Literature DB >> 28259836

Biomaterial surface proteomic signature determines interaction with epithelial cells.

Mohamed-Nur Abdallah1, Simon D Tran2, Ghada Abughanam3, Marco Laurenti1, David Zuanazzi4, Mohamed A Mezour1, Yizhi Xiao4, Marta Cerruti5, Walter L Siqueira4, Faleh Tamimi6.   

Abstract

Cells interact with biomaterials indirectly through extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins adsorbed onto their surface. Accordingly, it could be hypothesized that the surface proteomic signature of a biomaterial might determine its interaction with cells. Here, we present a surface proteomic approach to test this hypothesis in the specific case of biomaterial-epithelial cell interactions. In particular, we determined the surface proteomic signature of different biomaterials exposed to the ECM of epithelial cells (basal lamina). We revealed that the biomaterial surface chemistry determines the surface proteomic profile, and subsequently the interaction with epithelial cells. In addition, we found that biomaterials with surface chemistries closer to that of percutaneous tissues, such as aminated PMMA and aminated PDLLA, promoted higher selective adsorption of key basal lamina proteins (laminins, nidogen-1) and subsequently improved their interactions with epithelial cells. These findings suggest that mimicking the surface chemistry of natural percutaneous tissues can improve biomaterial-epithelial integration, and thus provide a rationale for the design of improved biomaterial surfaces for skin regeneration and percutaneous medical devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Failure of most biomaterials originates from the inability to predict and control the influence of their surface properties on biological phenomena, particularly protein adsorption, and cellular behaviour, which subsequently results in unfavourable host response. Here, we introduce a surface-proteomic screening approach using a label-free mass spectrometry technique to decipher the adsorption profile of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins on different biomaterials, and correlate it with cellular behaviour. We demonstrated that the way a biomaterial selectively interacts with specific ECM proteins of a given tissue seems to determine the interactions between the cells of that tissue and biomaterials. Accordingly, this approach can potentially revolutionize the screening methods for investigating the protein-cell-biomaterial interactions and pave the way for deeper understanding of these interactions.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell interactions; Percutaneous devices; Proteins adsorption; Proteomics; Surface characterization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259836     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  11 in total

1.  Tapping basement membrane motifs: Oral junctional epithelium for surface-mediated soft tissue attachment to prevent failure of percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Nicholas G Fischer; Alexandra C Kobe; Jinhong Dai; Jiahe He; Hongning Wang; John A Pizarek; David A De Jong; Zhou Ye; Shengbin Huang; Conrado Aparicio
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Harnessing biomolecules for bioinspired dental biomaterials.

Authors:  Nicholas G Fischer; Eliseu A Münchow; Candan Tamerler; Marco C Bottino; Conrado Aparicio
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 3.  A Review on the Biocompatibility of PMMA-Based Dental Materials for Interim Prosthetic Restorations with a Glimpse into their Modern Manufacturing Techniques.

Authors:  Silviu Mirel Pituru; Maria Greabu; Alexandra Totan; Marina Imre; Mihaela Pantea; Tudor Spinu; Ana Maria Cristina Tancu; Nicoleta Olivia Popoviciu; Iulia-Ioana Stanescu; Ecaterina Ionescu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Surface bioactivation of PEEK by neutral atom beam technology.

Authors:  Joseph Khoury; Irina Selezneva; Sergei Pestov; Vadim Tarassov; Artem Ermakov; Andrey Mikheev; Mikhail Lazov; Sean R Kirkpatrick; Dmitry Shashkov; Alexandre Smolkov
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2019-02-21

5.  Molecular mechanisms of osteogenesis and antibacterial activity of Cu-bearing Ti alloy in a bone defect model with infection in vivo.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Hanjun Qin; Yu Chai; Ping Zhang; Yirong Chen; Ke Yang; Min Qin; Yifang Zhang; Hong Xia; Ling Ren; Bin Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effect of Microgroove Structure in PDMS-Based Silicone Implants on Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Xin Zhou; Shuqing Huang; Yujie Lan; Rongshuai Yan; Xiaohua Shi; Xiang Li; Yiming Zhang; Zeyuan Lei; Dongli Fan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 7.  Junctional epithelium and hemidesmosomes: Tape and rivets for solving the "percutaneous device dilemma" in dental and other permanent implants.

Authors:  Nicholas G Fischer; Conrado Aparicio
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-03-19

Review 8.  Extracellular Matrix as a Regulator of Epidermal Stem Cell Fate.

Authors:  Elina Chermnykh; Ekaterina Kalabusheva; Ekaterina Vorotelyak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Role of glucosyltransferase R in biofilm interactions between Streptococcus oralis and Candida albicans.

Authors:  João Gabriel Silva Souza; Martinna Bertolini; Angela Thompson; Jillian M Mansfield; André Alex Grassmann; Kendra Maas; Melissa J Caimano; Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barao; M Margaret Vickerman; Anna Dongari-Bagtzoglou
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific.

Authors:  Nicolas Söhling; Muriel Ondreka; Kerstin Kontradowitz; Tobias Reichel; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.