Literature DB >> 28259850

Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luke Hughes1, Bruce Paton2, Ben Rosenblatt3, Conor Gissane1, Stephen David Patterson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Low-load exercise training with blood flow restriction (BFR) can increase muscle strength and may offer an effective clinical musculoskeletal (MSK) rehabilitation tool. The aim of this review was to systematically analyse the evidence regarding the effectiveness of this novel training modality in clinical MSK rehabilitation.
DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature examining BFR training in clinical MSK rehabilitation (Research Registry; researchregistry91). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted across SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), PubMed and Science Direct databases, including the reference lists of relevant papers. Two independent reviewers extracted study characteristics and MSK and functional outcome measures. Study quality and reporting was assessed using the Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise. ELIGIBILITY: Search results were limited to exercise training studies investigating BFR training in clinical MSK rehabilitation, published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal in English.
RESULTS: Twenty studies were eligible, including ACL reconstruction (n=3), knee osteoarthritis (n=3), older adults at risk of sarcopenia (n=13) and patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (n=1). Analysis of pooled data indicated low-load BFR training had a moderate effect on increasing strength (Hedges' g=0.523, 95% CI 0.263 to 0.784, p<0.001), but was less effective than heavy-load training (Hedges' g=0.674, 95% CI 0.296 to 1.052, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with low-load training, low-load BFR training is more effective, tolerable and therefore a potential clinical rehabilitation tool. There is a need for the development of an individualised approach to training prescription to minimise patient risk and increase effectiveness. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood flow restriction; musculoskeletal; rehabilitation; strength

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259850     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  106 in total

1.  Exercise Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Sarcopenia. A Systematic Umbrella Review.

Authors:  D Beckwée; A Delaere; S Aelbrecht; V Baert; C Beaudart; O Bruyere; M de Saint-Hubert; I Bautmans
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Does Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction Affect Blood Pressure and Cardiac Autonomic Modulation in Older Adults?

Authors:  Karynne Grutter Lopes; Paulo Farinatti; Daniel Alexandre Bottino; Maria DAS Graças Coelho DE Souza; Priscila Alves Maranhão; Eliete Bouskela; Roberto Alves Lourenço; Ricardo Brandão DE Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Limb blood flow and tissue perfusion during exercise with blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Matthew A Kilgas; John McDaniel; Jon Stavres; Brandon S Pollock; Tyler J Singer; Steven J Elmer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Clinical safety of blood flow-restricted training? A comprehensive review of altered muscle metaboreflex in cardiovascular disease during ischemic exercise.

Authors:  Michelle Cristina-Oliveira; Kamila Meireles; Marty D Spranger; Donal S O'Leary; Hamilton Roschel; Tiago Peçanha
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Blood flow restriction increases myoelectric activity and metabolic accumulation during whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Christoph Centner; Ramona Ritzmann; Stephan Schur; Albert Gollhofer; Daniel König
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  The Evidence for Common Nonsurgical Modalities in Sports Medicine, Part 2: Cupping and Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  David P Trofa; Kyle K Obana; Carl L Herndon; Manish S Noticewala; Robert L Parisien; Charles A Popkin; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-03

Review 7.  The Evidence for Common Nonsurgical Modalities in Sports Medicine, Part 2: Cupping and Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  David P Trofa; Kyle K Obana; Carl L Herndon; Manish S Noticewala; Robert L Parisien; Charles A Popkin; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-03

8.  The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iván Cuyul-Vásquez; Alejandro Leiva-Sepúlveda; Oscar Catalán-Medalla; Felipe Araya-Quintanilla; Hector Gutiérrez-Espinoza
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Body position influences arterial occlusion pressure: implications for the standardization of pressure during blood flow restricted exercise.

Authors:  Peter Sieljacks; Louise Knudsen; Mathias Wernbom; Kristian Vissing
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Blood flow restricted training leads to myocellular macrophage infiltration and upregulation of heat shock proteins, but no apparent muscle damage.

Authors:  Jakob L Nielsen; Per Aagaard; Tatyana A Prokhorova; Tobias Nygaard; Rune D Bech; Charlotte Suetta; Ulrik Frandsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.