Literature DB >> 28265092

Consequences of a price incentive on free riding and electric energy consumption.

Mikael Elinder1,2,3, Sebastian Escobar4,2, Ingel Petré4.   

Abstract

This article shows that a simple monetary incentive can dramatically reduce electric energy consumption (EEC) in the residential sector and simultaneously achieve a more desirable allocation of EEC costs. The analyses are based on data from a policy experiment conducted in 2011 and 2012 by a private housing company in about 1,800 apartments. Roughly 800 of the tenants (treatment group) were subject to a change from having unlimited EEC included in their rent to having to pay the market price for their own EEC. This change was achieved by installing EEC meters in each apartment. Tenants in the other 1,000 apartments (control group) experienced no policy change and were subject to apartment-level billing and metering during the entire study period. Using a quasiexperimental research design and daily data on EEC from 2007 to 2015, we estimate that apartment-level billing and metering permanently reduce EEC by about 25%. Moreover, we show that households reduce EEC immediately after being informed that they will be billed for EEC, the reduction is larger when the production cost is higher, and the reduction in EEC comes almost exclusively from households with very high EEC before the policy change. Finally, we show that apartment-level billing and metering are cost-effective, with a cost per reduced kilowatt hour of US$0.01, and for each invested dollar, the social value of reductions in air pollution, including CO2 emissions, is $2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy conservation; environment; quasiexperiment; smart meters; sub metering

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265092      PMCID: PMC5373411          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615290114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  The struggle to govern the commons.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz; Elinor Ostrom; Paul C Stern
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nonprice incentives and energy conservation.

Authors:  Omar I Asensio; Magali A Delmas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.

Authors:  G Hardin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phu Nguyen-Van; Anne Stenger; Tuyen Tiet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.