Literature DB >> 28263134

Standing cough test for evaluation of post-prostatectomy incontinence: a pilot study.

Allen F Morey1, Nirmish Singla, Maude Carmel, Alexandra Klein, Timothy J Tausch, Jordan Siegel, Isamu Tachibana, Jeremy Scott.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We implemented a standardized Standing Cough Test (SCT) for assessment of men with post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) and stratified results according to an objective clinical grading scale in an attempt to facilitate male anti-incontinence surgical procedure selection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SCT was routinely performed during the initial outpatient consultation for PPI. Incontinence severity was recorded based on a novel Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale (MSIGS) to stratify PPI. Each patient was assigned an incontinence grade score of 0 through 4 during the SCT. Men with mild stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (grades 0-2) were offered sling surgery while those with heavier SUI (grades 3-4) were offered artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). MSIGS grade was correlated to preoperative patient-reported pads per day (PPD), and patient-reported outcomes of anti-incontinence surgery were assessed.
RESULTS: Among 62 consecutive PPI patients, 20 (32%) were graded as mild based on SCT, while the majority (42/62, 68%) were graded as moderate-severe. Average time from prostatectomy to treatment was 6 years. MSIGS grade demonstrated a strong correlation with preoperative PPD (r = 0.74). Among the 53 patients who underwent surgery for PPI, 14 with mild SUI received a sling, while 39 (74%) more severe cases received an AUS. Patient-reported improvement was high overall in both groups (median 95%).
CONCLUSION: Most men with chronic PPI present for definitive treatment in a delayed manner after prostatectomy despite having severe incontinence. The SCT provides immediate, objective information about the severity of PPI which strongly correlates with patient-reported pads-per-day and may expedite anti-incontinence surgical procedure selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  2 in total

1.  Selecting the best candidate for a male incontinence device or another: dream or nightmare?

Authors:  Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Standing cough test stratification of moderate male stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Yooni A Yi; Nicolas M Ortiz; Adam S Baumgarten; Ellen E Ward; Maia E VanDyke; Steven J Hudak; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.