| Literature DB >> 28261540 |
W A Moeglein1, R Griswold1, B L Mehdi2,3, N D Browning2,3,4, J Teuton5.
Abstract
In situ scanning transmission electron microscopy is being developed for numerous applications in the study of nucleation and growth under electrochemical driving forces. For this type of experiment, one of the key parameters is to identify when nucleation initiates. Typically, the process of identifying the moment that crystals begin to form is a manual process requiring the user to perform an observation and respond accordingly (adjust focus, magnification, translate the stage, etc.). However, as the speed of the cameras being used to perform these observations increases, the ability of a user to "catch" the important initial stage of nucleation decreases (there is more information that is available in the first few milliseconds of the process). Here, we show that video shot boundary detection can automatically detect frames where a change in the image occurs. We show that this method can be applied to quickly and accurately identify points of change during crystal growth. This technique allows for automated segmentation of a digital stream for further analysis and the assignment of arbitrary time stamps for the initiation of processes that are independent of the user's ability to observe and react.Entities:
Keywords: Big data analytics; Electrochemistry; In situ transmission electron microscopy; Nucleation and growth; Shot boundary detection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28261540 PMCID: PMC5313570 DOI: 10.1186/s40679-016-0034-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Struct Chem Imaging ISSN: 2198-0926
Fig. 1a Schematic of the operando nanobattery and b high-angle annular dark-field, HAADF, image frame from the movie of the electrodeposited Li on a Pt electrode in 1M LiPF6 in PC electrolyte (in a background) [7, 8]
Fig. 2An abrupt shot transition is seen when adjusting focus [8]
Fig. 3A gradual shot transition is seen as growth occurs [8]
Fig. 4Summary of video transitions [8]
Fig. 5Macroblock sum of variance
Fig. 6Difference in macroblock sum of variance compared to the square of the differences
Fig. 7Cumulative sum of squared differences
Annotated frames
| Frame start | Frame end | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 185 | No change |
| 186 | 242 | Change (growth) |
| 243 | 266 | Change (shrinkage) |
| 267 | 278 | Change (background replacement) |
| 279 | 387 | No change |
Identified region boundaries
| Frame start | Frame end |
|---|---|
| 186 | 209 |
| 259 | 266 |
| 267 | 278 |
Fig. 8Sum of variance and sum of squared differences of SoV with change points identified