Literature DB >> 28262279

Major influence of interobserver reliability on polytrauma identification with the Injury Severity Score (ISS): Time for a centralised coding in trauma registries?

Roman Maduz1, Patrick Kugelmeier1, Severin Meili1, Robert Döring1, Christoph Meier2, Peter Wahl1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) find increasingly widespread use to assess trauma burden and to perform interhospital benchmarking through trauma registries. Since 2015, public resource allocation in Switzerland shall even be derived from such data. As every trauma centre is responsible for its own coding and data input, this study aims at evaluating interobserver reliability of AIS and ISS coding.
METHODS: Interobserver reliability of the AIS and ISS is analysed from a cohort of 50 consecutive severely injured patients treated in 2012 at our institution, coded retrospectively by 3 independent and specifically trained observers.
RESULTS: Considering a cutoff ISS≥16, only 38/50 patients (76%) were uniformly identified as polytraumatised or not. Increasing the cut off to ≥20, this increased to 41/50 patients (82%). A difference in the AIS of ≥ 1 was present in 261 (16%) of possible codes. Excluding the vast majority of uninjured body regions, uniformly identical AIS severity values were attributed in 67/193 (35%) body regions, or 318/579 (55%) possible observer pairings.
CONCLUSION: Injury severity all too often is neither identified correctly nor consistently when using the AIS. This leads to wrong identification of severely injured patients using the ISS. Improving consistency of coding through centralisation is recommended before scores based on the AIS are to be used for interhospital benchmarking and resource allocation in the treatment of severely injured patients.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AIS; Abbreviated injury scale; ISS; Injury severity score; Interobserver reliability; Polytrauma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28262279     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Are Pre-hospital Trauma Deaths Preventable? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Roman Pfeifer; Sascha Halvachizadeh; Sylvia Schick; Kai Sprengel; Kai Oliver Jensen; Michel Teuben; Ladislav Mica; Valentin Neuhaus; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Inter-rater reliability of the Abbreviated Injury Scale scores in patients with severe head injury shows good inter-rater agreement but variability between countries. An inter-country comparison study.

Authors:  Amy C Gunning; Menco J S Niemeyer; Mark van Heijl; Karlijn J P van Wessem; Ronald V Maier; Zsolt J Balogh; Luke P H Leenen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Interobserver variability of injury severity assessment in polytrauma patients: does the anatomical region play a role?

Authors:  Eftychios Bolierakis; Sylvia Schick; Kai Sprengel; Kai Oliver Jensen; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape; Roman Pfeifer
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  The impact of regionalized trauma care on the distribution of severely injured patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Suzan Dijkink; Erik W van Zwet; Pieta Krijnen; Luke P H Leenen; Frank W Bloemers; Michael J R Edwards; Dennis Den Hartog; Peter A Leenhouts; Martijn Poeze; W Richard Spanjersberg; Klaus W Wendt; Ralph J De Wit; Stefan W A M Van Zuthpen; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Comparison of Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Revised Trauma Score in Predicting the Mortality and Prolonged ICU Stay of Traumatic Young Children: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yii-Ting Huang; Ying-Hsien Huang; Ching-Hua Hsieh; Chao-Jui Li; I-Min Chiu
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 1.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.