| Literature DB >> 28260345 |
J Xiao1, J F Sun, Q Q Wang, X Qi, H Y Yao.
Abstract
Using the guidelines of health economic evaluation reporting is conducive to regulating the contents of this reporting, improving the quality of studies into health economics evaluation. This article summarized the history of the guidelines and specified the instrument used to study " Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)" and the checklist about Consolidated Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-the two specific evaluation contents in this guideline, the article also introduced its present application status of the guideline and its pros and cons. The checklist of CHEERS emphasized the evaluation of this report, while QHES instrument focused on quantitative evaluation on the quality of economic studies. Despite different emphasis, the two guides are actually mutually complemented.Keywords: Economics, medical; Guidebooks; Quality assurance, health care
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28260345 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2017.03.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ISSN: 0253-9624