OBJECTIVE: To synthesize findings from the published literature on the use of technology in the NICU to improve communications and interactions among health care providers, parents, and infants. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for related research published through May 2016. The reference lists of all studies were reviewed, and a hand search of key journals was also conducted to locate eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Eleven studies (five quantitative, two qualitative, and four mixed methods) were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Only studies published in English were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Whittemore and Knafl's methodology for conducting integrative reviews was used to guide data extraction, analysis, and synthesis. Data were extracted and organized according to the following headings: author, year, and location; study purpose and design; sample size and demographics; technology used; study findings; and limitations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Various technologies were used, including videoconferencing, videophone, and commercially available modalities such as Skype, FaceTime, AngelEye, and NICView Webcams. In the 11 studies, three main outcomes were evaluated: parents' perception of technology use, health care providers' perceptions of technology use, and objective outcomes, such as parental anxiety or stress or infant length of stay. Overall, parents and health care providers perceived the varied interventions quite favorably, although a few significant differences were found for the objective measures. CONCLUSION: Several interventions have been tested to improve communications and promote interactions among NICU health care team members, parents, and infants. Although initial findings are positive, research in this area is quite limited, and the reviewed studies had several limitations. There is a significant need for further rigorous research to be conducted with diverse samples.
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize findings from the published literature on the use of technology in the NICU to improve communications and interactions among health care providers, parents, and infants. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for related research published through May 2016. The reference lists of all studies were reviewed, and a hand search of key journals was also conducted to locate eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Eleven studies (five quantitative, two qualitative, and four mixed methods) were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Only studies published in English were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Whittemore and Knafl's methodology for conducting integrative reviews was used to guide data extraction, analysis, and synthesis. Data were extracted and organized according to the following headings: author, year, and location; study purpose and design; sample size and demographics; technology used; study findings; and limitations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Various technologies were used, including videoconferencing, videophone, and commercially available modalities such as Skype, FaceTime, AngelEye, and NICView Webcams. In the 11 studies, three main outcomes were evaluated: parents' perception of technology use, health care providers' perceptions of technology use, and objective outcomes, such as parental anxiety or stress or infant length of stay. Overall, parents and health care providers perceived the varied interventions quite favorably, although a few significant differences were found for the objective measures. CONCLUSION: Several interventions have been tested to improve communications and promote interactions among NICU health care team members, parents, and infants. Although initial findings are positive, research in this area is quite limited, and the reviewed studies had several limitations. There is a significant need for further rigorous research to be conducted with diverse samples.
Authors: A S Carter; F E Garrity-Rokous; R Chazan-Cohen; C Little; M J Briggs-Gowan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: O Globus; L Leibovitch; A Maayan-Metzger; I Schushan-Eisen; I Morag; R Mazkereth; S Glasser; G Kaplan; T Strauss Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Ana Gutiérrez-Vélez; Gonzalo Solís-García; Elena Zamora-Flores; Manuel Sánchez-Luna Journal: An Pediatr (Barc) Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.377
Authors: Sara E Shaw; Deborah Cameron; Joseph Wherton; Lucas M Seuren; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Satyajit Bhattacharya; Christine A'Court; Joanne Morris; Trisha Greenhalgh Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-07-31
Authors: Loredana Cena; Paolo Biban; Jessica Janos; Manuela Lavelli; Joshua Langfus; Angelina Tsai; Eric A Youngstrom; Alberto Stefana Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-02-24