| Literature DB >> 28265160 |
Hee-Kyoung Kim1, Jung-Hyun Choi2.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of radiofrequency (RF), electroacupuncture (EA), and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), which are used in physical therapies, on facial wrinkles and moisture.Entities:
Keywords: Low-level laser therapy; Moisture; Wrinkles
Year: 2017 PMID: 28265160 PMCID: PMC5332991 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General characteristics
| Variables | LLLT | EA | RF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 42.9 ± 3.7 | 43.4 ± 7.1 | 42.8 ± 4.9 |
| Height (cm) | 159.8 ± 4.3 | 158.0 ± 4.3 | 163.0 ± 7.9 |
| Weight (kg) | 52.4 ± 6.1 | 58.8 ± 7.2 | 56.7 ± 7.5 |
Values are shown as the mean ± SD, p<0.05. LLLT: low-level laser therapy group; RF: radiofrequency group; EA: electroacupuncture group
Moisture rate
| Variables | Forehead | Cheek |
|---|---|---|
| Very dry (AU) | 1–24 | 1–24 |
| Dry (AU) | 25–34 | 25–34 |
| Moisturized (AU) | 35–44 | 35–44 |
| Sufficiently moisturized (AU) | 45–65 | 45–65 |
AU: Arbitrary unit
Changes in the number of wrinkles after RF, EA or LLLT and a comparison of wrinkle improvements between groups
| Wrinkles | Intervention | Pre | Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under eyes | aRight | RF* | 11.2 ± 2.8 | 8.3 ± 3.6 |
| EA* | 14.7 ± 9.5 | 10.7 ± 7.3 | ||
| LLLT* | 14.4 ± 6.2 | 11.3 ± 4.4 | ||
| bLeft | RF* | 12.9 ± 4.5 | 8.0 ± 3.3 | |
| EA* | 16.5 ± 8.9 | 13.0 ± 7.3 | ||
| LLLT* | 12.7 ± 5.8 | 10.1 ± 4.6 | ||
| Eye rims | aRight | RF* | 8.1 ± 4.1 | 6.0 ± 3.1 |
| EA* | 12.3 ± 8.1 | 9.8 ± 5.9 | ||
| LLLT* | 7.6 ± 3.7 | 6.6 ± 2.9 | ||
| bLeft | RF | 7.9 ± 5.2 | 6.8 ± 4.3 | |
| EA | 13.0 ± 8.2 | 11.2 ± 6.7 | ||
| LLLT | 7.7 ± 4.0 | 6.6 ± 3.8 | ||
Values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, *Significant difference between the pre- and post-tests within each group, p<0.05. aPaired Samples T-test; bWilcoxon Rank-Sum test; RF: radiofrequency; EA: electroacupuncture; LLLT: low-level laser therapy
Changes in skin moisture after RF, EA or LLLT and comparison of skin moisture improvements between groups
| Moisture content | Intervention | Pre | Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| aForehead | RF* | 35.3 ± 2.5 | 37.1 ± 3.0 |
| EA* | 33.7 ± 3.8 | 38.7 ± 3.2 | |
| LLLT | 32.9 ± 4.8 | 36.9 ± 4.9 | |
| aCheek2<1 | RF* | 36.3 ± 2.9 | 38.9 ± 2.5 |
| EA* | 33.7 ± 3.6 | 41.5 ± 3.5 | |
| LLLT* | 34.5 ± 2.9 | 39.9 ± 3.3 |
Values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, *Significant difference between the pre- and post-tests within each group, p<0.05. aPaired Samples T-test; bWilcoxon Rank-Sum test; LLLT: low-level laser therapy; EA: electroacupuncture; RF: radiofrequency; 1: RF; 2: EA; 3: LLLT