Literature DB >> 28265382

The barbed suture of deep fascia walks away and pierces through skin far from the incision - a case report.

Shufeng Li1, Huaqiang Sun1, Zhaolong Yu1, Wei Wang2, Teng Wang1, Xinfeng Yan1.   

Abstract

Barbed suture has been widely used in surgeries. However, this technique may raise many problems. Here, we report that the barbed suture of deep fascia walks away and pierces through skin far from the incision in a 61-year-old male 6 weeks after total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barbed suture; complication; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265382      PMCID: PMC5331252          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


Introduction

Barbed suture has been widely used in surgical incisions, especially in joint surgery and plastic surgery. This technique has its advantages, such as shortening operation time 1, 2, 3, 4, tightening the joint capsule more effectively 5, 6, 7, and decreasing scars 2, while the complication rate remains similar with conventional suturing methods 8, 9. However, barbed suture has generated new issues. It has been reported that skin suture may pierce through the incision 4, 10. Here, we encountered a case whose barbed suture of deep fascia ran away and pierced through the skin 20 cm away from the incision 6 weeks after the total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Case Report

The patient was a 61‐year‐old male and received left THA surgery due to osteonecrosis of femoral head. During the surgery, continuously suturing the fascia and fat layer was performed using one biodegradable No.2 two‐way barbed suture (36 + 36 cm), and continuously suturing the skin was performed with one biodegradable No.2‐0 two‐way barbed suture. The incision healed well without swelling. The patient was discharged 5 days after surgery. Six weeks after the surgery, skin ulceration was found in the anterolateral thigh, about 20 cm away from the incision (Fig. 1A and B), and the suture was seen piercing out from the ulceration. The patient did not feel pain or any other symptom during the barbed suture's walking. The patient pulled out the suture at home, which was found the No.2 biodegradable bidirectional barbed suture for deep fascia. It was about 10 cm long and broke into two parts during pulling out (Fig. 1C). The ulcer healed quickly after the suture was pulled out. The barber suture of the skin did not walk away. At present, it has been 9 months after the THA, and the patient's left hip functions well without infection, pain, or other symptoms. The study was approved by the review board of Qianfoshan Hospital, and written consent form was obtained from the patient.
Figure 1

(A and B) One week after barbed suture piecing and the position of barbed suture piercing. (C) The barbed suture of piercing.

(A and B) One week after barbed suture piecing and the position of barbed suture piercing. (C) The barbed suture of piercing.

Discussion

The emergence of barbed suture is a revolutionary progress for surgical incision. The use of barbed suture has become increasingly popular. However, its efficacy and safety continue to be debated. There are reports about skin suture piercing through the incision 4, 10. However, deep fascia sutures piercing through skin far away from the incision location have not been reported. Barbed suture uses biodegradable material. It is a type of knotless surgical suture that has barbs on its surface. While suturing tissue, these barbs penetrate inside the tissue and lock them into one direction, eliminating the need for knots to tie the suture. The directions of barbs along two ends of suture are opposite; therefore, under normal circumstances, the two ends restraint each other to avoid suture running 1. But when suture breaks in one point because of biodegradation absorption, one end of barbed suture will run in certain direction with the tissue movement. If the suture runs toward the nerves, blood vessels, and internal organs, it is possible there will be a corresponding damage. Or it can run toward and pierce through the skin, like the case we reported here. This case indicated potential risks that may exist in the application of the barbed sutures for deep tissue suturing. Design and manufacture of barbed sutures need to be improved in order to remove the risk and keep the advantages at the same time, such as remaining the main suture without breaking before the barbs are fully absorbed.

Authorship

SL, HS, ZY, TW, and XY: performed the operation. SL, WW, and XY: wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interests were declared by the authors.
  10 in total

1.  Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Vakil; Michael P O'Reilly; Edward G Sutter; Simon C Mears; Stephen M Belkoff; Harpal S Khanuja
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abigail L Campbell; David A Patrick; Barthelemy Liabaud; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A randomized 'N-of-1' single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively.

Authors:  S Koide; N R Smoll; J Liew; K Smith; A Rizzitelli; M W Findlay; D J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Barbed sutures for arthroplasty closure--does it decrease the risk of glove perforation?

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Scott Hadley; Justin M Weatherall; Steven C Gross; Scott E Marvin
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2012

6.  Barbed versus standard sutures for closure in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeremy M Gililland; Lucas A Anderson; Jacob K Barney; Hunter L Ross; Christopher E Pelt; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Barbed sutures in total knee arthroplasty: are these safe, efficacious, and cost-effective?

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Qais Naziri; Andy Wong; Ivan Burko; Michael A Mont; Vijay J Rasquinha
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Water-tight knee arthrotomy closure: comparison of a novel single bidirectional barbed self-retaining running suture versus conventional interrupted sutures.

Authors:  Michael Nett; Rui Avelar; Michael Sheehan; Fred Cushner
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Use of a barbed suture in the closure of hip and knee arthroplasty wounds.

Authors:  Brett R Levine; Nicholas Ting; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric L Smith; Steven T DiSegna; Pinak Y Shukla; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.