| Literature DB >> 28261345 |
Jie Shen1, Weiwei Kong1, Yuanna Wu1, Haozhen Ren2, Jia Wei1, Yang Yang1, Yan Yang1, Lixia Yu1, Wenxian Guan2, Baorui Liu1.
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers based individualized chemotherapy can improve efficacy. However, for those advanced patients, it may be impossible to obtain the tissues from operation. Tissues from biopsy may not be always enough for gene detection. Thus, biomarker from blood could be a non-invasive and useful tool to provide real-time information in the procedure of treatment. To further understand the role of plasma mRNA in chemo-efficiency prediction, several mRNA expression levels were assessed in plasma and paired tumor tissues from 133 locally advanced gastric cancer patients (stage III), and mRNA levels were correlated with chemosensitivity to docetaxel, pemetrexed, platinum, and irinotecan. mRNA expression level in 64 advanced gastric cancer patients (stage IV) was also examined (55 in test group, and 9 in control), and chemotherapy in the test group were given according to the plasma gene detection. As a result, in the 133 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (Stage III), correlations were observed between the mRNA expression of plasma/tumor BRCA1 levels and docetaxel sensitivity (P<0.001), plasma/tumor TS and pemetrexed sensitivity (P<0.001), plasma/tumor BRCA1 and platinum sensitivity (plasma, P=0.016; tumor, P<0.001), and plasma/tumor TOPO1 and irinotecan sensitivity (plasma, P=0.015; tumor, P=0.011). Among another 64 patients with advanced cancer (Stage IV), the median OS of test group was 15.5m (95% CI=10.1 to 20.9m), the PFS was 9.1m (95% CI=8.0 to 10.2m), which were significant longer than the control (P=0.047 for OS, P=0.038 for PFS). The mortality risk was higher in the control than patients treated according to the plasma gene detection (HR in the control=2.34, 95% CI=0.93 to 5.88, P=0.071). Plasma mRNA as liquid biopsy could be ideal recourse for examination to predict chemo-sensitivity in gastric cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Plasma mRNA; chemosensitivity; gastric cancer; individualized chemotherapy.; liquid biopsy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28261345 PMCID: PMC5332895 DOI: 10.7150/jca.17369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Flow Chart Showing Patient Disposition and Experiments Performed.
Figure 2Chemotherapy regency were given according to the gene expression in the test group.
Patient Characteristics of pilot study
| Characteristic | Validation Study N=133 |
|---|---|
| 60 (31-82) | |
| <60y | 59 |
| >=60y | 74 |
| Male | 101 |
| Female | 32 |
| Distal stomach | 51 |
| Proximal stomach | 52 |
| Whole stomach | 30 |
| III | 133 |
| 2 | 27 |
| 3 | 67 |
| Mixed 2-3 | 39 |
| Yes | 133 |
Patient characteristics of 64 stage IV gastric cancer patients.
| Characteristic | Totol N=64 N (%) | Test N=55 N (%) | Control N=9 N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62(35-79) | 62(35-79) | 63(48-77) | |
| <60y | 25 | 22 | 3 |
| >=60y | 39 | 33 | 6 |
| Male | 47 | 39 | 8 |
| Female | 17 | 16 | 1 |
| Intestinal type | 17 | 15 | 2 |
| Diffuse type | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Mixed type | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Unknown | 35 | 30 | 5 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 34 | 28 | 6 |
| 3 | 16 | 14 | 2 |
| Unknown | 14 | 13 | 1 |
| No | 47 | 40 | 7 |
| Yes | 17 | 15 | 2 |
| Liver | 28 | 24 | 4 |
| Lung | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Pancreas | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Adrenal gland | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Retroperitoneal, or longitudinal, or supraclavicular lymph nodes | 22 | 19 | 3 |
| Malignant pleural effusion or ascites | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Abdominal cavity seeding | 18 | 15 | 3 |
| Bone | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Docetaxel+S-1(BRCA1high) | 22 | 13 | 9 |
| Oxaliplatin+S-1( BRCA1low) | 21 | 21 | 0 |
| Pemetrexed+S-1(TSlow) | 14 | 14 | 0 |
| Irinotecan+S-1(TOPO1high) | 7 | 7 | 0 |
Mean mRNA levels in plasma and tumor
| Gene | N | Mean mRNA values (range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | Tumor | ||
| 133 | 1.10 (0.06-3.77) | 7.80 (0.24-30.80) | |
| 133 | 1.23 (0.02-7.25) | 9.78 (0.13-46.55) | |
| 133 | 0.31 (0.02-1.80) | 15.00 (0.33-46.30) | |
| 133 | 0.68 (0.01-4.36) | 7.60 (0.56-37.81) | |
| 133 | 0.45 (0.01-2.17) | 4.30 (0.26-17.99) | |
Figure 3Chemosensitivity in vitro was associated with the plasma mRNA expression levels of BRCA1, TS and TOPO1 in 133 gastric cancer patients. Figure 3A: plasma BRCA1 levels and docetaxel sensitivity (P<0.001); Figure 3B: plasma TS levels and pemetrexed sensitivity (P<0.001); Figure 3C: plasma BRCA1 levels and platinum sensitivity (P=0.016); Figure 3D: plasma TOPO1 levels and irinotecan sensitivity (P=0.015).
