| Literature DB >> 28264952 |
Anna D Sinaiko1, Mary Beth Landrum2, David J Meyers3, Shehnaz Alidina4, Daniel D Maeng5, Mark W Friedberg6, Lisa M Kern7, Alison M Edwards8, Signe Peterson Flieger9, Patricia R Houck10, Pamela Peele11, Robert J Reid12, Katharine McGraves-Lloyd13, Karl Finison14, Meredith B Rosenthal15.
Abstract
The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model emphasizes comprehensive, coordinated, patient-centered care, with the goals of reducing spending and improving quality. To evaluate the impact of PCMH initiatives on utilization, cost, and quality, we conducted a meta-analysis of methodologically standardized findings from evaluations of eleven major PCMH initiatives. There was significant heterogeneity across individual evaluations in many outcomes. Across evaluations, PCMH initiatives were not associated with changes in the majority of outcomes studied, including primary care, emergency department, and inpatient visits and four quality measures. The initiatives were associated with a 1.5 percent reduction in the use of specialty visits and a 1.2 percent increase in cervical cancer screening among all patients, and a 4.2 percent reduction in total spending (excluding pharmacy spending) and a 1.4 percent increase in breast cancer screening among higher-morbidity patients. These associations were significant. Identification of the components of PCMHs likely to improve outcomes is critical to decisions about investing resources in primary care. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Cost of Health Care; Primary Care; Quality Of Care
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28264952 PMCID: PMC5555150 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301