Literature DB >> 28260605

Gambling disorder, DSM-5 criteria and symptom severity.

Jon E Grant1, Brian L Odlaug2, Samuel R Chamberlain3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gambling disorder (GD) is a prevalent psychiatric condition whose severity is typically defined by the number of DSM-5 criteria met out of a maximum of nine. The relationships between the levels of gambling severity, thus defined, and other measures of psychopathology and everyday functioning are clinically important.
METHODS: Baseline data were collected in patients with GD, conducted from 2001 to 2016. Participants completed clinical interviews and questionnaires. The impact of disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) on clinical measures was characterized using analysis of variance models.
RESULTS: The sample included 574 adults with GD, of whom 73 (12.7%) had mild, 184 (32.1%) moderate, and 317 (55.2%) severe GD. The moderate and severe cases, compared to mild severity group tended be older, had later age of onset, lost more money to gambling in the preceding year, had worse quality of life, had higher state anxiety and depressive scores, consumed more nicotine via smoking per day, and had lower venturesomeness scores. The moderate and severe groups did not differ significantly on these measures, however. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for Pathological Gambling (PG-YBOCS) discriminated significantly between all three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Several measures of psychopathology and functional impact of gambling symptoms appear similar between moderate and severe GD cases, while mild cases are clearly differentiated from moderate and severe cases. Thus, the current working definition of GD symptom severity boundaries has important limitations in terms of potential clinical utility.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28260605      PMCID: PMC5395088          DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  14 in total

1.  The assessment of anxiety states by rating.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1959

2.  Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling.

Authors:  Jon E Grant; Marvin A Steinberg; Suck Won Kim; Bruce J Rounsaville; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  A framework for reporting outcomes in problem gambling treatment research: the Banff, Alberta Consensus.

Authors:  Michael Walker; Tony Toneatto; Marc N Potenza; Nancy Petry; Robert Ladouceur; David C Hodgins; Nady el-Guebaly; Enrique Echeburua; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 4.  Gambling disorders.

Authors:  David C Hodgins; Jonathan N Stea; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

Authors:  J H Patton; M S Stanford; E S Barratt
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-11

6.  Frequency of 5+/4+ drinks as a screener for drug use and drug-use disorders.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson; Wilson M Compton; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): a reliability and validity study.

Authors:  Suck Won Kim; Jon E Grant; Marc N Potenza; Carlos Blanco; Eric Hollander
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Dimensionality of lifetime alcohol abuse, dependence and binge drinking.

Authors:  Deborah S Hasin; Cheryl L Beseler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder: Underlying structure and applicability to specific groups of gamblers.

Authors:  Pawel Sleczka; Barbara Braun; Daniela Piontek; Gerhard Bühringer; Ludwig Kraus
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.756

10.  Latent class analysis of gambling subtypes and impulsive/compulsive associations: Time to rethink diagnostic boundaries for gambling disorder?

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Jan Stochl; Sarah A Redden; Brian L Odlaug; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Multidimensional Structure of Problem Gambling: An Evaluation of Four Gambling Categorization Instruments from an International Online Survey of Gamblers.

Authors:  Darren R Christensen; Robert J Williams; Samuel M Ofori-Dei
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-12

2.  Gambling, Gaming, and Internet Behavior in a Sexual Minority Perspective. A Cross-Sectional Study in Seven European Countries.

Authors:  Niroshani Broman; Fulvia Prever; Ester di Giacomo; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Anna Szczegielniak; Helena Hansson; Anders Håkansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 3.  Differences in problem and pathological gambling: A narrative review considering sex and gender.

Authors:  Corinna Gartner; Andreas Bickl; Sabine Härtl; Johanna K Loy; Laura Häffner
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 7.772

4.  Psychological aspects of infertility. A systematic review.

Authors:  Filip Szkodziak; Jarosław Krzyżanowski; Piotr Szkodziak
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Problematic use of digital media in children and adolescents with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to controls. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Maria Werling; Sajiv Kuzhippallil; Sophie Emery; Susanne Walitza; Renate Drechsler
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 7.772

6.  Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument of Health-Related Quality of Life Specific to Patients with Gambling Disorder: The Gambling Quality of Life Scale (GQoLS).

Authors:  Nicolas A Bonfils; Henri-Jean Aubin; Marie Grall-Bronnec; Julie Caillon; Pascal Perney; Frédéric Limosin; Amandine Luquiens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.