| Literature DB >> 28261036 |
Haoxiang Xu1, Xuemin Xiao2, Yanyan He1, Xiaofeng Zhang1, Chengrang Li1, Qiuxia Mao1, Xinfeng Wu1, Baoxi Wang3.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28261036 PMCID: PMC5329110 DOI: 10.5114/ada.2017.65626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Dermatol Alergol ISSN: 1642-395X Impact factor: 1.837
Characteristics of healthy control and patient groups
| Group | Number | Age (range) [years] | Disease history (range) [years] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Male | Female | |||
| Healthy control | 13 | 11 | 2 | 45.2 ±19.8 (20–77) | – |
| Hurley I | 18 | 14 | 4 | 41.5 ±19.2 (15–74) | 25.6 ±12.8 (1–40) |
| Hurley II | 12 | 10 | 2 | 40.3 ±20.6 (17–82) | 27.8 ±13.3 (1–42) |
| Hurley III | 14 | 12 | 2 | 44.2 ±23.7 (17–79) | 26.9 ±15.5 (2–46) |
Figure 1Comparison of serum IL-6 levels between healthy controls and HS patients with different degrees of disease severity. Serum IL-6 levels in a group of Hurley stage I, II, and III patients were 33.4 ±8.9 pg/ml (range: 22.3–52.8 pg/ml), 145.6 ±33.6 pg/ml (range: 94.6–198.0 pg/ml), and 191.4 ±48.1 pg/ml (range: 106.4–301.1 pg/ml), respectively. Compared to IL-6 levels in the healthy control group (34.9 ±11.4 pg/ml, range: 18.8–55.5 pg/ml), the serum IL-6 levels in Hurley stage II and III patients were significantly increased, and the difference was statistically significant (p-values of both < 0.001)
Comparison of serum IL-6 levels in different groups of HS patients
| Parameter | Number of cases | Serum IL-6 level ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 36 | 120.0 ±48.0 | 0.843 |
| Female | 8 | 103.3 ±37.4 | ||
| Disease history [years] | < 10 | 15 | 118.6 ±48.0 | 0.99 |
| > 10 | 29 | 110.6 ±43.3 | ||
| Skin lesion area | < 5% | 34 | 93.8 ±62.1 | 0.004 |
| > 5% | 10 | 183.9 ±50.1 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | – | 39 | 110.5 ±37.8 | 0.698 |
| + | 5 | 130.2 ±41.4 | ||
| Smoking | – | 28 | 110.1 ±38.1 | 0.807 |
| + | 16 | 120.5 ±28.5 |
Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of two independent samples was used.
*According to factors including sex, disease history, lesion area, the presence of diabetes mellitus, and smoking, serum IL-6 levels of the healthy control group showed no statistical significance.