Literature DB >> 28263208

A taxonomy of hospitals participating in Medicare accountable care organizations.

Gloria J Bazzoli1, David W Harless, Askar S Chukmaitov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicare was an early innovator of accountable care organizations (ACOs), establishing the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and Pioneer programs in 2012-2013. Existing research has documented that ACOs bring together an array of health providers with hospitals serving as important participants.
PURPOSE: Hospitals vary markedly in their service structure and organizational capabilities, and thus, one would expect hospital ACO participants to vary in these regards. Our research identifies hospital subgroups that share certain capabilities and competencies. Such research, in conjunction with existing ACO research, provides deeper understanding of the structure and operation of these organizations. Given that Medicare was an initiator of the ACO concept, our findings provide a baseline to track the evolution of ACO hospitals over time. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Hierarchical clustering methods are used in separate analyses of MSSP and Pioneer ACO hospitals. Hospitals participating in ACOs with 2012-2013 start dates are identified through multiple sources. Study data come from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, American Hospital Association, and Health Information and Management Systems Society.
RESULTS: Five-cluster solutions were developed separately for the MSSP and Pioneer hospital samples. Both the MSSP and Pioneer taxonomies had several clusters with high levels of health information technology capabilities. Also distinct clusters with strong physician linkages were present. We examined Pioneer ACO hospitals that subsequently left the program and found that they commonly had low levels of ambulatory care services or health information technology.
CONCLUSION: Distinct subgroups of hospitals exist in both the MSSP and Pioneer programs, suggesting that individual hospitals serve different roles within an ACO. Health information technology and physician linkages appear to be particularly important features in ACO hospitals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: ACOs need to consider not only geographic and service mix when selecting hospital participants but also their vertical integration features and management competencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 28263208      PMCID: PMC5582014          DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  13 in total

1.  A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos.

Authors:  G J Bazzoli; S M Shortell; N Dubbs; C Chan; P Kralovec
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Assessing the extent of integration achieved through physician-hospital arrangements.

Authors:  L Dynan; G J Bazzoli; R Burns
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  1998 May-Jun

3.  Implementing qualifications criteria and technical assistance for accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An empirical taxonomy of hospital governing board roles.

Authors:  Shoou-Yih D Lee; Jeffrey A Alexander; Virginia Wang; Frances S Margolin; John R Combes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Delivery system characteristics and their association with quality and costs of care: implications for accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Askar Chukmaitov; David W Harless; Gloria J Bazzoli; Henry J Carretta; Umaporn Siangphoe
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Applying Organization Theory to Understanding the Adoption and Implementation of Accountable Care Organizations: Commentary.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Accountable Care Organizations and Transaction Cost Economics.

Authors:  Stephen S Farnsworth Mick; Patrick D Shay
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  A taxonomic analysis of multihospital systems.

Authors:  B L Lewis; J Alexander
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Corporate and philanthropic models of hospital governance: a taxonomic evaluation.

Authors:  B J Weiner; J A Alexander
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa; T S Raghu; Benjamin B M Shao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  5 in total

1.  Accountable Care Organizations and Preventable Hospitalizations Among Patients With Depression.

Authors:  Deanna Barath; Aitalohi Amaize; Jie Chen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Hospital-based health systems 20 years later: A taxonomy for policy research and analysis.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Daniel J Gottlieb; Pablo Martinez Camblor; A James O'Malley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  Treatment Patterns in Veterans with Laryngeal and Oropharyngeal Cancer and Impact on Survival.

Authors:  Peter A Richardson; Sagar Kansara; George G Chen; Anita Sabichi; Andrew G Sikora; Robert B Parke; Donald T Donovan; Elizabeth Chiao; Vlad C Sandulache
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-09

Review 4.  Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Casey P Balio; Nate C Apathy; Robin L Danek
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-07-08

5.  The Association between Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration and Outpatient Physician Prices Paid by Commercial Insurers: New Evidence.

Authors:  James Godwin; Daniel R Arnold; Brent D Fulton; Richard M Scheffler
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.