PURPOSE: To develop a method of suppressing the multi-resonance fat signal in diffusion-weighted imaging of skeletal muscle. This is particularly important when imaging patients with muscular dystrophies, a group of diseases which cause gradual replacement of muscle tissue by fat. THEORY AND METHODS: The signal from the olefinic fat peak at 5.3 ppm can significantly confound diffusion-tensor imaging measurements. Dixon olefinic fat suppression (DOFS), a magnitude-based chemical-shift-based method of suppressing the olefinic peak, is proposed. It is verified in vivo by performing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based quantification in the lower leg of seven healthy volunteers, and compared to two previously described fat-suppression techniques in regions with and without fat contamination. RESULTS: In the region without fat contamination, DOFS produces similar results to existing techniques, whereas in muscle contaminated by subcutaneous fat signal moved due to the chemical shift artefact, it consistently showed significantly higher (P = 0.018) mean diffusivity (MD). Because fat presence lowers MD, this suggests improved fat suppression. CONCLUSION: DOFS offers superior fat suppression and enhances quantitative measurements in the muscle in the presence of fat. DOFS is an alternative to spectral olefinic fat suppression. Magn Reson Med 79:152-159, 2018.
PURPOSE: To develop a method of suppressing the multi-resonance fat signal in diffusion-weighted imaging of skeletal muscle. This is particularly important when imaging patients with muscular dystrophies, a group of diseases which cause gradual replacement of muscle tissue by fat. THEORY AND METHODS: The signal from the olefinic fat peak at 5.3 ppm can significantly confound diffusion-tensor imaging measurements. Dixon olefinic fat suppression (DOFS), a magnitude-based chemical-shift-based method of suppressing the olefinic peak, is proposed. It is verified in vivo by performing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based quantification in the lower leg of seven healthy volunteers, and compared to two previously described fat-suppression techniques in regions with and without fat contamination. RESULTS: In the region without fat contamination, DOFS produces similar results to existing techniques, whereas in muscle contaminated by subcutaneous fat signal moved due to the chemical shift artefact, it consistently showed significantly higher (P = 0.018) mean diffusivity (MD). Because fat presence lowers MD, this suggests improved fat suppression. CONCLUSION: DOFS offers superior fat suppression and enhances quantitative measurements in the muscle in the presence of fat. DOFS is an alternative to spectral olefinic fat suppression. Magn Reson Med 79:152-159, 2018.
Authors: E E Sigmund; S H Baete; T Luo; K Patel; D Wang; I Rossi; A Duarte; M Bruno; D Mossa; A Femia; S Ramachandran; D Stoffel; J S Babb; A G Franks; J Bencardino Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthew Farrow; Andrew J Grainger; Ai Lyn Tan; Maya H Buch; Paul Emery; John P Ridgway; Thorsten Feiweier; Steven F Tanner; John Biglands Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Stefan Ruschke; Michael Dieckmeyer; Maximilian Diefenbach; Daniela Franz; Alexandra S Gersing; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Gustav J Strijkers; Ericky C A Araujo; Noura Azzabou; David Bendahan; Andrew Blamire; Jedrek Burakiewicz; Pierre G Carlier; Bruce Damon; Xeni Deligianni; Martijn Froeling; Arend Heerschap; Kieren G Hollingsworth; Melissa T Hooijmans; Dimitrios C Karampinos; George Loudos; Guillaume Madelin; Benjamin Marty; Armin M Nagel; Aart J Nederveen; Jules L Nelissen; Francesco Santini; Olivier Scheidegger; Fritz Schick; Christopher Sinclair; Ralph Sinkus; Paulo L de Sousa; Volker Straub; Glenn Walter; Hermien E Kan Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis Date: 2019
Authors: Elisabeth Klupp; Barbara Cervantes; Sarah Schlaeger; Stephanie Inhuber; Florian Kreuzpointer; Ansgar Schwirtz; Alexander Rohrmeier; Michael Dieckmeyer; Dennis M Hedderich; Maximilian N Diefenbach; Friedemann Freitag; Ernst J Rummeny; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Melissa T Hooijmans; Martijn Froeling; Zaida Koeks; Jan J G M Verschuuren; Andrew Webb; Erik H Niks; Hermien E Kan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.044