Literature DB >> 28262219

Does Urgent Colonoscopy Improve Outcomes in the Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

Ankur Seth1, Muhammad Ali Khan2, Richard Nollan3, Deepansh Gupta1, Sehrish Kamal1, Utkarsh Singh1, Faisal Kamal1, Colin W Howden4.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy continues to be an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Studies that have evaluated the role of urgent colonoscopy for treating LGIB have reached conflicting conclusions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of urgent colonoscopy in several outcomes in patients with LGIB. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases from inception to July 10, 2016 for comparative studies evaluating the role of urgent versus elective colonoscopy in the management of LGIB. We evaluated mortality, rate of rebleeding, length of stay in hospital, identification of bleeding source, stigmata of recent hemorrhage and need for surgery. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables whereas standard mean differences were calculated for continuous variables. We assessed quality using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. We used the GRADE framework to interpret our findings. A total of 6 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies) with 23,419 patients (9,498 urgent colonoscopy and 13,921 elective colonoscopy) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled ORs with 95% CI for mortality, rebleeding and identification of bleeding source were 0.84 (0.46-1.53), 1.18 (0.64-2.16) and 1.49 (0.86-2.59), respectively. Stigmata of recent hemorrhage were more readily identified with urgent colonoscopy OR 2.85 (1.90-4.28). There were no differences in requirement for surgery, length of hospital stay or rate of endoscopic intervention. However, these effect sizes were limited by considerable heterogeneity, which was probably due to studies being conducted in different countries having different criteria for discharge and on variations in the type of endoscopic therapy for stigmata of recent hemorrhage. In conclusion, among patients with acute LGIB, there is no evidence that urgent colonoscopy reduces mortality, rebleeding or requirement for surgery or that it improves the rate of identification of the bleeding source. However, urgent colonoscopy does increase the rate of detection of stigmata of recent hemorrhage.
Copyright © 2017 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Hematochezia; Lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28262219     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  6 in total

1.  Early colonoscopy in patients with acute diverticular bleeding is associated with improvement in healthcare-resource utilization.

Authors:  Hamzeh Saraireh; Obada Tayyem; Mohamed Tausif Siddiqui; Bashar Hmoud; Mohammad Bilal
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2018-08-16

Review 2.  Paradigm shift: the Copernican revolution in diverticular disease.

Authors:  Angelo Zullo; Luigi Gatta; Roberto Vassallo; Vincenzo De Francesco; Raffaele Manta; Fabio Monica; Giulia Fiorini; Dino Vaira
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-02

3.  Trends in hospitalization, mortality, and timing of colonoscopy in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Kalpit Devani; Dhruvil Radadiya; Paris Charilaou; Tyler Aasen; Chakradhar M Reddy; Mark Young; Bhaumik Brahmbhatt; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage and rebleeding rate between early and elective colonoscopy in outpatient-onset acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ryota Niikura; Naoyoshi Nagata; Atsuo Yamada; Hisashi Doyama; Yasutoshi Shiratori; Tsutomu Nishida; Shu Kiyotoki; Tomoyuki Yada; Tomoki Fujita; Tetsuya Sumiyoshi; Kenkei Hasatani; Tatsuya Mikami; Tetsuro Honda; Katsuhiro Mabe; Kazuo Hara; Katsumi Yamamoto; Mariko Takeda; Munenori Takata; Mototsugu Tanaka; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Diagnostic and therapeutic treatment modalities for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathryn Oakland; Jennifer Isherwood; Conor Lahiff; Petra Goldsmith; Michael Desborough; Katherine S Colman; Richard Guy; Raman Uberoi; Michael F Murphy; James E East; Sally Hopewell; Vipul Jairath
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-29

6.  Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment without Early Colonoscopy in Patients with Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Hirosato Doi; Keita Sasajima; Masanori Takahashi; Taira Sato; Iichirou Ootsu; Ryo Chinzei
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.