Literature DB >> 28261691

Graphene-Metal Composite Sensors with Near-Zero Temperature Coefficient of Resistance.

Brandon C Marin1, Samuel E Root1, Armando D Urbina1, Eden Aklile1, Rachel Miller1, Aliaksandr V Zaretski1, Darren J Lipomi1.   

Abstract

This article describes the design of piezoresistive thin-film sensors based on single-layer graphene decorated with metallic nanoislands. The defining characteristic of these composite thin films is that they can be engineered to exhibit a temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) that is close to zero. A mechanical sensor with this property is stable against temperature fluctuations of the type encountered during operations in the real world, for example, in a wearable sensor. The metallic nanoislands are grown on graphene through thermal deposition of metals (gold or palladium) at a low nominal thickness. Metallic films exhibit an increase in resistance with temperature (positive TCR), whereas graphene exhibits a decrease in resistance with temperature (negative TCR). By varying the amount of deposition, the morphology of the nanoislands can be tuned such that the TCRs of a metal and graphene cancel out. The quantitative analysis of scanning electron microscope images reveals the importance of the surface coverage of the metal (as opposed to the total mass of the metal deposited). The stability of the sensor to temperature fluctuations that might be encountered in the outdoors is demonstrated by subjecting a wearable pulse sensor to simulated solar irradiation.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28261691      PMCID: PMC5331455          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Wearable and implantable sensors can be designed to detect a range of chemical, biophysical, electromagnetic, and thermal stimuli. However, some types of sensors are responsive only to one type of stimulus. For example, strain gauges based on metallic thin films are sensitive not only to mechanical deformation but also to temperature. Unwanted sensitivity to temperature could arise because of, for example, thermal expansion of the substrate or the fact that the conductivity of a metal depends on temperature (i.e., the temperature coefficient of resistance, TCR). Our laboratory has previously shown that metallic nanoislands on graphene are sensitive to a wide range of mechanical, optical, chemical, and electrophysiological signals.[1,2] During the course of these experiments, we noticed that thermal drift—that is, small changes in the local ambient temperature—produced changes in the electrical resistance of the sensors that were comparable to or greater than those produced by the stimuli of interest. The problem of convoluted signals is not unique to this type of sensor but is rarely reported for experiments on other types of sensors, which are performed in well-controlled environments. Decoupling the signal of interest from unwanted signals can be addressed in one of at least two ways: (1) by processing the signals using back-end electronics or (2) by designing the material used for sensing. This paper uses the second approach—in which decoupling of thermal drift is accomplished by the material itself. Because graphene exhibits a TCR that is less than zero[3] and metals exhibit a TCR that is greater than zero,[4] we fabricated composite thin films consisting of metallic nanoislands supported by single-layer graphene (Figure ). (Metallic nanoislands are the disconnected structures that form with low nominal thicknesses when metals are deposited through physical vapor deposition.) By tuning the amount of metals deposited—and thus the interconnectivity and surface coverage of the nanoislands—it was possible to engineer the composite material such that the TCR of the two different materials canceled out to near zero.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the process used to generate and transfer metallic nanoislands on graphene. Nanoislands are formed by thermal evaporation of metals onto copper-supported graphene. The backing copper is etched using a basic ammonium persulfate solution. The film can then be transferred to a substrate of interest and addressed for electrical measurements.

Schematic diagram of the process used to generate and transfer metallic nanoislands on graphene. Nanoislands are formed by thermal evaporation of metals onto copper-supported graphene. The backing copper is etched using a basic ammonium persulfate solution. The film can then be transferred to a substrate of interest and addressed for electrical measurements. Previous work on the topic of zero-TCR materials has been primarily concerned with bulk metal alloys and other materials that require complex processing. Metal alloys include manganin and constantin; the latter has been used for over a century in the components of thermocouples. New alloys[5−7] have been developed, along with tunable-TCR materials such as metalpolymer composites,[8−11] carbon mixtures,[12] and semiconductor composites.[13−15] Optical strain sensors that are temperature-independent have also been reported.[16] However, polymer and carbon mixtures involve complex solution processing, and metal alloys reported so far have been bulk materials, as opposed to thin films. For near-zero-TCR sensing elements to be useful in flexible and wearable devices, it is desirable to have active materials that are thin, transparent, and mechanically robust. A single layer of graphene behaves as a zero-gap semiconductor with a negative TCR at room temperature. The resistivity is dominated by the charge-carrier concentration and decreases with temperature as more hot carriers become available.[17] This phenomenon is in contrast to metals, which typically have a positive TCR owing to an increase in both inelastic electron scattering and lattice spacing with temperature.[18] Given our previous experience with metal nanoislands on graphene as a platform for multimodal sensing,[2,19] we hypothesized that a zero-TCR sensor could be fabricated if the right amount of metal was deposited onto the graphene such that the effects of each material cancel each other out. To design this material, we characterized the effect of deposition thickness and island morphology on the TCR of the graphenemetal composites. Gold and palladium were selected as the metals to test this hypothesis because of their widespread use in thermal and chemical thin-film sensing and disparate morphologies formed when evaporated onto graphene.[1,20]

