| Literature DB >> 28264053 |
Gennadiy Gurariy, Kyle W Killebrew, Marian E Berryhill, Gideon P Caplovitz.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167022.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28264053 PMCID: PMC5338830 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 3Index values and T-stats depicting set size effects (2 vs. 4) at encoding.
(A) Index values (described in Materials and methods section: Frequency-tagging (evoked) analysis) plotted on topographic maps. Green corresponds to set size 4 > set size 2, purple corresponds to set size 2 > set size 4. (B) t-stats plotted on topographic maps. Plotted values correspond to t-stats at or below a p value of 0.05. Red corresponds to set size 4 > set size 2, blue corresponds to set size 2 > set size 4. (C) t-stats at each electrode arranged by p values. Green dotted line represents a threshold of α = 0.05. Red line represents an FDR corrected threshold for q = 0.1 (see results section: Analysis of frequency tagging amplitude and set size effects). Channels significant at or above the FDR threshold are represented by a thicker border.
Fig 4Index values and T-stats depicting induced power set size effects (2 vs. 4) at encoding.
(A) Index values (described Materials and methods section: Induced power frequency analysis) plotted on topographic maps. Green corresponds to set size 4 > set size 2, purple corresponds to set size 2 > set size 4. (B) t-stats plotted on topographic maps. Plotted values correspond t-stats at or below a p value of 0.05. Red corresponds to set size 4 > set size 2, blue corresponds to set size 2 > set size 4. (C) t-stats at each electrode arranged by p values. Green dotted line represents a threshold of α = 0.05. Channels significant at or above the FDR threshold are represented by a thicker border. Each row depicts data from a single frequency band: delta (top), theta, alpha, beta, gamma (bottom).