof variaiton ( | 11.74 | 13.99 | 5.83 | 12.66 | 5.68 | |
| 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.30 | ||
| 16.42 | 16.27 | 6.60 | 16.47 | 7.20 | ||
| 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.29 | ||
| 11.50 | 7.45 | 6.28 | 11.74 | 4.80 | ||
| 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.31 | ||
Notes.
1×, 2×and 3×represent the treatments incubated by 1, 2, and 3 times of the mother liquid of the root exudates. The same below.
Figure 2Mean weight diameter (MWD, A) and geometric mean diameter (GMD, B) of the soils incubated with the root exudates from the eight tree species.
C, Control sample; CP, C.pubescens; CPP, C.platycarpa; ZP, Z. planispinum Sieb.et Zucc.; LL, L.lucidum; IY, I.yunnanensis; CGL, C.glanduliferum; CG, C.gracilis; PL, P. longipes.
Microaggregate components of the soil samples incubated with the root exudates from the eight plant species.
| Tree species | Concentrations | The micro-aggregates at different aggregate diameters(%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2–0.25 mm | 0.25–0.05 mm | 0.05–0.02 mm | 0.02–0.002 mm | >0.002 mm | ||
| Controls | 0 | 71.87 ± 1.94 | 12.45 ± 0.84 | 5.72 ± 1.07 | 2.27 ± 0.52 | 7.69 ± 1.00 |
| 1× | 71.35 ± 2.09 | 12.29 ± 1.57 | 4.92 ± 0.48 | 4.44 ± 1.25 | 7.00 ± 0.60 | |
| 2× | 73.82 ± 1.23 | 12.62 ± 1.37 | 2.52 ± 0.79 | 4.60 ± 0.85 | 6.44 ± 1.08 | |
| 3× | 70.11 ± 1.65 | 13.69 ± 2.41 | 3.72 ± 0.44 | 6.08 ± 0.27 | 6.40 ± 1.03 | |
| 1× | 72.28 ± 2.17 | 13.92 ± 1.26 | 1.44 ± 0.53 | 5.52 ± 1.34 | 6.84 ± 0.47 | |
| 2× | 71.53 ± 0.88 | 13.11 ± 0.61 | 2.60 ± 0.08 | 6.12 ± 0.92 | 6.64 ± 0.75 | |
| 3× | 70.94 ± 2.22 | 10.98 ± 0.92 | 5.04 ± 1.32 | 7.24 ± 1.65 | 5.80 ± 1.04 | |
| 1× | 69.97 ± 2.71 | 13.99 ± 0.65 | 4.08 ± 0.65 | 5.16 ± 1.16 | 6.80 ± 1.43 | |
| 2× | 74.16 ± 2.25 | 12.04 ± 2.24 | 3.52 ± 1.61 | 4.88 ± 1.54 | 5.40 ± 0.74 | |
| 3× | 70.73 ± 2.53 | 12.55 ± 1.70 | 5.00 ± 0.64 | 5.56 ± 0.53 | 6.16 ± 1.03 | |
| 1× | 74.51 ± 4.12 | 11.01 ± 1.95 | 2.16 ± 0.36 | 6.48 ± 0.70 | 5.84 ± 1.32 | |
| 2× | 72.15 ± 2.16 | 13.13 ± 0.47 | 3.12 ± 0.42 | 5.44 ± 0.82 | 6.16 ± 0.82 | |
| 3× | 72.57 ± 0.91 | 11.51 ± 1.20 | 3.60 ± 0.79 | 6.60 ± 0.98 | 5.72 ± 0.96 | |
| 1× | 75.35 ± 2.63 | 10.37 ± 0.30 | 3.56 ± 0.76 | 4.22 ± 0.52 | 6.50 ± 1.25 | |
| 2× | 73.78 ± 3.13 | 12.54 ± 2.01 | 3.24 ± 0.26 | 4.36 ± 1.16 | 6.08 ± 1.31 | |
| 3× | 74.09 ± 0.91 | 11.07 ± 1.10 | 2.88 ± 0.73 | 5.76 ± 0.33 | 6.20 ± 1.46 | |
| 1× | 72.60 ± 1.93 | 10.61 ± 0.69 | 3.36 ± 0.30 | 6.64 ± 1.88 | 6.80 ± 0.55 | |
| 2× | 73.29 ± 1.47 | 14.35 ± 1.62 | 1.40 ± 0.23 | 3.68 ± 0.57 | 7.28 ± 0.58 | |
| 3× | 73.10 ± 2.72 | 12.78 ± 2.00 | 3.20 ± 0.23 | 4.64 ± 1.33 | 6.28 ± 0.90 | |
| 1× | 73.16 ± 3.34 | 12.20 ± 2.16 | 2.12 ± 1.18 | 5.08 ± 1.06 | 7.44 ± 1.02 | |
| 2× | 73.28 ± 1.79 | 10.40 ± 0.91 | 2.16 ± 1.11 | 7.40 ± 1.60 | 6.76 ± 1.32 | |
| 3× | 73.61 ± 1.09 | 11.31 ± 0.97 | 2.08 ± 0.52 | 6.52 ± 1.58 | 6.48 ± 0.28 | |
| 1× | 73.51 ± 2.44 | 11.69 ± 0.76 | 2.88 ± 0.47 | 4.20 ± 0.61 | 7.72 ± 2.14 | |
| 2× | 73.83 ± 4.25 | 10.37 ± 1.85 | 2.16 ± 0.72 | 6.32 ± 1.53 | 7.32 ± 0.50 | |
| 3× | 75.53 ± 3.16 | 11.11 ± 1.71 | 3.76 ± 0.58 | 4.40 ± 1.02 | 5.20 ± 0.86 | |
| 1× | ||||||
| 2× | ||||||
| 3× | ||||||
| 2.35 | 11.54 | 37.38 | 18.28 | 8.30 | ||
| 1.41 | 1.29 | N/A | 1.28 | 1.29 | ||
| 11.11 | 26.75 | 22.67 | 9.84 | |||
| 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.29 | |||
| 2.58 | 8.45 | 27.39 | 16.67 | 7.11 | ||
| 1.39 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.30 | ||
Notes.