Results and Discussion

Thermoresistive Behavior of Metal Nanoislands

The relationship between electrical resistance, temperature, and thickness for metal nanoislands on graphene is summarized in Figure a (gold) and 2b (palladium). The reported thicknesses are the “nominal” values measured using the quartz crystal microbalance in the evaporation chamber. (The true thickness is poorly defined because of the disconnected nature of the nanoisland films.) To find the TCR of these samples, we measured the normalized resistance as a function of temperature (from 30 to 65 °C); the TCR is the slope of this curve. As we expected, the TCR of the composite films exhibited a strong dependence on the nominal thickness of the metallic film. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images shown in Figure c–h suggest that the morphology—that is, interconnectivity or fractional surface coverage—also influences the sensitivity to temperature.
Figure 2

Thermoresistive behavior and morphology of gold and palladium nanoislands. The temperature-dependent normalized resistance is plotted for gold nanoislands (a) and palladium nanoislands (b) of varied nominal thicknesses. SEM micrographs depicting negative-TCR isolated nanoislands for 3 nm of gold (c) and 0.5 nm of palladium (d), near-zero TCR, partially percolated structures for 8 nm of gold (e) and 0.9 nm of palladium (f), and positive TCR, fully percolated structures for 11 nm of gold (g) and 3.0 nm of palladium (h). All SEM images are under the same magnification.

Thermoresistive behavior and morphology of gold and palladium nanoislands. The temperature-dependent normalized resistance is plotted for gold nanoislands (a) and palladium nanoislands (b) of varied nominal thicknesses. SEM micrographs depicting negative-TCR isolated nanoislands for 3 nm of gold (c) and 0.5 nm of palladium (d), near-zero TCR, partially percolated structures for 8 nm of gold (e) and 0.9 nm of palladium (f), and positive TCR, fully percolated structures for 11 nm of gold (g) and 3.0 nm of palladium (h). All SEM images are under the same magnification. The SEM images in Figure c,d show distinct differences between the morphologies of the negative-TCR composites of gold and palladium, respectively. At a nominal thickness of 4 nm, the gold assembles into large separated islands with sharp crystalline facets. Palladium nanoislands, in contrast, are smaller than gold nanoislands at all nominal thicknesses. Moreover, they exhibit a higher fractional coverage at substantially lower nominal thicknesses (0.5 nm). It also appears that the palladium nanoislands may be interconnected. The nominal thickness of deposition that gave near-zero TCR was 8 nm for gold and 0.9 nm for palladium. The SEM image in Figure e shows that gold forms partially percolated fractal structures that resulted from isolated nanoislands coalescing in a disordered fashion during the growth process. On the other hand, the palladium nanoislands did not coalesce but did appear to be in intimate physical contact (Figure f). We attribute the differences in morphology to the differences in relative interaction energies between the surface and the metal nanoislands: palladium has a stronger attraction to the surface and a closer epitaxial registry (a smaller lattice constant).[21] Therefore, the palladium nanoislands are less mobile than the gold nanoislands during the growth process.[1] The SEM images in Figure g,h show that gold and palladium form completely percolated nanostructures with a nominal thickness greater than 11 and 3 nm, respectively. Percolated structures in both materials yielded a positive TCR—evidence that the thermoresistive behavior approaches that of a thin film of metal. In general, these results show that the TCR can be controlled as a function of nominal thickness of deposition. In cases when it is necessary to eliminate thermal drift, a substrate with a near-zero TCR can be repeatedly fabricated using either palladium or gold by targeting a specific thickness. Moreover, this procedure should be straightforward to transfer to any other transition metal of interest for a specific device application. Interestingly, we found a large difference in the nominal thickness that produced a near-zero TCR of palladium (0.9 nm) versus that of gold (8 nm). Although morphologies can be reproduced by holding the deposition parameters constant (chamber pressure, evaporation rate, substrate, and nominal thickness),[22] the nominal thickness is not a true indication of the thickness of individual nanoislands. Thus, we found it necessary to correlate the TCR with other morphological parameters to give a more sophisticated description of the relationship between the TCR and the morphology of the metal nanoislands.

