| Literature DB >> 28264196 |
Nicholas W Bellono1, Duncan B Leitch1, David Julius1.
Abstract
Elasmobranch fishes, including sharks, rays, and skates, use specialized electrosensory organs called ampullae of Lorenzini to detect extremely small changes in environmental electric fields. Electrosensory cells within these ampullae can discriminate and respond to minute changes in environmental voltage gradients through an unknown mechanism. Here we show that the voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.3 and the big conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel are preferentially expressed by electrosensory cells in little skate (Leucoraja erinacea) and functionally couple to mediate electrosensory cell membrane voltage oscillations, which are important for the detection of specific, weak electrical signals. Both channels exhibit unique properties compared with their mammalian orthologues that support electrosensory functions: structural adaptations in CaV1.3 mediate a low-voltage threshold for activation, and alterations in BK support specifically tuned voltage oscillations. These findings reveal a molecular basis of electroreception and demonstrate how discrete evolutionary changes in ion channel structure facilitate sensory adaptation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28264196 PMCID: PMC5354974 DOI: 10.1038/nature21401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962
Extended Data Figure 10Behavioral paradigm for pharmacologically-treated skates and startle response-related control
a. Schematic drawing of electrical stimulus. A 9V battery was used to generate a dipole DC stimulus through two independent leads placed into Tygon rubber tubing filled with seawater (left). The ends of these tubes were threaded through an acrylic plate to 4 different equally spaced locations on the base of the behavioral observation tank which were then obscured by sand (right).
b. Following 30 minutes of free exploration, control and pharmacologically-treated skates were gently tapped upon the pectoral fin. The average distance moved during the startle response is represented as mean ± sem; n=10. Differences were not significant according to a two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test.
c. Schematic drawing traced from typical example of skate startle response following pectoral fin stimulation (red arrow). The distance covered during the startle response was measured from the initial location (left) to the final location where the body axis became straight again (right), and the distance from the center between the eyes from each respective position was recorded (dotted yellow line).