| Literature DB >> 28262831 |
C Gil-Lozano1, A F Davila2, E Losa-Adams1,3, A G Fairén1,4, L Gago-Duport3.
Abstract
Oxidation of pyrite (Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28262831 PMCID: PMC5337962 DOI: 10.1038/srep43703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1H2O2 evolution induced by pyrite slurries in unbuffered water.
Inset: particle loading (g/L) (a) oxic conditions, (b) anoxic conditions.
Figure 2Simultaneous trends of O2 and H2O2 obtained from pyrite slurries in unbuffered water.
The bottom figure shows the first two hours of the reaction, under (a) oxic (particle loading = 1.75 g/l) and (b) anoxic conditions (particle loading = 1.09 g/L).
Figure 3Spectroscopic monitoring of Fe3+and OH from pyrite slurries under anoxic conditions.
(a) Absorption bands detected from aqueous pyrite suspension in anoxic conditions and in the dark showing Fe3+-complexes signatures (particle loading = 0.28 g/L). The numbers inserted over the absorption bands show the reaction time. Spectra were registered in real time using a liquid waveguide capillary flow cell (LWCC; path length: 250 cm; WPI), connected to the batch reactor by a peristaltic pump; (b) Degradation of CV solution upon pyrite aqueous reaction under anoxic conditions and in the dark (particle loading = 0.12 g/L, [CV]0 = 225.5 μM).
Figure 4Recurrence of H2O2 formation by pyrite slurry after H2O renewal.
(a) H2O2 evolution from the same pyrite slurry after renewing H2O twice, in oxic-open conditions (pyrite load particle = 0.33 g/L, ΔpH1cycle = 6.8–3.8, ΔpH2cycle = 6.8–6.1, ΔpH3cycle = 6.8–6.7); (b) Initial observed rate of H2O2 formation assuming a zero kinetic order rate.
Figure 5Identification of iron oxide patches in pyrite surface by HTREM.
(a) HTREM image showing the formation of secondary products over a lamella of pyrite after 22 hours immersed in a micromolar solution of H2O2 under anoxic conditions; (b) FFT of ferrihydrite patches; (c) FFT of the crystalline part showing spacing characteristic of pyrite and goethite.
Rate constants obtained by fitting experimental data.
| Rate constants | Oxic conditions | Anoxic conditions |
|---|---|---|
| 10−3.58 | 10−3.70 | |
| 10−8.25 | 10−8.14 | |
| by O2 10−7.86 (mol/ m2 s) | by H2O2 10−6.03 (L/ m2 s) |
*The rate of pyrite oxidation by H2O2 was used as an additional adjustable parameter based on the expression given by McKibben and Barnes (1987) whereas the oxidation rate by O2 was used as a fixed parameter (Liu et al. 2008).
Figure 6Experimental and fitting curves of H2O2 evolution, together with model-derived trends of pyrite dissolution products and secondary ROS.
(a) experimental and model curves of H2O2 together with Fe2+/ Fe3+, SO42−, pH and O2 model trends, under oxic conditions (pyrite particle loading = 0.71 g/L, A/V0 = 1 m2/L, pH0 = 7, [O2]0 = 232 μM); and, (b) anoxic conditions (pyrite particle loading = 2.16 g/L, A/V0 = 3.16 m2/L, pH0 = 7, [O2]0 = 0 μM). Time evolution of ROS obtained with the previous models under: (c) oxic conditions; and (d) anoxic conditions. *The evolution of O2 was omitted from the plot because model calculations gave negligible concentrations.
Figure 7Influence of pyrite reactive surface area on H2O2 evolution.
(a) 3D plot showing the H2O2 and Fe2+simulated trends at different values of the surface area of pyrite per volume of H2O (A0/V from 1 to 2.5, m2/L). (b) Summation of ROS generated by the Fenton reaction for the lowest and the highest values of the reactive surface (Initial conditions: koxic = 2.33 × 10−4, kanoxic = 6.46 × 10−9 mol/m2s –average values of the rate constants estimated by the model-, pyrite particle loading = 1 g/L, pH0 = 7, [O2]0 = 0 μM).