Image Analysis and Modeling of the Thermoresistive Behavior of Metal Nanoislands

Image analysis was performed on the SEM micrographs of gold nanoislands to quantitatively analyze the trends between morphology and thermoresistive behavior. A thresholding algorithm known as Otsu’s method[23] was used to differentiate the metal structures from graphene. The algorithm operates on the grayscale image by assuming two classes of pixels, which fall above or below a threshold value (metal vs graphene). The optimum threshold value is defined as the one that minimizes the variance within each class of pixels. Once differentiated, distinct islands are labeled and various properties are computed including surface coverage and projected area. From Figure a, we can see that TCR varies linearly with coverage. Examples of processed images are given in Figure b–d, where the separate islands are colored by their area.
Figure 3

Morphological dependence of the TCR of gold nanoislands obtained through image analysis. (a) Plot showing linear dependence of TCR on fractional coverage. Representative processed images for (b) negative TCR (4 nm), (c) near-zero TCR (8 nm), and (d) positive TCR (11 nm) gold nanoislands. Islands are colored by the projected area (nm2). The film in (d) is entirely white because it is a single interconnected structure of area 225k nm2.

Morphological dependence of the TCR of gold nanoislands obtained through image analysis. (a) Plot showing linear dependence of TCR on fractional coverage. Representative processed images for (b) negative TCR (4 nm), (c) near-zero TCR (8 nm), and (d) positive TCR (11 nm) gold nanoislands. Islands are colored by the projected area (nm2). The film in (d) is entirely white because it is a single interconnected structure of area 225k nm2. Given the observed dependence of TCR with coverage, we developed a model to describe the thermoresistive behavior of this composite material. Adomov et al.[24] have demonstrated that the TCR of vacuum-deposited gold films depends on thickness, d, and can be described aswhere αAu is the TCR of gold and l is the electron mean free path (400 Å). The actual island thickness can be related to the nominal thickness using the coverage, θ, and the following relationFinally, the TCR of the gold islands can be combined with the TCR of the supporting graphene (αGr) using a composite theory, with coverage as the fractional variable The results of our model are compared with the experimental data in Figure a and demonstrate good agreement. Additional details on the composite model are available in the Supporting Information. The results of our model suggested that the lateral distribution of the metal was more important than the total mass deposited. To test this idea, we subjected an 11 nm gold nanoisland sample to rapid thermal annealing (RTA), a method that has commonly been used to change the morphology of metallic films on the nanoscale.[25,26] The sample was heated from room temperature to 600 °C in 12 s and held at the elevated temperature for 5 min. This thermal treatment changed the morphology of the metal from a percolated network to a distribution of isolated nanoparticles (Figure S3). The TCR of the sample changed concomitantly from positive to negative (Figure S4). This experiment unambiguously demonstrated the importance of interconnectivity and surface coverage of the metal islands on the TCR of the composite material.