The Cut-off for plasma gene expression
| BRCA1 | TOPO1 | TS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low expressed | BRCA1<0.755 | TOPO1<0.376 | TS<0.604 |
| Media expressed | 0.755≤BRCA1<2.163 | 0.376≤TOPO1<0.839 | 0.604≤TS<0.873 |
| High expressed | 2.163≤BRCA1 | 0.839≤TOPO1 | 0.873≤TS |
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free-survival (A) and overall survival (B) in advanced (stage IV) gastric cancer patients. A total of 55 patients received chemotherapy according to their plasma gene detection (see Table 4), and another 9 were treated with docetaxel+S-1 as control. OS = overall survival; PFS: progression-free-survival; CI = confidence interval.
PFS between different groups of individualized chemotherapy.
| P | Oxalipatin+S-1 | Pemetrexed+S-1 | Irinotecan+S-1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.016 | 0.441 | 0.459 | |
| 0.162 | 0.258 | ||
| 0.397 |
Figure 5PFS(A) and OS (B) of different groups of individualized chemotherapy and control.
OS between different groups of individualized chemotherapy.
| P | Oxalipatin+S-1 | Pemetrexed+S-1 | Irinotecan+S-1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.035 | 0.435 | 0.334 | |
| 0.179 | 0.201 | ||
| 0.504 |
Median overall survival and hazard ratios for risk of mortality in 64 stage IV gastric cancer patients receiving control or individualized chemotherapy.
| Variable | No. of patients | Overall survival | OS of mortality | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month(95% CI) | P | HR(95% CI) | P | ||
| 0.855 | |||||
| No | 47 | 12.7(9.4 to 16.0) | 1.23(0.48 to 3.20) | 0.668 | |
| Yes | 17 | 14.0(8.0 to 20.0) | 1.00(referent) | ||
| 0.003 | |||||
| 0-1 | 48 | 16.4(11.4 to 21.4) | 1.00(referent) | ||
| >=2 | 16 | 10.5(7.3 to 13.7) | 2.55(1.12 to 5.83) | 0.026 | |
| 0.418 | |||||
| <60y | 25 | 17.4(9.3 to 25.5) | 1.00(referent) | ||
| >=60y | 39 | 12.6(11.2 to 14.0) | 1.37(0.66 to 2.85) | 0.401 | |
| 0.762 | |||||
| 2 | 34 | 13.3(9.0 to 17.6) | 0.96(0.33 to 2.84) | 0.946 | |
| 3 | 16 | 12.3(8.4 to 16.1) | 1.57(0.46 to 5.36) | 0.470 | |
| unknown | 14 | 14.0(6.6 to 21.4) | 1.00(referent) | ||
| 0.006 | |||||
| 1 | 27 | 19.1(15.6 to 22.6) | 1.00(referent) | ||
| >=2 | 28 | 10.8(8.9 to 12.6) | 2.16(1.01 to 4.65) | 0.048 | |
| Control | 9 | 9.9(3.2 to 16.5) | 0.047 | 2.34(0.93 to 5.88) | 0.071 |
| Plasma gene test | 55 | 15.5(10.1 to 20.9) | 1.00(referent) | ||
Figure 6The CT scan of the patient received chemotherapy according to his plasma gene detection. There was partial remission after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. 4 cycles later, the disease was well controlled.