| Literature DB >> 28262675 |
Marcus Lefebure1,2, Richard W Tothill1,2,3, Elizabeth Kruse1, Edwin D Hawkins4, Jake Shortt1,5, Geoffrey M Matthews6, Gareth P Gregory1, Benjamin P Martin1, Madison J Kelly1, Izabela Todorovski1, Maria A Doyle1, Richard Lupat1, Jason Li1, Jan Schroeder4, Meaghan Wall7,8, Stuart Craig1, Gretchen Poortinga1, Don Cameron1, Megan Bywater1, Lev Kats1,2, Micah D Gearhart9, Vivian J Bardwell9, Ross A Dickins10, Ross D Hannan1,11, Anthony T Papenfuss1,2,4, Ricky W Johnstone1,2.
Abstract
The Eμ-Myc mouse is an extensively used model of MYC driven malignancy; however to date there has only been partial characterization of MYC co-operative mutations leading to spontaneous lymphomagenesis. Here we sequence spontaneously arising Eμ-Myc lymphomas to define transgene architecture, somatic mutations, and structural alterations. We identify frequent disruptive mutations in the PRC1-like component and BCL6-corepressor gene Bcor. Moreover, we find unexpected concomitant multigenic lesions involving Cdkn2a loss and other cancer genes including Nras, Kras and Bcor. These findings challenge the assumed two-hit model of Eμ-Myc lymphoma and demonstrate a functional in vivo role for Bcor in suppressing tumorigenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28262675 PMCID: PMC5343491 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Transgene architecture in Eμ-Myc lymphoma.
(a) Circos plot showing the Eμ-Myc transgenic cassette (pUC12, phiX, chr12 (Eμ), chr15 (Myc), identified breakpoints and estimated copy number. Outer coloured bars depict chromosome and transgene segments. Grey bars and links represent germline copies with two copies per increment. Red bars represent additional somatic copy-number gain and breakpoints. (b) Schematic showing the arrangement of the Eμ-Myc transgene (upper), the three repeats (TG1-3) of the transgene in the Eμ-Myc germline (middle) and the extra gain of the transgene and the segment of chr19 in lymphoma #88 (lower). This figure was adapted from Adams et al. (ref. 7). R in red band indicates repetitive DNA elements.
Figure 2Somatic mutations detected by exome-sequencing of Eμ-Myc lymphomas.
(a) Mutation frequency across 23 Eμ-Myc lymphomas from a prospective (n=16) and retrospective series (n=7). (b) Mutations identified in known cancer genes in Eμ-Myc lymphomas.
Figure 3Variant allele frequency determined by targeted amplicon sequencing.
Targeted amplicon sequencing (TAM-seq) was performed on the prospective Eμ-Myc tumour cohort to validate mutations from WES screen. Variant allele frequency is shown on the left y-axis for the mutations that were validated, with genes present in the cancer gene census list highlighted. The right y-axis displays relative copy number of Cdkn2a in the samples where gene deletion is suspected based on WES read depth and qPCR analysis.
Figure 4Experimental validation of BCOR tumour-suppressor function using RNAi and CRISPR-Cas9.
(a) Schematic showing exon structure of Bcor with position of identified spontaneous mutations and deletions and regions targeted using shRNA (pLMS-Bcor.sh9) or CRISPR-Cas9 (pCIG-Bcor) guide RNA in exome 4. (b) Kaplan–Meier curve showing mice injected with 106 GFP+ve Eμ-Myc fetal liver cells (FLC) endowed with either pLMS.sh.Bcorsh9 (solid line), pLMS.shTrp531224 (heavy dashed line) or pLMS.sh.Scram (light dashed line). Mice transplanted with Eμ-Myc FLC endowed with pLMS.sh.Bcorsh9 (80 day median survival time post-transplant) or pLMS.shTrp531224 (45 day median survival time post-transplant) showed significantly accelerated lymphomagenesis compared with the cohort that received FLC transduced with pLMS.sh.Scram (151 day median survival time post-transplant). *=P value<0.05log-rank (mantel-cox) test, n=13 for each cohort. (c) Kaplan–Meier curve showing mice transplanted with 106 Eμ-Myc FLC endowed with either CRISPR-BcorG2 (solid line), CRISPR-Trp53 (heavy dashed line) or CRISPR-Scram (lightly dashed line). Mice transplanted with Eμ-Myc FLC endowed with CRISPR-BcorG2 (70 day median survival time post-transplant) or CRISPR-Trp53 (34 day median survival time post-transplant) showed significantly accelerated lymphomagenesis compared with the cohort that received FLC transduced with CRISPR-Scram. *=P value<0.05log-rank (mantel-cox test), n=6 for each cohort. (d) Immunoblot showing levels of BCOR knockdown in six tumours obtained from mouse recipients of Eμ-Myc pLMS.shBcor.sh9, #4242 (Bcor mutant) and #6066 (Bcor wild type). Whole cell lysates were prepared from Eμ-Myc-Bcor.sh9 fetal liver-derived tumours, a Bcor mutant Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell line (#4242) and a Bcor WT Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell line (6066). Western blot analysis was performed with antibodies specific to BCOR. Reduced BCOR protein expression was demonstrated in the Eμ-Myc pLMS.shBcor.sh9 lysates compared with WT. Equivalent protein loading was confirmed by probing for β-Actin. (e) Whole cell lysates were prepared from Eμ-Myc-pCIG-BcorG2 fetal liver-derived tumours, a Bcor mutant Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell line (4242) and a Bcor WT Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell line (6066). Western blot analysis was performed as in d above. No BCOR protein expression was apparent in the Eμ-Myc-pCIG-BcorG2 lysates compared with WT.
Figure 5Bcor re-expression in a Bcor null Eμ-Myc cell line.
(a) 4242 cells (Bcor null) were transduced with either MSCV inert vector or MSCV;Bcorwt and FACS sorted into a ratio of 50:50 with the non-transduced parental cell line. The GFP population was monitored over time and demonstrated that forced Bcor expression in 4,242 cells is a competitive disadvantage. (b) Western blot analysis showing BCOR re-expression in the 4,242 cell line that was transduced with MSCV;Bcorwt compared with the cells transduced with the inert vector and the parental cell line. (c) Human B-cell line, Namalwa (Bcor-low) were transduced with either MSCV inert vector or MSCV;Bcorwt and FACS sorted into a ratio of 50:50 with the non-transduced parental cell line. (d) Western blot analysis showing BCOR re-expression in the Namalwa cell line that was transduced with MSCV;Bcorwt compared with the cells transduced with the inert vector.
Figure 6Gene-expression profiling of Eμ-Myc lymphomas identified a reproducible signature of Bcor mutation or knockdown.
RNA-seq analysis was first used to identify 393 significantly differentially expressed genes (FDR-corrected<0.05 and log2 fold-change≥2) between pLMS.sh.Bcor and combined pLMS.sh.Bcorsh9 and overexpressing NrasQ61K fetal liver-derived Eμ-Myc lymphomas. RNA-seq data for shRNA fetal liver-derived lymphomas plus CRISPR-Cas9 (CrispR.BcorT2) and sporadic Eμ-Myc lymphomas was then clustered using the 393 gene set. All CrispR.BcorT2 and sporadic Bcor mutant lymphomas (red arrows) cluster with the pLMS.sh.Bcorsh9 fetal liver-derived lymphomas. The sporadic NrasQ61K mutant cell line #6066 (blue arrow) also clustered correctly with NrasQ61K overexpressing fetal liver-derived lymphomas. Heatmap and scale bar represents median normalized log2-fold gene-expression.