Wearable Application of Sensors with Near-Zero TCR

To demonstrate the utility of thin films resistant to thermal drift, we fabricated a wearable sensor for detecting the human pulse using gold nanoislands. Nanoisland-graphene films with positive, negative, and near-zero TCRs were transferred onto Kapton tape, addressed with carbon paint, and then adhered onto the wrist, as depicted in Figure a. A schematic diagram of the sensor is shown in Figure S7. To simulate a plausible real-world scenario where an abrupt heating event would occur, we placed the sensor (on the wrist) over a solar simulator lamp to imitate the direct illumination of a sensor by the sun. As indicated by the gray-shaded area in Figure b, the gold nanoislands with the near-zero TCR exhibited a minimal thermal drift. On the other hand, the positive- and negative-TCR sensors experienced a substantial drift owing to heating caused by direct illumination. When placed on the wrist, periodic strain caused by the contractions of the radial artery induced a periodic change in resistivity. This pulse signal was detected by the sensor (inset Figure b). To address whether the sensitivity of the wearable sensor was affected by changing the nominal thickness of the metal to attain a near-zero TCR, we examined the data closely in Figure b. Assuming that the strain caused by a pulse was constant (because the same subject was used for all measurements in Figure b), the pulse signal was most pronounced in the near-zero-TCR sensor, indicating that the sensor performance was not diminished by changing the nominal thickness of metals. We then tested for any possible interference from temperature-dependent conductivity of the carbon paint itself. We attached copper wires to a gold film (50 nm) using a drop of carbon paint with similar dimensions to those used in the wearable sensors. Continuous measurement of resistance as a function of temperature from ambient temperature to 60 °C revealed a net increase in resistance of <1%. Given this small effect and the fact that the samples were all connected using the same materials, we can confirm that the observed differences in TCR between the graphene-nanoisland films were due to the coverage and interconnectivity of the nanoislands.
Figure 4

Thermal drift of a wearable pulse sensor under simulated sunlight. (a) Wearable pulse sensor with the nanoisland portion outlined in black dashed lines. (b) Normalized resistance is plotted versus time with a period of illumination by a solar simulator lamp, which is marked by the gray-shaded area. The lamp heated the sensor to a steady-state temperature of approximately 45 °C after 30 s as measured using an infrared thermometer. The inset shows a clear pulse, with dicrotic notches clearly visible.

Thermal drift of a wearable pulse sensor under simulated sunlight. (a) Wearable pulse sensor with the nanoisland portion outlined in black dashed lines. (b) Normalized resistance is plotted versus time with a period of illumination by a solar simulator lamp, which is marked by the gray-shaded area. The lamp heated the sensor to a steady-state temperature of approximately 45 °C after 30 s as measured using an infrared thermometer. The inset shows a clear pulse, with dicrotic notches clearly visible.

Conclusions

We reported a new strategy to suppress thermal drift in sensors. This strategy is based on the precise control of materials in sensors composed of graphene decorated with metal nanoislands. By systematically varying the nominal thickness of the metal deposited, we found optimal deposition parameters to produce composite thin films with near-zero TCR for both gold and palladium on graphene. Differences in the self-assembly process of gold nanoislands suggested that surface coverage and interconnectivity were the most important morphological parameters in determining the TCR of the composite material. Image analysis of SEM images provided quantitative evidence to support this conclusion and enabled the development of a model to describe the thermoresistive behavior of the composite material. Proof-of-concept wearable sensors were fabricated to demonstrate the stability of the electrical signal to variations in surface temperature produced by sunlight. This material-design strategy should be easily generalizable to other transition metals for device-specific applications (e.g., chemical sensing) and provides a robust platform for the development of devices that minimize fluctuations due to temperature. More generally, these experiments demonstrate how well-known materials can be combined in new ways to design thin-film composites with useful properties for device applications.

Experimental Section

Metal Nanoisland Sensor Fabrication

Metal nanoislands were fabricated by physical vapor deposition using an AJA International thermal evaporator (Orion-class). A thin film of palladium or gold was deposited onto graphene supported on copper foil at a rate of 0.05 Å/s. Chamber pressure during deposition was 2.0 × 10–7 Torr. The resultant structure comprised nanoislands on graphene on copper foil (nanoisland/Gr/Cu). Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) (1 kDa, 200 nm) was spin-coated (1 wt % solution in anisole at 4k rpm for 60 s) onto the nanoisland side of the nanoisland/Gr/Cu sample. The backing copper foil was etched by floating the sample copper-side-down in an aqueous ammonium persulfate solution (50 mg/mL) for approximately 3 h. The samples were then transferred onto a 1 in. × 3 in. glass slide. The PMMA layer was then dissolved using neat acetone at 40 °C.