N/A shows the value of CV great enough (CV > 30%) and it does not need to be tested with the CV.
Active biological matter concentration and relative organic matter content identified by GC-MS and their correlations with MWD and GMD.
| Tree species | Total solubl sugar (g/kg) | Total amino acids (g/kg) | Phenolic compound (g/kg) | Free amino acid (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.64 | 0.91 | 3.38 | 9.13 | |
| 1.24 | 1.04 | 3.49 | 14.24 | |
| 1.31 | 0.78 | 2.43 | 2.88 | |
| 1.11 | 0.24 | 3.39 | 12.38 | |
| 1.49 | 0.24 | 2.71 | 17.97 | |
| 1.51 | 0.36 | 2.76 | 12.1 | |
| 1.11 | 0.84 | 3.08 | 3.28 | |
| 0.8 | 2.32 | 10.65 | ||
| Pearson correlation coefficients | 0.41*; 0.48* | 0.50**; 0.55** | 0.52**; 0.48* | 0.39*; 0.44* |
| 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
Notes.
The values in the parenthesis are the number of the specific organic matter identified by GC-MS. N/A shows no identified due to the unsatisfactory flow diagrams. *,** or *** represents a significance at a 95%, 99% or 99.9% confidence level, respectively.
Comparison of the AES of the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of the additional plant species.
| Indices of the AES | Position | Average (%) | Standard deviation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggregation status | R | 51.17 | 42 | 14.47 | 3.014 | 0.0044 < 0.01 |
| B | 48.04 | 42 | 14.47 | |||
| Degree of aggregation | R | 70.61 | 42 | 15.84 | 1.484 | 0.1455 > 0.05 |
| B | 69.04 | 42 | 16.25 | |||
| Dispersion ratio | R | 36.29 | 42 | 13.25 | −3.343 | 0.0018 < 0.01 |
| B | 40.09 | 42 | 13.23 | |||
| Dispersion coefficient | R | 25.06 | 42 | 10.04 | −2.024 | 0.04957 < 0.05 |
| B | 28.12 | 42 | 12.95 |
Notes.
the rhizosphere soils
non-rhizosphere soils
Statistical quantities of the comprehensive AES indices, active biological matter contents, and relative concentrations of the organic matter identified by GC-MS in the rhizosphere soils of the additional plants.
| Indices of the AES | Aggregation status | Degree of aggregation | Dispersion ratio | Dispersion coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum (%) | 71.09 | 85.77 | 71.10 | 44.69 |
| Minimum (%) | 21.51 | 37.35 | 16.93 | 10.45 |
| Mean ( | 51.17 | 70.61 | 36.29 | 25.06 |
| Variance ( | 209.49 | 250.89 | 175.69 | 100.80 |
| Standard deviation ( | 14.47 | 15.84 | 13.25 | 10.04 |
| Coefficients of variation ( | 28.29 | 22.43 | 36.52 | 40.06 |
| 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.16 | |
| 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 |
Notes.
the number of plant species
Pearson coefficients for the correlations between the four comprehensive AES indices and the relative contents of organic matter identified by GC-MS and the active biological matter in the rhizosphere soils of the additional plant species.
| Types of organic matter | Aggregation status | Degree of aggregation | Dispersion ratio | Dispersion coefficient | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic matter identified by GC-MS | Hydrocarbon | <0.05 | 19 | 0.31 | >0.10 | 19 | <0.05 | 19 | −0.03 | >0.10 | 19 | ||
| Amides | −0.30 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.23 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.29 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.2 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Alcohols | −0.04 | >0.05 | 19 | −0.27 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.06 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.22 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Phenolic ether | −0.05 | >0.05 | 19 | 0.15 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.12 | >0.10 | 19 | < | |||
| Aldehyde | −0.13 | >0.05 | 19 | 0.05 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.16 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.11 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Acids | 0.22 | >0.05 | 19 | 0.08 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.23 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.01 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Ketone | −0.18 | >0.05 | 19 | −0.21 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.13 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.06 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Esters | 0.22 | >0.05 | 19 | 0.16 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.19 | >0.10 | 19 | 0.01 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Others | 0.25 | >0.05 | 19 | 0.24 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.23 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.2 | >0.10 | 19 | |
| Active biological matter | Total sugar | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | − | < | ||||
| Total amino acids | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | < | ||||||
| Phenolic compound | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | <0.001 | 42 | −0.32 | <0.05 | 42 | ||||
| Free amino acid | 0.13 | >0.10 | 42 | 0.14 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.07 | >0.10 | 19 | −0.18 | >0.10 | 19 | |
Notes.
The values in bold type represent significant relationships at a 90%, 95%, 99% or 99.9% confidence level respectively, when p < 0.10, 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001.
Figure 3Changes of the comprehensive AES indices with varying key organic matter contents.
(A) Hydrocarbon; (B) phenolic ether; (C) total sugar; (D) total amino acids; (E) phenolic compound; (F) free amino acid; triangular symbols: dispersion ratio; square symbols: degree of aggregation; diamonds: aggregation status; multiplication sign: dispersion coefficient. The regression models with R2 > 0.20 indicate the confidence level of 95% (p < 0.05) based on the goodness of fit test. The number of observations in all figures is the same as that in Table 6.