SEM

An FEI XL30 SFEG instrument with an FEI Sirion column and Through-Lens Detector was used for SEM micrographs of metal nanoislands. An accelerating voltage of 10 kV and a spot of 50 μm were used for imaging.

TCR Measurements

Resistance measurements were recorded using a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter. All resistance measurements for wearable applications and TCR calculations were conducted using two-point measurements. To decouple the possible effects of the contact resistance of the carbon paint from the intrinsic resistance of the graphene-nanoisland films, we compared the resistances obtained using two-point measurements to those obtained using four-point measurements. The fact that the resistance values differed by less than 1% suggested that the contact resistance due to the carbon paint was negligible. All samples had the same dimensions. The samples for TCR measurements were heated using an Instec FS1 heating stage with an Instec mK2000 temperature controller and electrically addressed with eutectic gallium–indium (EGaIn).

Image Analysis

An object-oriented Python code was developed to perform image analysis of the SEM images. This code made extensive use of the Mahotas package (see Supporting Information) to distinguish the metal from graphene, identify separate nanoislands, and quantify the area of the individual nanoislands as well as their fractional coverage over the graphene. The code can be easily adapted for the analysis of similar nanostructures and is openly available at github.

RTA

RTA was performed using an AG Associates Heatpulse 610. The samples were heated from room temperature to 600 °C in 12 s (50 °C/s) under forming gas (5% hydrogen/95% nitrogen) to aid reflow of the metal. The sample was held at the elevated temperature for 5 min.
  7 in total

1.  Processes for non-destructive transfer of graphene: widening the bottleneck for industrial scale production.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Zaretski; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Using the thickness of graphene to template lateral subnanometer gaps between gold nanostructures.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Zaretski; Brandon C Marin; Herad Moetazedi; Tyler J Dill; Liban Jibril; Casey Kong; Andrea R Tao; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Small temperature coefficient of resistivity of graphene/graphene oxide hybrid membranes.

Authors:  Pengzhan Sun; Miao Zhu; Kunlin Wang; Minlin Zhong; Jinquan Wei; Dehai Wu; Hongwei Zhu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.229

4.  Selective enhancement of Raman or fluorescence spectra of biomolecules using specifically annealed thick gold films.

Authors:  N Strekal; A Maskevich; S Maskevich; J C Jardillier; I Nabiev
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  The rise of graphene.

Authors:  A K Geim; K S Novoselov
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  SERS-enhanced piezoplasmonic graphene composite for biological and structural strain mapping.

Authors:  Brandon C Marin; Justin Liu; Eden Aklile; Armando D Urbina; Andrew S-C Chiang; Natalie Lawrence; Shaochen Chen; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 7.790

7.  Metallic Nanoislands on Graphene as Highly Sensitive Transducers of Mechanical, Biological, and Optical Signals.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Zaretski; Samuel E Root; Alex Savchenko; Elena Molokanova; Adam D Printz; Liban Jibril; Gaurav Arya; Mark Mercola; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 11.189

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Metallic nanoislands on graphene: A metamaterial for chemical, mechanical, optical, and biological applications.

Authors:  Brandon C Marin; Julian Ramirez; Samuel E Root; Eden Aklile; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Nanoscale Horiz       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 10.989

2.  Combining High Sensitivity and Dynamic Range: Wearable Thin-Film Composite Strain Sensors of Graphene, Ultrathin Palladium, and PEDOT:PSS.

Authors:  Julian Ramírez; Daniel Rodriquez; Armando Urbina; Anne Cardenas; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  ACS Appl Nano Mater       Date:  2019-03-25

3.  Laser patterned, high-power graphene paper resistor with dual temperature coefficient of resistance.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Kapil Bhatt; Pramod Kumar; Sandeep Sharma; Amit Kumar; C C Tripathi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Development and Applications of Embedded Passives and Interconnects Employing Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Shanggui Deng; Sharad Bhatnagar; Shan He; Nabeel Ahmad; Abdul Rahaman; Jingrong Gao; Jagriti Narang; Ibrahim Khalifa; Anindya Nag
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.719

5.  Protective Layers Based on Carbon Paint To Yield High-Quality Large-Area Molecular Junctions with Low Contact Resistance.

Authors:  Senthil Kumar Karuppannan; Esther Hui Lin Neoh; Ayelet Vilan; Christian A Nijhuis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.